scholarly journals Multi-modal sensing and analysis of poster conversations with smart posterboard

Author(s):  
Tatsuya Kawahara ◽  
Takuma Iwatate ◽  
Koji Inoue ◽  
Soichiro Hayashi ◽  
Hiromasa Yoshimoto ◽  
...  

Conversations in poster sessions in academic events, referred to as poster conversations, pose interesting, and challenging topics on multi-modal signal and information processing. We have developed a smart posterboard for multi-modal recording and analysis of poster conversations. The smart posterboard has multiple sensing devices to record poster conversations, so we can review who came to the poster and what kind of questions or comments he/she made. The conversation analysis incorporates face and eye-gaze tracking for effective speaker diarization. It is demonstrated that eye-gaze information is useful for predicting turn-taking and also improving speaker diarization. Moreover, high-level indexing of interest and comprehension level of the audience is explored based on the multi-modal behaviors during the conversation. This is realized by predicting the audience's speech acts such as questions and reactive tokens.

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1144-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Torricelli ◽  
Michela Goffredo ◽  
Silvia Conforto ◽  
Maurizio Schmid

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Inoue ◽  
Yukoh Wakabayashi ◽  
Hiromasa Yoshimoto ◽  
Tatsuya Kawahara
Keyword(s):  
Eye Gaze ◽  

1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M. Egbert

ABSTRACTJust as turn-taking has been found to be both context-free and context-sensitive (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson 1974), the organization of repair is also shown here to be both context-free and context-sensitive. In a comparison of American and German conversation, repair can be shown to be context-free in that, basically, the same mechanism can be found across these two languages. However, repair is also sensitive to the linguistic inventory of a given language; in German, morphological marking, syntactic constraints, and grammatical congruity across turns are used as interactional resources. In addition, repair is sensitive to certain characteristics of social situations. The selection of a particular repair initiator, Germanbitte?‘pardon?’, indexes that there is no mutual gaze between interlocutors; i.e., there is no common course of action. The selection ofbitte?not only initiates repair; it also spurs establishment of mutual gaze, and thus displays that there is attention to a common focus. (Conversation analysis, context, cross-linguistic analysis, repair, gaze, telephone conversation, co-present interaction, grammar and interaction)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document