scholarly journals Use of point-of-care ultrasound in long bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas B. Chartier ◽  
Laura Bosco ◽  
Lauren Lapointe-Shaw ◽  
Jordan Chenkin

AbstractObjectivesLong bone fractures (LBFs) are among the most frequent traumatic injuries seen in emergency departments. Reduction and immobilization is the most common form of treatment for displaced fractures. Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is a promising technique for diagnosing LBFs and assessing the success of reduction attempts. This article offers a comprehensive review of the use of PoCUS for the diagnosis and reduction of LBFs.Data sourceMEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through July 19, 2015.Study selectionWe included prospective studies that assessed test characteristics of PoCUS in 1) the diagnosis or 2) the reduction of LBFs. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.Data extractionThirty studies met inclusion criteria (n=3,506; overall fracture rate 48.0%). Test characteristics of PoCUS for the diagnosis of LBFs were as follows: sensitivity 64.7%–100%, specificity 79.2%–100%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) 3.11–infinity, and negative LR zero–0.45. Sensitivity and specificity for the adequate reduction of LBFs with PoCUS were 94%–100% and 56%–100%, respectively. PoCUS diagnosis of pediatric forearm fractures in 10 studies showed a pooled sensitivity of 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.2%–96.4%) and specificity of 92.9% (95% CI, 86.6%–96.4%), and PoCUS diagnosis of adult ankle fractures in four studies showed a pooled sensitivity of 89.5% (95% CI, 77.0%–95.6%) and specificity of 94.2% (95% CI, 86.1%–97.7%).ConclusionPoCUS demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy in all LBFs studied, especially in pooled results of diagnosis of pediatric forearm and adult ankle fractures. PoCUS is an appropriate adjunct to plain radiographs for LBFs.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1352-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna L. Waterbrook ◽  
Srikar Adhikari ◽  
Uwe Stolz ◽  
Carrie Adrion

10.19082/5092 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 5092-5097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Frouzan ◽  
Kambiz Masoumi ◽  
Ali Delirroyfard ◽  
Behnaz Mazdaie ◽  
Elnaz Bagherzadegan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangfeng Wu ◽  
Lijing Ge ◽  
Xiaoyun Wang ◽  
Yun Jin

Aims: To evaluate the effect of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the diagnosis of an abscess and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS and physical examination (PE) in paediatric patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in the emergency department.Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out to identify Englishlanguage studies on POCUS for differentiating an abscess from cellulitis in paediatric patients with SSTI. The quality of the study was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool, and pooled sensitivity and specificity of various POCUS findings were determined.Results: Seven studies with a total of 870 patients were included. There was significant heterogeneity across the included studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for the diagnosis of abscess by POCUS were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.95), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.86), 4.5 (95% CI, 3.1-6.4), 0.13 (95% CI, 0.07-0.23), and 36 (95% CI, 17-75), respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91). Four studies provided data regarding the PE method. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of PE for the abscess were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62-0.76), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88).Conclusions: POCUS is useful in identifying abscesses in paediatric patients with SSTI in emergency department, especially when PE is equivocal and outperforms PE alone.


2009 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leszek Brongel ◽  
Wiesław Jarzynowski ◽  
Piotr Budzyński ◽  
Waldemar Hładki ◽  
Jacek Lorkowski ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-14
Author(s):  
Toby Gemmill ◽  
Dylan Clements

2019 ◽  
pp. jramc-2018-001132
Author(s):  
Pierre Perrier ◽  
J Leyral ◽  
O Thabouillot ◽  
D Papeix ◽  
G Comat ◽  
...  

IntroductionTo evaluate the usefulness of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by young military medicine residents after short training in the diagnosis of medical emergencies.MethodsA prospective study was performed in the emergency department of a French army teaching hospital. Two young military medicine residents received ultrasound training focused on gall bladder, kidneys and lower limb veins. After clinical examination, they assigned a ‘clinicaldiagnostic probability’ (CP) on a visual analogue scale from 0 (definitely not diagnosis) to 10 (definitive diagnosis). The same student performed ultrasound examination and assigned an ‘ultrasounddiagnostic probability’ (UP) in the same way. The absolute difference between CP and UP was calculated. This result corresponded to the Ultrasound Diagnostic Index (UDI), which was positive if UP was closer to the final diagnosis than CP (POCUS improved the diagnostic accuracy), and negative conversely (POCUS decreased the diagnostic accuracy).ResultsForty-eight patients were included and 48 ultrasound examinations were performed. The present pathologies were found in 14 patients (29%). The mean UDI value was +3 (0–5). UDI was positive in 35 exams (73%), zero in 12 exams (25%) and negative in only one exam (2%).ConclusionPOCUS performed after clinical examination increases the diagnostic accuracy of young military medicine residents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document