scholarly journals Orientation of noisy texture affects saccade direction during free viewing

2012 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dagmar A. Wismeijer ◽  
Karl R. Gegenfurtner
Keyword(s):  
Free Viewing ◽  
Saccade Direction

scholarly journals The Influence of the Saccade Direction on the Direction of the Consecutive Saccade during Free Viewing

i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/ic333 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-333
Author(s):  
Yusuke Taniuchi ◽  
Masahiro Ishii
Keyword(s):  
Free Viewing ◽  
Saccade Direction

scholarly journals Saccade direction encoding in the primate entorhinal cortex during visual exploration

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (51) ◽  
pp. 15743-15748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel J. Killian ◽  
Steve M. Potter ◽  
Elizabeth A. Buffalo
Keyword(s):  
Entorhinal Cortex ◽  
Physical Space ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Neural Circuitry ◽  
Visual Exploration ◽  
Head Direction ◽  
Free Viewing ◽  
Signaling Mechanisms ◽  
Complex Scenes ◽  
Saccade Direction

We recently demonstrated that position in visual space is represented by grid cells in the primate entorhinal cortex (EC), suggesting that visual exploration of complex scenes in primates may employ signaling mechanisms similar to those used during exploration of physical space via movement in rodents. Here, we describe a group of saccade direction (SD) cells that encode eye movement information in the monkey EC during free-viewing of complex images. Significant saccade direction encoding was found in 20% of the cells recorded in the posterior EC. SD cells were generally broadly tuned and two largely separate populations of SD cells encoded future and previous saccade direction. Some properties of these cells resemble those of head-direction cells in rodent EC, suggesting that the same neural circuitry may be capable of performing homologous spatial computations under different exploratory contexts.

scholarly journals Age differences in shape recognition through an aperture in a free-viewing situation

1972 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan S. Girgus ◽  
Julian Hochberg
Keyword(s):  
Age Differences ◽  
Shape Recognition ◽  
Free Viewing

scholarly journals Common coding of expected value and value uncertainty memories in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia output

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (20) ◽  
pp. eabe0693
Author(s):  
Ali Ghazizadeh ◽  
Okihide Hikosaka
Keyword(s):  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Basal Ganglia ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Expected Value ◽  
Common Coding ◽  
Repetition Suppression ◽  
Free Viewing ◽  
Gaze Bias ◽  
Single Unit Recordings ◽  
Value Preferences

Recent evidence implicates both basal ganglia and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) in encoding value memories. However, comparative roles of cortical and basal nodes in value memory are not well understood. Here, single-unit recordings in vlPFC and substantia nigra reticulata (SNr), within macaque monkeys, revealed a larger value signal in SNr that was nevertheless correlated with and had a comparable onset to the vlPFC value signal. The value signal was maintained for many objects (>90) many weeks after reward learning and was resistant to extinction in both regions and to repetition suppression in vlPFC. Both regions showed comparable granularity in encoding expected value and value uncertainty, which was paralleled by enhanced gaze bias during free viewing. The value signal dynamics in SNr could be predicted by combining responses of vlPFC neurons according to their value preferences consistent with a scheme in which cortical neurons reached SNr via direct and indirect pathways.

Perisaccadic Mislocalization of Visual Targets by Head-Free Gaze Shifts: Visual or Motor?

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 1848-1867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrid M. C. I. van Wetter ◽  
A. John van Opstal
Keyword(s):  
Target Location ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Open Loop ◽  
Spatial Updating ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Visual Probe ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Saccade Direction

Such perisaccadic mislocalization is maximal in the direction of the saccade and varies systematically with the target-saccade onset delay. We have recently shown that under head-fixed conditions perisaccadic errors do not follow the quantitative predictions of current visuomotor models that explain these mislocalizations in terms of spatial updating. These models all assume sluggish eye-movement feedback and therefore predict that errors should vary systematically with the amplitude and kinematics of the intervening saccade. Instead, we reported that errors depend only weakly on the saccade amplitude. An alternative explanation for the data is that around the saccade the perceived target location undergoes a uniform transient shift in the saccade direction, but that the oculomotor feedback is, on average, accurate. This “ visual shift” hypothesis predicts that errors will also remain insensitive to kinematic variability within much larger head-free gaze shifts. Here we test this prediction by presenting a brief visual probe near the onset of gaze saccades between 40 and 70° amplitude. According to models with inaccurate gaze-motor feedback, the expected perisaccadic errors for such gaze shifts should be as large as 30° and depend heavily on the kinematics of the gaze shift. In contrast, we found that the actual peak errors were similar to those reported for much smaller saccadic eye movements, i.e., on average about 10°, and that neither gaze-shift amplitude nor kinematics plays a systematic role. Our data further corroborate the visual origin of perisaccadic mislocalization under open-loop conditions and strengthen the idea that efferent feedback signals in the gaze-control system are fast and accurate.

scholarly journals Giving Subjects the Eye and Showing Them the Finger: Socio-Biological Cues and Saccade Generation in the Anti-Saccade Task

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p7085 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola J Gregory ◽  
Timothy L Hodgson
Keyword(s):  
Opposite Direction ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Short Soas ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Saccade Direction ◽  
Saccade Task ◽  
Saccadic Reaction Times ◽  
Saccadic Responses ◽  
Gaze Cues

Pointing with the eyes or the finger occurs frequently in social interaction to indicate direction of attention and one's intentions. Research with a voluntary saccade task (where saccade direction is instructed by the colour of a fixation point) suggested that gaze cues automatically activate the oculomotor system, but non-biological cues, like arrows, do not. However, other work has failed to support the claim that gaze cues are special. In the current research we introduced biological and non-biological cues into the anti-saccade task, using a range of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). The anti-saccade task recruits both top–down and bottom–up attentional mechanisms, as occurs in naturalistic saccadic behaviour. In experiment 1 gaze, but not arrows, facilitated saccadic reaction times (SRTs) in the opposite direction to the cues over all SOAs, whereas in experiment 2 directional word cues had no effect on saccades. In experiment 3 finger pointing cues caused reduced SRTs in the opposite direction to the cues at short SOAs. These findings suggest that biological cues automatically recruit the oculomotor system whereas non-biological cues do not. Furthermore, the anti-saccade task set appears to facilitate saccadic responses in the opposite direction to the cues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document