Ernst Mach and Friedrich Nietzsche

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-141
Author(s):  
Pietro Gori
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Ernst Mach

scholarly journals Nietzsche e as ciências naturais: entrevista com Pietro Gori

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Gori ◽  
Wigson Rafael Silva Da Costa ◽  
Vinicius Carvallho Da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
William James ◽  
Ernst Mach

Para tratar das relações entre Nietzsche e o empreendimento científico, convidamos para essa entrevista um dos mais conceituados estudiosos do pensamento nietzschiano na atualidade. Pietro Gori, Ph.D. em Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea, trabalha como pesquisador no Instituto de Filosofia da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, onde também atua como professor adjunto das cadeiras de Filosofia da Ciência e Filosofia do Conhecimento. É ainda diretor do "Lisbon Nietzsche Group" do Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA; membro da associação "HyperNietzsche", da "Red Iberoamericana de Estudios Nietzscheanos"; do "Seminário Permanente Nietzscheano" e colaborador do "Internationale Nietzscheforschungsgruppe Stuttgart". Suas principais áreas de especialização acadêmica são Filosofia Ocidental Moderna e Contemporânea; História e Filosofia da Ciência; Epistemologia e Antropologia Filosófica. Dentro destas áreas, Pietro Gori dedicou seus trabalhos principalmente aos representantes de uma virada antifundacionalista na filosofia, onde destacam-se Ernst Mach, Friedrich Nietzsche e William James. Sobre esses temas, entre as numerosas publicações de Pietro Gori, em 2019 foi publicado o livro Nietzsche’s Pragmatism. A Study on Perspectival Thought (De Gruyter). 

Introduction: Plato’s Nightmare

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Marmysz
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Objective Reality

This introductory chapter examines the “problem” of nihilism, beginning with its philosophical origins in the ideas of Plato, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. It is argued that film is an inherently nihilistic medium involving the evocation of illusory worlds cut loose from objective reality. This nihilism of film is distinguished from nihilism in film; the nihilistic content also present in some (but not all) movies. Criticisms of media nihilism by authors such as Thomas Hibbs and Darren Ambrose are examined. It is then argued, contrary to such critics, that cinematic nihilism is not necessarily degrading or destructive. Because the nihilism of film encourages audiences to linger in the presence of nihilism in film, cinematic nihilism potentially trains audiences to learn the positive lessons of nihilism while remaining safely detached from the sorts of dangers depicted on screen.

Friedrich Nietzsche

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Lemm
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Michel Foucault ◽  
Gilles Deleuze ◽  
Georges Bataille ◽  
Giorgio Agamben ◽  
Eternal Recurrence ◽  
German Philosopher ◽  
Point Of Reference

Readers of Giorgio Agamben would agree that the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) is not one of his primary interlocutors. As such, Agamben’s engagement with Nietzsche is different from the French reception of Nietzsche’s philosophy in Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze and Georges Bataille, as well as in his contemporary Italian colleague Roberto Esposito, for whom Nietzsche’s philosophy is a key point of reference in their thinking of politics beyond sovereignty. Agamben’s stance towards the thought of Nietzsche may seem ambiguous to some readers, in particular with regard to his shifting position on Nietzsche’s much-debated vision of the eternal recurrence of the same.

The Taste to Come

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 238-262
Author(s):  
Virgil W. Brower
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Jacques Derrida ◽  
Walter Benjamin ◽  
Martin Luther ◽  
The Body ◽  
Helene Cixous ◽  
Specific Kind ◽  
To Come

This article exploits a core defect in the phenomenology of sensation and self. Although phenomenology has made great strides in redeeming the body from cognitive solipsisms that often follow short-sighted readings of Descartes and Kant, it has not grappled with the specific kind of corporeal self-reflexivity that emerges in the oral sense of taste with the thoroughness it deserves. This path is illuminated by the works of Martin Luther, Jean-Luc Marion, and Jacques Derrida as they attempt to think through the specific phenomena accessible through the lips, tongue, and mouth. Their attempts are, in turn, supplemented with detours through Walter Benjamin, Hélène Cixous, and Friedrich Nietzsche. The paper draws attention to the German distinction between Geschmack and Kosten as well as the role taste may play in relation to faith, the call to love, justice, and messianism. The messiah of love and justice will have been that one who proclaims: taste the flesh.

Una gran victoria es un gran peligro: Max Weber, Friedrich Nietzsche y el problema del epigonismo.

2017 ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Octavio Majul Conte Grand
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Max Weber

La hipótesis del artículo –cuyo basamento es a la vez teórico, terminológico y biográfico– sostiene que en la crítica al epigonismo que realiza Max Weber entre 1893 y 1895 se manifiesta una influencia directa del proyecto político-cultural del joven Nietzsche, en particular, el condensado en las Consideraciones intempestivas. El epigonismo es el efecto no deseado de lo grande. El dilema al que se enfrentan tanto Nietzsche como Weber puede ser resumido de la siguiente manera: los grandes hombres dificultan el surgimiento de grandes hombres. Con vistas a demostrar la hipótesis, se desarrollará una lectura apegada de “El Estado nacional y la política económica” develando su condición nietzscheana. La parte central del artículo se dedicará a dicho seguimiento, atento a la estructura propia de la Antrittsrede. Seguido al cuerpo del texto se dedicará unas breves páginas dedicadas a la fundamentación biográfica de la plausibilidad de la hipótesis del artículo. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document