scholarly journals Indonesian experience on travel time use on-board of commuter rail services

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 2705-2716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosritzal ◽  
Bayu Martanto Adji ◽  
Dilum Dissanayake
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Jokubauskaitė ◽  
Reinhard Hössinger ◽  
Sergio Jara-Díaz ◽  
Stefanie Peer ◽  
Alyssa Schneebaum ◽  
...  

AbstractThe value of travel time savings (VTTS) representing the willingness to pay to reduce travel time, consists of two components: the value of liberating time [equal to the value of leisure (VoL)] and the value of time assigned to travel (VTAT), representing the travel conditions of a trip. Their relative values indicate which dimension to emphasize when investing in transport: speed or comfort. In this paper, we formulate and estimate a framework aimed at the improvement in the estimation of the VoL. By introducing a novel treatment of time assigned to domestic work, we consider that unpaid labor should be assigned a wage rate as a measure of the expenses avoided when assigning time to those chores. We use state-of-the-art data on time use and expenses as well as online data on gig workers collected in Austria, and apply the time-use and expenditure model of Jara-Diaz et al. (Transp Res Part B 42(10):946–957, 2008). The wage rates for paid and unpaid work were combined to re-formulate the budget constraint, which affected women more than men due to the higher involvement of the former in domestic activities. Compared against the original estimation, the VoL changed from €10/h for men and €6/h for women to €9/h for both genders, which in turn yields a larger average VTAT, which becomes positive for public transport. As a conclusion, the novel treatment of domestic labor contributes to closing the gap in the VoL between genders and highlights the power of unveiling the components behind the VTTS. The empirical findings imply that investments in travel time reductions rather than in comfort should be prioritized, given the very good conditions of public transport in Austria.


2015 ◽  
pp. 180-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Vincent-Geslin ◽  
Emmanuel Ravalet

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Cherrington ◽  
Allan Rutter ◽  
Curtis Morgan ◽  
Emmanuel S. “Bruce” Horowitz ◽  
James Stoetzel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Cherrington ◽  
Allan Rutter ◽  
Curtis Morgan ◽  
Emmanuel S. “Bruce” Horowitz ◽  
James Stoetzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Urban Studies ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 2226-2244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugo Lachapelle ◽  
Georges A Tanguay ◽  
Léa Neumark-Gaudet

Existing research has concluded that shares of telecommuting are low but stable, increase with distance from the workplace and that telecommuting may reduce commuting-related travel. Its effect on work and non-work travel are subject to rebound effects and, thus, still debated. Additionally, telecommuting does not necessarily occur entirely at home. The paper studies telecommuting’s potential as a sustainable mobility tool in Canada to reduce overall travel time and peak hour travel, and to increase non-motorised travel. Do types of telecommuting arrangements have varying relationships with these studied travel patterns? Using time use data from the 2005 Canadian General Social Survey, studied outcomes are regressed on telecommuting arrangements (all day home working, part-day home working and a combination of other locations and home and/or workplace) and other personal characteristics. Depending on telecommuting arrangements and travel outcomes, results vary. Working from home is associated with decreases in overall travel time by 14 minutes and increases in odds of non-motorised travel by 77%. Other forms of telecommuting yield different results. Telecommuters may be more likely to avoid peak hours when they do take trips. Types of telecommuting arrangements have different impacts on sustainable travel outcomes that should be considered depending on policy priorities.


1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Stewart Wells ◽  
Bruce G. Hutchinson
Keyword(s):  

Mobilities ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 560-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Lyons ◽  
Juliet Jain ◽  
Yusak Susilo ◽  
Stephen Atkins
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document