scholarly journals Analysis of long-range chromatin interactions using Chromosome Conformation Capture

Methods ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Naumova ◽  
Emily M. Smith ◽  
Ye Zhan ◽  
Job Dekker
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Stadhouders ◽  
Petros Kolovos ◽  
Rutger Brouwer ◽  
Jessica Zuin ◽  
Anita van den Heuvel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlies E. Oomen ◽  
Adam K. Hedger ◽  
Jonathan K. Watts ◽  
Job Dekker

Abstract Current chromosome conformation capture techniques are not able to distinguish sister chromatids. Here we describe the protocol of SisterC1: a novel Hi-C technique that leverages BrdU incorporation and UV/Hoechst-induced single strand breaks to identify interactions along and between sister chromatids. By synchronizing cells, BrdU is incorporated only on the newly replicated strand, which distinguishes the two sister chromatids2,3. This is followed by Hi-C4 of cells that can be arrested in different stages of the cell cycle, e.g. in mitosis. Before final amplification of the Hi-C library, strands containing BrdU are specifically depleted by UV/Hoechst treatment. SisterC libraries are then sequenced using 50bp paired end reads, followed by mapping using standard Hi-C processing tools. Interactions can then be assigned as inter- or intra-sister interactions based on read orientation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 781-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Smyk ◽  
Przemyslaw Szafranski ◽  
Michał Startek ◽  
Anna Gambin ◽  
Paweł Stankiewicz

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1216-1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke Louwers ◽  
Erik Splinter ◽  
Roel van Driel ◽  
Wouter de Laat ◽  
Maike Stam

BMC Genomics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Ibn-Salem ◽  
Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro

Abstract Background Knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of the genome is necessary to understand how gene expression is regulated. Recent experimental techniques such as Hi-C or ChIA-PET measure long-range chromatin interactions genome-wide but are experimentally elaborate, have limited resolution and such data is only available for a limited number of cell types and tissues. Results While ChIP-seq was not designed to detect chromatin interactions, the formaldehyde treatment in the ChIP-seq protocol cross-links proteins with each other and with DNA. Consequently, also regions that are not directly bound by the targeted TF but interact with the binding site via chromatin looping are co-immunoprecipitated and sequenced. This produces minor ChIP-seq signals at loop anchor regions close to the directly bound site. We use the position and shape of ChIP-seq signals around CTCF motif pairs to predict whether they interact or not. We implemented this approach in a prediction method, termed Computational Chromosome Conformation Capture by Correlation of ChIP-seq at CTCF motifs (7C). We applied 7C to all CTCF motif pairs within 1 Mb in the human genome and validated predicted interactions with high-resolution Hi-C and ChIA-PET. A single ChIP-seq experiment from known architectural proteins (CTCF, Rad21, Znf143) but also from other TFs (like TRIM22 or RUNX3) predicts loops accurately. Importantly, 7C predicts loops in cell types and for TF ChIP-seq datasets not used in training. Conclusion 7C predicts chromatin loops which can help to associate TF binding sites to regulated genes. Furthermore, profiling of hundreds of ChIP-seq datasets results in novel candidate factors functionally involved in chromatin looping. Our method is available as an R/Bioconductor package: http://bioconductor.org/packages/sevenC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document