scholarly journals Stalled replication fork rescue requires a novel DNA helicase

Methods ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Bianco
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Helicase

scholarly journals Interaction of the Warsaw breakage syndrome DNA helicase DDX11 with the replication fork-protection factor Timeless promotes sister chromatid cohesion

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e1007622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Cortone ◽  
Ge Zheng ◽  
Pasquale Pensieri ◽  
Viviana Chiappetta ◽  
Rosarita Tatè ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Protection Factor ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA Helicase Promotes Genome Integrity by Preventing Replication Fork Stalling: Viability of rrm3 Cells Requires the Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint and Fork Restart Activities

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 3198-3212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Z. Torres ◽  
Sandra L. Schnakenberg ◽  
Virginia A. Zakian
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Rrm3p is a 5′-to-3′ DNA helicase that helps replication forks traverse protein-DNA complexes. Its absence leads to increased fork stalling and breakage at over 1,000 specific sites located throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. To understand the mechanisms that respond to and repair rrm3-dependent lesions, we carried out a candidate gene deletion analysis to identify genes whose mutation conferred slow growth or lethality on rrm3 cells. Based on synthetic phenotypes, the intra-S-phase checkpoint, the SRS2 inhibitor of recombination, the SGS1/TOP3 replication fork restart pathway, and the MRE11/RAD50/XRS2 (MRX) complex were critical for viability of rrm3 cells. DNA damage checkpoint and homologous recombination genes were important for normal growth of rrm3 cells. However, the MUS81/MMS4 replication fork restart pathway did not affect growth of rrm3 cells. These data suggest a model in which the stalled and broken forks generated in rrm3 cells activate a checkpoint response that provides time for fork repair and restart. Stalled forks are converted by a Rad51p-mediated process to intermediates that are resolved by Sgs1p/Top3p. The rrm3 system provides a unique opportunity to learn the fate of forks whose progress is impaired by natural impediments rather than by exogenous DNA damage.

scholarly journals Fbh1 Limits Rad51-Dependent Recombination at Blocked Replication Forks

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 4742-4756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Lorenz ◽  
Fekret Osman ◽  
Victoria Folkyte ◽  
Sevil Sofueva ◽  
Matthew C. Whitby
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Gene Conversion ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Recombinant Formation ◽  
A Site

ABSTRACT Controlling the loading of Rad51 onto DNA is important for governing when and how homologous recombination is used. Here we use a combination of genetic assays and indirect immunofluorescence to show that the F-box DNA helicase (Fbh1) functions in direct opposition to the Rad52 orthologue Rad22 to curb Rad51 loading onto DNA in fission yeast. Surprisingly, this activity is unnecessary for limiting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination. Instead it appears to play an important role in preventing recombination when replication forks are blocked and/or broken. When overexpressed, Fbh1 specifically reduces replication fork block-induced recombination, as well as the number of Rad51 nuclear foci that are induced by replicative stress. These abilities are dependent on its DNA helicase/translocase activity, suggesting that Fbh1 exerts its control on recombination by acting as a Rad51 disruptase. In accord with this, overexpression of Fbh1 also suppresses the high levels of recombinant formation and Rad51 accumulation at a site-specific replication fork barrier in a strain lacking the Rad51 disruptase Srs2. Similarly overexpression of Srs2 suppresses replication fork block-induced gene conversion events in an fbh1Δ mutant, although an inability to suppress deletion events suggests that Fbh1 has a distinct functionality, which is not readily substituted by Srs2.

scholarly journals Maturation of telomere 3’-overhangs is linked to the replication stress response

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin E. Henninger ◽  
Pascale Jolivet ◽  
Emilie Fallet ◽  
Mohcen Benmounah ◽  
Zhou Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Damage Tolerance ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Telomeric Repeats ◽  
Telomere Replication

AbstractPassage of the replication fork through telomeric repeats necessitates additional DNA processing by DNA repair factors, to regenerate the terminal 3’-overhang structure at leading telomeres. These factors are prevented from promoting telomeric recombination or fusion by an uncharacterized mechanism. Here we show that Rad5, a DNA helicase and ubiquitin ligase involved in the DNA damage tolerance pathway, participates in this mechanism. Rad5 is enriched at telomeres during telomere replication. Accelerated senescence seen in the absence of telomerase and Rad5, can be compensated for by a pathway involving the Rad51 recombinase and counteracted by the helicase Srs2. However, this pathway is only active at short telomeres. Instead, the ubiquitous activity of Rad5 during telomere replication is necessary for the proper reconstitution of the telomeric 3’-overhang, indicating that Rad5 is required to coordinate telomere maturation during telomere replication.

scholarly journals The CMG helicase bypasses DNA protein cross-links to facilitate their repair

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin L. Sparks ◽  
Alan O. Gao ◽  
Markus Räschle ◽  
Nicolai B. Larsen ◽  
Matthias Mann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Cross Link ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Nucleoprotein Complexes ◽  
Lagging Strand

SummaryCovalent and non-covalent nucleoprotein complexes impede replication fork progression and thereby threaten genome integrity. UsingXenopus laevisegg extracts, we previously showed that when a replication fork encounters a covalent DNA-protein cross-link (DPC) on the leading strand template, the DPC is degraded to a short peptide, allowing its bypass by translesion synthesis polymerases. Strikingly, we show here that when DPC proteolysis is blocked, the replicative DNA helicase (CMG), which travels on the leading strand template, still bypasses the intact DPC. The DNA helicase RTEL1 facilitates bypass, apparently by translocating along the lagging strand template and generating single-stranded DNA downstream of the DPC. Remarkably, RTEL1 is required for efficient DPC proteolysis, suggesting that CMG bypass of a DPC normally precedes its proteolysis. RTEL1 also promotes fork progression past non-covalent protein-DNA complexes. Our data suggest a unified model for the replisome’s response to nucleoprotein barriers.

scholarly journals Absence of Replication fork associated factor CTF4 and F-box motif Encoding Gene SAF1 leads to reduction in Cell Size and Stress Tolerance Phenotype in S. cerevisiae

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meenu Sharma ◽  
Samar Singh ◽  
V. Verma ◽  
Narendra K Bairwa
Keyword(s):  
Cell Size ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genetic Interaction ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Calcofluor White ◽  
Gene Deletions ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Rich Media ◽  
Size Growth ◽  
Adenine Deaminase

AbstractChromosome transmission fidelity factor, Ctf4 in S. cerevisiae associates with replication fork and helps in the sister chromatid cohesion. At the replication fork, Ctf4 links DNA helicase with the DNA polymerase. The absence of Ctf4 invokes replication checkpoint in the cells. The Saf1 of S.cerevisiae interacts with Skp1 of SCF-E3 ligase though F box-motif and ubiquitinates the adenine deaminase Aah1 during phase transition due to nutrient stress. The genetic interaction between the CTF4 and SAF1 has not been studied. Here we report genetic interaction between CTF4 and SAF1 which impacts the growth fitness and response to stress. The single and double gene deletions of SAF1 and CTF4 were constructed in the BY4741 genetic background. The strains were tested for growth on rich media and media containing stress causing agents. The saf1Δctf4Δ cells with reduced cell size showed the fastest growth phenotype on YPD medium when compared with the saf1Δ, ctf4Δ, and WT. The saf1Δctf4Δ cells also showed the tolerance to MMS, NaCl, Glycerol, SDS, Calcofluor white, H2O2, DMSO, Benomyl, and Nocodazole when compared with the saf1Δ, ctf4Δ, and WT cells. However, saf1Δctf4Δ cells showed the sensitivity to HU when compared with WT and saf1Δ. Based on these observations we suggest that SAF1 and CTF4 interact genetically to regulate the cell size, growth and stress response.

Structure of the HLTF HIRAN domain and its functional implications in regression of a stalled replication fork

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (8) ◽  
pp. 729-735
Author(s):  
Asami Hishiki ◽  
Mamoru Sato ◽  
Hiroshi Hashimoto
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
The Past ◽  
Functional Implications ◽  
Fork Regression

HLTF (helicase-like transcription factor) is a yeast RAD5 homolog that is found in mammals. HLTF has E3 ubiquitin ligase and DNA helicase activities, and is a pivotal protein in template-switched DNA synthesis that allows DNA replication to continue even in the presence of DNA damage by utilizing a newly synthesized undamaged strand as a template. In addition, HLTF has a DNA-binding domain termed HIRAN (HIP116 and RAD5 N-terminal). HIRAN has been hypothesized to play a role in DNA binding; however, the structural basis of its role in DNA binding has remained unclear. In the past five years, several crystal structures of HIRAN have been reported. These structures revealed new insights into the molecular mechanism underlying DNA binding by HIRAN. Here, the structural information on HIRAN is summarized and the function of HIRAN in recognizing the 3′-terminus of the daughter strand at a stalled replication fork and the implications for its involvement in fork regression are discussed.

scholarly journals Yeast Genome Maintenance by the Multifunctional PIF1 DNA Helicase Family

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Muellner ◽  
Kristina H. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Yeast Genome ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Yeast Homolog

The two PIF1 family helicases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rrm3, and ScPif1, associate with thousands of sites throughout the genome where they perform overlapping and distinct roles in telomere length maintenance, replication through non-histone proteins and G4 structures, lagging strand replication, replication fork convergence, the repair of DNA double-strand break ends, and transposable element mobility. ScPif1 and its fission yeast homolog Pfh1 also localize to mitochondria where they protect mitochondrial genome integrity. In addition to yeast serving as a model system for the rapid functional evaluation of human Pif1 variants, yeast cells lacking Rrm3 have proven useful for elucidating the cellular response to replication fork pausing at endogenous sites. Here, we review the increasingly important cellular functions of the yeast PIF1 helicases in maintaining genome integrity, and highlight recent advances in our understanding of their roles in facilitating fork progression through replisome barriers, their functional interactions with DNA repair, and replication stress response pathways.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document