Strategies to detect adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs in clinical practice

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Carreño ◽  
A. Gil-Nagel ◽  
J.C. Sánchez ◽  
E. Elices ◽  
J.M. Serratosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Antiepileptic Drugs

scholarly journals Applicability of somatic monitoring instructions in clinical practice guidelines on antipsychotic drug use

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurriaan M. J. L. Brouwer ◽  
Erien Olde Hengel ◽  
Arne J. Risselada ◽  
Eric N. van Roon ◽  
Hans Mulder
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Antipsychotic Drug ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Frail Elderly ◽  
Antipsychotic Drugs ◽  
Electronic Database ◽  
Elderly Populations

Abstract Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend the monitoring of somatic parameters in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs in order to detect adverse effects. The objective of this study was to assess, in adult and (frail) elderly populations, the consistency and applicability of the somatic monitoring instructions recommended by established CPGs prior to and during antipsychotic drug use. Methods A search for national and international CPGs was performed by querying the electronic database PubMed and Google. Somatic monitoring instructions were assessed for adult and (frail) elderly populations separately. The applicability of somatic monitoring instructions was assessed using the Systematic Information for Monitoring (SIM) score. Somatic monitoring instructions were considered applicable when a minimum SIM score of 3 was reached. Results In total, 16 CPGs were included, with a total of 231 somatic monitoring instructions (mean: 14; range: 0–47). Of the somatic monitoring instructions, 87% were considered applicable, although critical values and how to respond to aberrant values were only present in 28 and 52% of the available instructions respectively. Only 1 CPG presented an instruction specifically for (frail) elderly populations. Conclusions We emphasize the need for a guideline with somatic monitoring instructions based on the SIM definition for both adult and (frail) elderly populations using antipsychotic drugs. In addition, CPGs should state that clear agreements should be made regarding who is responsible for interventions and somatic monitoring prior to and during antipsychotic drug use.

Overview of Lamotrigine and the New Antiepileptic Drugs: The Challenge

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S48-S52 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Pellock
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Antiepileptic Drugs ◽  
Adjunctive Therapy ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Childhood Epilepsy ◽  
Major Advance ◽  
New Antiepileptic Drugs ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Titration Schedule

Lamotrigine, like all antiepileptic drugs, can be effective when used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. In general, adverse effects are reduced when monotherapy is employed. The most frequent adverse effect prompting withdrawal of lamotrigine is rash. This potentially life-threatening adverse effect occurs more frequently in children, is increased when a rapid dose titration schedule is employed, and is greater when lamotrigine is prescribed in combination with valproate. The availability of lamotrigine and other antiepileptic drugs represents a major advance for the treatment of childhood epilepsy. The challenge in using all of the new antiepileptic drugs, including lamotrigine, is to balance the expected improved efficacy with the potentially serious adverse effects. (J Child Neurol 1997;12(Suppl 1):S48-S52).

scholarly journals Antidepressant dose and the risk of deliberate self-harm

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Barbui ◽  
S.B. Patten
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Suicidal Behaviour ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Panic Attacks ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Self Harm

Although the mechanism by which antidepressants (ADs) may increase the risk of suicide-related outcomes is unknown, it has been hypothesised that some adverse effects, including akathisia, insomnia and panic attacks, as well as an early energising effect that might allow patients with depression to act on suicidal impulses, may have a key role. Considering that these adverse effects are dose-related, it might be hypothesised that the risk of suicidal behaviour is similarly related to the AD dose. This research question has recently been addressed by a propensity score-matched observational cohort study that involved 162 625 patients aged 10–64 years with a depression diagnosis who initiated therapy with citalopram, sertraline or fluoxetine. In this commentary, we discuss the main findings of this study in view of its methodological strengths and limitations, and we suggest possible implications for day-to-day clinical practice.

scholarly journals Association between Adverse Effects and Parental Beliefs about Antiepileptic Medicines

Medicina ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Violeta Ilić ◽  
Dragana Bogićević ◽  
Branislava Miljković ◽  
Sandra Vezmar-Kovačević
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Antiepileptic Drugs ◽  
Parental Education ◽  
Febrile Seizures ◽  
Parental Beliefs ◽  
Parental Concerns ◽  
Upset Stomach ◽  
Antiepileptic Medications ◽  
The University ◽  
Beliefs About Medications

Background and Aim: Adverse effects are common in children treated with antiepileptic medications and may affect parental beliefs about treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between adverse effects and parental beliefs about antiepileptic drugs used for the treatment of their children. Methods: The study was performed at the University Children’s Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia from 2013–2015. Parents of children treated with valproic acid, carbamazepine or lamotrigine, were eligible. They were asked to fill in the Beliefs about Medications Questionnaire (BMQ) and The Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP). Results: Parents of 127 children (average age 9.88 ± 4.16 years) of whom 111 had epilepsy (67 generalized, 44 focal) and 16 with febrile seizures participated in the study. Nervousness and/or agitation, weight gain, restlessness, headache, difficulty in concentrating, feeling of aggression and upset stomach were most frequent adverse effects, reported in 37% of the population. BMQ-specific necessity scores significantly correlated with parental education; parents with elementary school showed lower scores than those with higher education. The presence of difficulty in concentrating of their child was associated with higher BMQ concern scores (20.73 ± 4.25 vs. 18.99 ± 3.60, p = 0.043) as well as necessity scores (18.42 ± 3.31 vs. 16.40 ± 2.73, p = 0.017). Higher scores of BMQ-general overuse were reported in the presence of a headache (8.79 ± 2.81 vs. 7.64 ± 2.72, p = 0.027). Conclusions: The main finding of our study is that parental beliefs about antiepileptic drugs were associated with the presence of adverse effects. Understanding this relationship could allow physicians and pharmacists to structure better educational programs for parents of children treated with antiepileptic drugs. Education should be more focused towards understanding the adverse effects of antiepileptics which could alleviate parental concerns and strengthen their beliefs about the necessity of medication use in their children.

scholarly journals Amifostine is a Nephro-Protectant in Patients Receiving Treatment with Cisplatin- Myth, Mystery or Matter-of-Fact?

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
Sin Sil Ha ◽  
Kazi Rubaina ◽  
Chung-Shien Lee ◽  
Veena John ◽  
Nagashree Seetharamu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Review Literature ◽  
The Past ◽  
Oncology Practice

Despite reports of amifostine possibly protecting nephrotoxicity from cisplatin, it has not been recommended by any guidelines committees or routinely prescribed in clinical practice over the past decade. In this article, we review literature and guidelines regarding use of amifostine in oncology practice for protection against adverse effects from certain chemotherapeutic agents, in particular as a nephro-protectant in patients receiving cisplatin.

scholarly journals RBC Transfusion Triggers: Is There Anything New?

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-369
Author(s):  
Tina Tomic Mahecic ◽  
Martin Dünser ◽  
Jens Meier
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Blood Transfusions ◽  
Erythrocyte Concentrates ◽  
Optimal Time Point ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Rbc Transfusion ◽  
Time Point

For many years, in daily clinical practice, the traditional 10/30 rule (hemoglobin 10 g/dL – hematocrit 30%) has been the most commonly used trigger for blood transfusions. Over the years, this approach is believed to have contributed to a countless number of unnecessary transfusions and an unknown number of overtransfusion-related deaths. Recent studies have shown that lower hemoglobin levels can safely be accepted, even in critically ill patients. However, even these new transfusion thresholds are far beyond the theoretical limits of individual anemia tolerance. For this reason, almost all publications addressing the limits of acute anemia recommend physiological transfusion triggers to indicate the transfusion of erythrocyte concentrates as an alternative. Although this concept appears intuitive at first glance, no solid scientific evidence supports the safety and benefit of physiological transfusion triggers to indicate the optimal time point for transfusion of allogeneic blood. It is therefore imperative to continue searching for the most sensitive and specific parameters that can guide the clinician when to transfuse in order to avoid anemia-induced organ dysfunction while avoiding overtransfusion-related adverse effects. This narrative review discusses the concept of anemia tolerance and critically compares hemoglobin-based triggers with physiological transfusion for various clinical indications.

Impact of Peritoneal Dialysis Dose Guidelines on Clinical Outcomes

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Churchill
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
The United States ◽  
Dialysis Dose ◽  
Middle Molecules ◽  
The Impact

The objective was to review the rationale for the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) recommendations for adequacy of peritoneal dialysis and to evaluate the impact of these recommendations on clinical practice and patient survival. The K/DOQI recommendations were based on large observational studies; the target weekly Kt/V value of 2.0 assumed equivalence of peritoneal and renal clearances. This assumption is no longer considered correct. The impact on clinical practice was evaluated by an examination of temporal trends before and after publication of the guidelines in 1997. In the United States and The Netherlands, there had been a trend toward increased delivered total Kt/V prior to 1997, and there was no acceleration in this trend after 1997. Two randomized clinical trials have implemented these guidelines with increased peritoneal Kt/V (or creatinine clearance) used to achieve the K/DOQI target in the intervention group. This was not associated with improved survival, compared to a lower Kt/V, in either of the randomized clinical trials. Among the explanations for the failure to improve outcome are potential adverse effects of increasing the dialysis dose. These include increased intraperitoneal pressure associated with increased exchange volume, failure to increase clearance of middle molecules, and increased exposure to glucose. Strategies that increase peritoneal clearance without exposure to these potential adverse effects include more-frequent exchanges rather than increased exchange volume, and decreased exposure to glucose and glucose degradation products. Pending such studies, current K/DOQI guidelines should be updated in a timely manner.

Delirium on clozapine: A tale of friend turned foe-A case report

2020 ◽  
pp. 009121742097282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Das ◽  
Rebecca Minner ◽  
Lewis Krain ◽  
John Spollen
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Psychiatric Illness ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Life Threatening

Treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is often encountered in clinical practice. Clozapine remains the drug of choice in the management of TRS. Several studies have shown that clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic medication to date for TRS. But it is also well known that it has multiple side effects. Some side effects are transient and relatively benign, while other adverse effects are menacing, serious and life-threatening. Delirium may occur with clozapine and is a therapeutic challenge as there is always a risk of precipitating delirium on clozapine rechallenge. Limited management strategies are available as alternatives for the management of psychiatric illness stabilized on clozapine. In this case report, we describe an older adult patient who developed delirium on clozapine. The aims of this case report are to discuss the mechanism by which clozapine leads to delirium, revisit various factors which could possibly lead to delirium, and discuss the different management strategies available for management of psychiatric illness for a patient previously stabilized on clozapine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document