scholarly journals Executive summary of the CAEP 2014 Academic Symposium: How to make research succeed in your department

CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian G. Stiell ◽  
Jennifer D. Artz ◽  
Jeffrey Perry ◽  
Christian Vaillancourt ◽  
Lisa Calder
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Leadership Education ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Executive Summary ◽  
Medicine Research ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Funding Opportunities

AbstractThe vision of the recently created Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Section is to promote high-quality emergency patient care by conducting world-leading education and research in emergency medicine. The Academic Section plans to achieve this goal by enhancing academic emergency medicine primarily at Canadian medical schools and teaching hospitals. It seeks to foster and develop education, research, and academic leadership amongst Canadian emergency physicians, residents, and students. In this light, the Academic Section began in 2013 to hold the annual Academic Symposia to highlight best practices and recommendations for the three core domains of governance and leadership, education scholarship, and research. Each year, members of three panels are asked to review the literature, survey and interview experts, achieve consensus, and present their recommendations at the Symposium (2013, Education Scholarship; 2014, Research; and 2015, Governance and Funding).Research is essential to medical advancement. As a relatively young specialty, emergency medicine is rapidly evolving to adapt to new diagnostic tools, the challenges of crowding in emergency departments, and the growing needs of emergency patients. There is significant variability in the infrastructure, support, and productivity of emergency medicine research programs across Canada. All Canadians benefit from an investigation of the means to improve research infrastructure, training programs, and funding opportunities. Such an analysis is essential to identify areas for improvement, which will support the expansion of emergency medicine research. To this end, physician-scientist leaders were gathered from across Canada to develop pragmatic recommendations on the improvement of emergency medicine research through a comprehensive analysis of current best practices, systematic literature reviews, stakeholder surveys, and expert interviews.

scholarly journals Recommendations for patient engagement in patient-oriented emergency medicine research

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Archambault ◽  
Colleen McGavin ◽  
Katie N. Dainty ◽  
Shelley L. McLeod ◽  
Christian Vaillancourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Translation Strategies ◽  
Medicine Research ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Knowledge Translation Strategies ◽  
National Patient

AbstractObjectiveTo make pragmatic recommendations on best practices for the engagement of patients in emergency medicine (EM) research.MethodsWe created a panel of expert Canadian EM researchers, physicians, and a patient partner to develop our recommendations. We used mixed methods consisting of 1) a literature review; 2) a survey of Canadian EM researchers; 3) qualitative interviews with key informants; and 4) feedback during the 2017 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium.ResultsWe synthesized our literature review into categories including identification and engagement, patients’ roles, perceived benefits, harms, and barriers to patient engagement; 40/75 (53% response rate) invited researchers completed our survey. Among respondents, 58% had engaged patients in research, and 83% intended to engage patients in future research. However, 95% stated that they need further guidance to engage patients. Our qualitative interviews revealed barriers to patient engagement, including the need for training and patient partner recruitment.Our panel recommends 1) an overarching positive recommendation to support patient engagement in EM research; 2) seven policy-level recommendations for CAEP to support the creation of a national patient council, to develop, adopt and adapt training material, guidelines, and tools for patient engagement, and to support increased patient engagement in EM research; and 3) nine pragmatic recommendations about engaging patients in the preparatory, execution, and translational phases of EM research.ConclusionPatient engagement can improve EM research by helping researchers select meaningful outcomes, increase social acceptability of studies, and design knowledge translation strategies that target patients’ needs.

scholarly journals Building and strengthening relationships between academic departments/divisions of emergency medicine and rural and regional emergency departments

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Johnston ◽  
Kylie Booth ◽  
Jim Christenson ◽  
David Fu ◽  
Shirley Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Academic Departments ◽  
List Type ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Common Value ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Rural Physicians ◽  
Training Opportunities

ABSTRACTObjectivesMake recommendations on approaches to building and strengthening relationships between academic departments or divisions of Emergency Medicine and rural and regional emergency departments.MethodsA panel of leaders from both rural and urban/academic practice environments met over 8 months. Draft recommendations were developed from panel expertise as well as survey data and presented at the 2018 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium. Symposium feedback was incorporated into final recommendations.ResultsSeven recommendations emerged and are summarized below: 1)CAEP should ensure engagement with other rural stakeholder organizations such as the College of Family Physicians of Canada and the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada.2)Engagement efforts require adequate financial and manpower resources.3)Training opportunities should be promoted.4)The current operational interface between the academic department of Emergency Medicine and the emergency departments in the catchment area must be examined and gaps addressed as part of building and strengthening relationships.5)Initial engagement efforts should be around projects with common value.6)Academic Departments should partner with and support rural scholars.7)Academic departments seeking to build or strengthen relationships should consider successful examples from elsewhere in the country as well as considering local culture and challenges.ConclusionThese recommendations serve as guidance for building and strengthening mutually beneficial relationships between academic departments or divisions of Emergency Medicine and rural and regional emergency departments.

scholarly journals Important returns on investment: an evaluation of a national research grants competition in emergency medicine

CJEM ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Bawden ◽  
Namdar Manouchehri ◽  
Cristina Villa-Roel ◽  
Eric Grafstein ◽  
Brian H. Rowe
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Research Grants ◽  
Annual Basis ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Additional Funding ◽  
Study Completion ◽  
Returns On Investment ◽  
Median Amount

ABSTRACTObjective:We sought to examine scholarly outcomes of the projects receiving research grants from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) during the first 10 years of national funding (i.e., between 1996 and 2005).Methods:We sent email surveys to 62 emergency medicine (EM) researchers who received funding from CAEP. We focused our data collection on grant deliverables and opinions using a 1–7 Likert scale with regard to the value of the award.Results:Fifty-eight recipients responded to our survey. Grants were most commonly awarded to residents (21 [36%]), followed by senior (16 [28%]) and junior (13 [22%]) emergency staff. Twenty-six applicants from Ontario and 11 from Quebec received the majority of the grants. Overall, 51 projects were completed at the time of contact and, from these, 39 manuscripts were published or in press. Abstract presentations were more common, with a median of 2 abstracts presented per completed project. Abstract presentations for the completed projects were documented locally (23), nationally (39) and internationally (37). Overall, 19 projects received additional funding. The median amount funded was Can$4700 with an interquartile range of $3250–$5000. Respondents felt CAEP funding was critical to completing their projects and felt strongly that dedicated EM research funding should be continued to stimulate productivity.Conclusion:Overall, the CAEP Research Grants Competition has produced impressive results. Despite the small sums available, the grants have been important for ensuring study completion and for securing additional funding. CAEP and similar EM organizations need to develop a more robust funding approach so that larger grant awards and more researchers can be supported on an annual basis.

scholarly journals The core emergency ultrasound curriculum project: A report from the Curriculum Working Group of the CAEP Emergency Ultrasound Committee

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Olszynski ◽  
Dan Kim ◽  
Jordan Chenkin ◽  
Louise Rang
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Emergency Ultrasound ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
The Core ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Curriculum Project

Emergency ultrasound (EUS) is now widely considered to be a “skill integral to the practice of emergency medicine.”1The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) initially issued a position statement in 1999 supporting the availability of focused ultrasound 24 hours per day in the emergency department (ED).2

scholarly journals “The Future of Emergency Medicine” Inaugural address to the First Canadian EM Residents Workshop

CJEM ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (04) ◽  
pp. 262-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isser Dubinsky
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Inaugural Address ◽  
Health Network ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
The Future ◽  
National Forum ◽  
The University

On June 10 to 11 this year, the Residents’ Section of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP-RS) held its first official national forum for future emergency physicians — the First Canadian EM Residents Workshop, in conjunction with CAEP 2000. To celebrate the event, the RS decided to invite a nationally recognized emergency medicine leader, advocate, and teacher to be the first to address the Annual Residents’ Dinner. We were grateful for the privilege of having Dr. Isser Dubinsky be that person. Dr. Dubinsky, currently Chief of Emergency Services at the University Health Network in Toronto, was asked to speak about “The Future of Emergency Medicine.” Dr. Dubinsky's speech, filled with warmth, wisdom, and humanity, is transcribed below. — Jason Frank, MD, Chair CAEP-RS

scholarly journals P049: Post-intubation sedation in the emergency department: a survey of national practice patterns

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S80
Author(s):  
S. Freeman ◽  
M. Columbus ◽  
T. Nguyen ◽  
S. Mal ◽  
J. Yan
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Post Intubation

Introduction: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a lifesaving procedure commonly performed by emergency department (ED) physicians that may lead to patient discomfort or adverse events (e.g., unintended extubation) if sedation is inadequate. No ED-based sedation guidelines currently exist, so individual practice varies widely. This study's objective was to describe the self-reported post-ETI sedation practice of Canadian adult ED physicians. Methods: An anonymous, cross-sectional, web-based survey featuring 7 common ED scenarios requiring ETI was distributed to adult ED physician members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP). Scenarios included post-cardiac arrest, hypercapnic and hypoxic respiratory failure, status epilepticus, polytrauma, traumatic brain injury, and toxicology. Participants indicated first and second choice of sedative medication following ETI, as well as bolus vs. infusion administration in each scenario. Data was presented by descriptive statistics. Results: 207 (response rate 16.8%) ED physicians responded to the survey. Emergency medicine training of respondents included CCFP-EM (47.0%), FRCPC (35.8%), and CCFP (13.9%). 51.0% of respondents work primarily in academic/teaching hospitals and 40.4% work in community teaching hospitals. On average, responding physicians report providing care for 4.9 ± 6.8 (mean ± SD) intubated adult patients per month for varying durations (39.2% for 1–2 hours, 27.8% for 2–4 hours, and 22.7% for ≤1 hour). Combining all clinical scenarios, propofol was the most frequently used medication for post-ETI sedation (38.0% of all responses) and was the most frequently used agent except for the post-cardiac arrest, polytrauma, and hypercapnic respiratory failure scenarios. Ketamine was used second most frequently (28.2%), with midazolam being third most common (14.5%). Post-ETI sedation was provided by > 98% of physicians in all situations except the post-cardiac arrest (26.1% indicating no sedation) and toxicology (15.5% indicating no sedation) scenarios. Sedation was provided by infusion in 74.6% of cases and bolus in 25.4%. Conclusion: Significant practice variability with respect to post-ETI sedation exists amongst Canadian emergency physicians. Future quality improvement studies should examine sedation provided in real clinical scenarios with a goal of establishing best sedation practices to improve patient safety and quality of care.

scholarly journals CAEP 2015 Academic Symposium: Recommendations for University Governance and Administration for Emergency Medicine

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S18-S25 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Petrie ◽  
Anil Chopra ◽  
Alecs Chochinov ◽  
Jennifer D. Artz ◽  
Michael Schull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Local Environment ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Academic Units ◽  
Research And Education ◽  
Exceptional Patient

AbstractObjective1) To identify the strengths and challenges of governance structures in academic emergency medicine (EM), and 2) to make recommendations on principles and approaches that may guide improvements.MethodsOver the course of 9 months, eight established EM leaders met by teleconference, reviewed the literature, and discussed their findings and experiences to arrive at recommendations on governance in academic units of EM. The results and recommendations were presented at the annual Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium, where attendees provided feedback. The updated recommendations were subsequently distributed to the CAEP Academic Section for further input, and the final recommendations were decided by consensus.ResultsThe panel identified four governance areas of interest: 1) the elements of governance; 2) the relationships between emergency physicians and academic units of EM, and between the academic units of EM and faculty of medicine; 3) current status of governance in Canadian academic units of EM; and 4) essential elements of good governance. Six recommendations were developed around three themes, including 1) the importance of good governance; 2) the purposes of an academic unit of EM; and 3) essential elements for better governance for academic units of EM. Recommendations included identifying the importance of good governance, recognizing the need to adapt to the different models depending on the local environment; seeking full departmental status, provided it is mutually beneficial to EM and the faculty of medicine (and health authority); using a consultation service to learn from the experience of other academic units of EM; and establishing an annual forum for EM leaders.ConclusionAlthough governance of academic EM is complex, there are ways to iteratively improve the mission of academic units of EM: providing exceptional patient care through research and education. Although there is no one-size-fits-all guide, there are practical recommended steps for academic units of EM to consider.

scholarly journals Evaluating emergency physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of FARC ex‐combatants: A pilot study of Colombia's emergency medicine teaching hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 757-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Reynolds ◽  
Leonar G. Aguiar ◽  
Katelyn Moretti ◽  
Andres Duarte ◽  
Fabián Andrés Rosas Romero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Emergency Physicians

scholarly journals Building a national organization of future emergency medicine physicians

CJEM ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 132
Author(s):  
Jason R. Frank
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
National Organization ◽  
New Family ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Family Medicine Residents

Resident interest in emergency medicine (EM) is on the rise. Each year, postgraduate matches add to the ranks of Canadian EM residents, and the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Residents’ Section (RS) continues to expand. The numbers are inspiring. This year, 16 residents accepted Royal College EM postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) slots. Many more began their CCFP(EM) PGY-3 year, and this doesn’t include the residents who matched separately to EM training programs in Quebec. At the same time, the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) matched about 433 new Family Medicine residents and 63 new Pediatrics residents. A significant number of these groups will also go on to develop interests and skills in EM.

31. The birth of a new specialty: The history of emergency medicine in Canada

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Elyas
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Clinical Medicine ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
History Of

Modern day emergency rooms across Canada have almost completely transformed over the past 30 years; perhaps more so than any other specialty. Before the 1970’s, it was primarily general practitioners working on a part-time basis who ran our emergency departments. Some hospitals used interns and residents as first-line emergency care providers, often under the direction of a surgeon or internist. Emergency Medicine has evolved into a highly sophisticated and respected medical specialty that extends beyond clinical medicine, into both research and academia. The appeal of Emergency Medicine is so great that it is now one of the most sought after specialties in the annual CaRMS match. The success story of Emergency Medicine is characterized by the tireless efforts and determination of its founders across the country. They fought for adequate and supervised care of the acutely ill or traumatized patient, believing in a special body of knowledge that should be available to physicians who spend most, if not all, their time in Emergency Departments. In 1977, these founders formally united and The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians was born. A few years later, in 1980, Emergency Medicine was finally designated as a free-standing specialty by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Meanwhile, the College of Family Physicians of Canada also sought to establish a parallel route for Emergency Training of Family Physicians, feeling that Emergency Medicine lay within the realm of Family Medicine. The result was that both colleges established Emergency Medicine training programs that exist until this day. Using journals, archives, a survey, and interviews, the paper will trace the history of the professionalization of Emergency Medicine in Canada. Johnson R. The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 1993; 11:362-364. Reudy J, Seaton T, Walker D, Rowat B, Cassie J. Report of the Task Force on Emergency Medicine: RCPSC Accreditation Section, 1988. Walker DMC. History and Development of the Royal College Specialty of Emergency Medicine. Annals Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 1987; 20:349-352.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document