Crossmodal Attention Applied

Author(s):  
Charles Spence ◽  
Salvador Soto-Faraco
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
pp. 538-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Watanabe ◽  
Shinsuke Shimojo

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 150324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Nityananda ◽  
Lars Chittka

Attentional demands can prevent humans and other animals from performing multiple tasks simultaneously. Some studies, however, show that tasks presented in different sensory modalities (e.g. visual and auditory) can be processed simultaneously. This suggests that, at least in these cases, attention might be modality-specific and divided differently between tasks when present in the same modality compared with different modalities. We investigated this possibility in bumblebees ( Bombus terrestris ) using a biologically relevant experimental set-up where they had to simultaneously choose more rewarding flowers and avoid simulated predatory attacks by robotic ‘spiders’. We found that when the tasks had to be performed using visual cues alone, bees failed to perform both tasks simultaneously. However, when highly rewarding flowers were indicated by olfactory cues and predators were indicated by visual cues, bees managed to perform both tasks successfully. Our results thus provide evidence for modality-specific attention in foraging bees and establish a novel framework for future studies of crossmodal attention in ecologically realistic settings.


2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Gray ◽  
Rayka Mohebbi ◽  
Hong Z. Tan

Author(s):  
John J. McDonald ◽  
Wolfgang A. Teder-Sälejärvi ◽  
Daniel Heraldez ◽  
Steven A. Hillyard

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (0) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Annick De Paepe ◽  
Valéry Legrain ◽  
Geert Crombez

Localizing pain not only requires a simple somatotopic representation of the body, but also knowledge about the limb position (i.e., proprioception), and a visual localization of the pain source in external space. Therefore, nociceptive events are remapped into a multimodal representation of the body and the space nearby (i.e., a peripersonal schema of the body). We investigated the influence of visual cues presented either in peripersonal, or in extrapersonal space on the localization of nociceptive stimuli in a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. 24 psychology students made TOJs concerning which of two nociceptive stimuli (one applied to each hand) had been presented first (or last). A spatially non-predictive visual cue (i.e., lighting of a LED) preceded (80 ms) the nociceptive stimuli. This cue was presented randomly either on the hand of the participant (in peripersonal space), or 70 cm in front of the hand (in extrapersonal space), and either on the left or on the right side of space. Biases in spatial attention are reflected by the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS). The results revealed that TOJs were more biased towards the visual cue in peripersonal space in comparison with the visual cue in extrapersonal space. This study provides evidence for the crossmodal integration of visual and nociceptive stimuli in a peripersonal schema of the body. Future research with this paradigm will explore crossmodal attention deficits in chronic pain populations.


1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Driver ◽  
Charles Spence
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
XIAOXI CHEN ◽  
QI CHEN ◽  
DINGGUO GAO ◽  
ZHENZHU YUE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document