scholarly journals Genome-wide analysis of replication timing in mammalian cells: Troubleshooting problems encountered when comparing different cell types

Methods ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Dileep ◽  
Ruth Didier ◽  
David M. Gilbert
2018 ◽  
Vol 176 (3) ◽  
pp. 2166-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Concia ◽  
Ashley M. Brooks ◽  
Emily Wheeler ◽  
Gregory J. Zynda ◽  
Emily E. Wear ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (15) ◽  
pp. 4411-4423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Sara J. Felts ◽  
Virginia P. Van Keulen ◽  
Adam D. Scheid ◽  
Matthew S. Block ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 4058-4100
Author(s):  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Saori Takahashi ◽  
Takahiro Shibata ◽  
Koji Nagao ◽  
Chikashi Obuse ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamuna S. Sreeja ◽  
Rince John ◽  
Dhrishya Dharmapal ◽  
Rohith Kumar Nellikka ◽  
Suparna Sengupta

ABSTRACT Fodrin and its erythroid cell-specific isoform spectrin are actin-associated fibrous proteins that play crucial roles in the maintenance of structural integrity in mammalian cells, which is necessary for proper cell function. Normal cell morphology is altered in diseases such as various cancers and certain neuronal disorders. Fodrin and spectrin are two-chain (αβ) molecules that are encoded by paralogous genes and share many features but also demonstrate certain differences. Fodrin (in humans, typically a heterodimer of the products of the SPTAN1 and SPTBN1 genes) is expressed in nearly all cell types and is especially abundant in neuronal tissues, whereas spectrin (in humans, a heterodimer of the products of the SPTA1 and SPTB1 genes) is expressed almost exclusively in erythrocytes. To fulfill a role in such a variety of different cell types, it was anticipated that fodrin would need to be a more versatile scaffold than spectrin. Indeed, as summarized here, domains unique to fodrin and its regulation by Ca2+, calmodulin, and a variety of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) endow fodrin with additional specific functions. However, how fodrin structural variations and misregulated PTMs may contribute to the etiology of various cancers and neurodegenerative diseases needs to be further investigated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (18) ◽  
pp. 2349-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richik Nilay Mukherjee ◽  
Daniel L. Levy

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) tubules and sheets conventionally correspond to smooth and rough ER, respectively. The ratio of ER tubules-to-sheets varies in different cell types and changes in response to cellular conditions, potentially impacting the functional output of the ER. To directly test whether ER morphology impacts vesicular trafficking, we increased the tubule-to-sheet ratio in three different ways, by overexpressing Rtn4a, Rtn4b, or REEP5. Only Rtn4a overexpression increased exocytosis, but not overall levels, of several cell surface and secreted proteins. Furthermore, Rtn4a depletion reduced cell surface trafficking without affecting ER morphology. Similar results were observed in three different mammalian cell lines, suggesting that Rtn4a generally enhances exocytosis independently of changes in ER morphology. Finally, we show that Rtn4a levels modulate cell adhesion, possibly by regulating trafficking of integrins to the cell surface. Taking the results together, we find that altering ER morphology does not necessarily affect protein trafficking, but that Rtn4a specifically enhances exocytosis.


Science ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 322 (5909) ◽  
pp. 1855-1857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiping He ◽  
Bert Vogelstein ◽  
Victor E. Velculescu ◽  
Nickolas Papadopoulos ◽  
Kenneth W. Kinzler

Transcription in mammalian cells can be assessed at a genome-wide level, but it has been difficult to reliably determine whether individual transcripts are derived from the plus or minus strands of chromosomes. This distinction can be critical for understanding the relationship between known transcripts (sense) and the complementary antisense transcripts that may regulate them. Here, we describe a technique that can be used to (i) identify the DNA strand of origin for any particular RNA transcript, and (ii) quantify the number of sense and antisense transcripts from expressed genes at a global level. We examined five different human cell types and in each case found evidence for antisense transcripts in 2900 to 6400 human genes. The distribution of antisense transcripts was distinct from that of sense transcripts, was nonrandom across the genome, and differed among cell types. Antisense transcripts thus appear to be a pervasive feature of human cells, which suggests that they are a fundamental component of gene regulation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 189 (6) ◽  
pp. 967-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjie Lu ◽  
Feng Li ◽  
Christopher S. Murphy ◽  
Michael W. Davidson ◽  
David M. Gilbert

DNA replication in all eukaryotes follows a defined replication timing program, the molecular mechanism of which remains elusive. Using a Xenopus laevis egg extract replication system, we previously demonstrated that replication timing is established during early G1 phase of the cell cycle (timing decision point [TDP]), which is coincident with the repositioning and anchorage of chromatin in the newly formed nucleus. In this study, we use this same system to show that G2 phase chromatin lacks determinants of replication timing but maintains the overall spatial organization of chromatin domains, and we confirm this finding by genome-wide analysis of rereplication in vivo. In contrast, chromatin from quiescent cells retains replication timing but exhibits disrupted spatial organization. These data support a model in which events at the TDP, facilitated by chromatin spatial organization, establish determinants of replication timing that persist independent of spatial organization until the process of chromatin replication during S phase erases those determinants.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanju Sinha ◽  
Karina Barbosa Guerra ◽  
Kuoyuan Cheng ◽  
Mark DM Leiserson ◽  
David M Wilson ◽  
...  

AbstractRecent studies have reported that CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing induces a p53-dependent DNA damage response in primary cells, which may select for cells with oncogenic p53 mutations11,12. It is unclear whether these CRISPR-induced changes are applicable to different cell types, and whether CRISPR gene editing may select for other oncogenic mutations. Addressing these questions, we analyzed genome-wide CRISPR and RNAi screens to systematically chart the mutation selection potential of CRISPR knockouts across the whole exome. Our analysis suggests that CRISPR gene editing can select for mutants of KRAS and VHL, at a level comparable to that reported for p53. These predictions were further validated in a genome-wide manner by analyzing independent CRISPR screens and patients’ tumor data. Finally, we performed a new set of pooled and arrayed CRISPR screens to evaluate the competition between CRISPR-edited isogenic p53 WT and mutant cell lines, which further validated our predictions. In summary, our study systematically charts and points to the potential selection of specific cancer driver mutations during CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saori Takahashi ◽  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Takahiro Shibata ◽  
Koji Nagao ◽  
Katsuzumi Okumura ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTHere, we report the establishment of a single-cell DNA replication sequencing method, scRepli-seq, which is a simple genome-wide methodology that measures copy number differences between replicated and unreplicated DNA. Using scRepli-seq, we demonstrate that replication domain organization is conserved among individual mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Differentiated mESCs exhibited distinct replication profiles, which were conserved from cell to cell. Haplotype-resolved scRepli-seq revealed similar replication timing profiles of homologous autosomes, while the inactive X chromosome was clearly replicated later than its active counterpart. However, a small degree of cell-to-cell replication timing heterogeneity was present, and we discovered that developmentally regulated domains are a source of such variability, suggesting a link between cell-to-cell heterogeneity and developmental plasticity. Together, our results form a foundation for single-cell-level understanding of DNA replication regulation and provide insights into 3D genome organization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document