scholarly journals Oncological and Postoperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter and Comparative Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 850-856
Author(s):  
Grégoire Léonard ◽  
Benjamin Pradère ◽  
Laure Monléon ◽  
Jean-Michel Boutin ◽  
Julien Branchereau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Robot Assisted

Multicenter Experience With Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients

Urology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 1267-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Polcari ◽  
Joseph C. Allen ◽  
Rafael Nunez-Nateras ◽  
Chinedu O. Mmeje ◽  
Paul E. Andrews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Robot Assisted

scholarly journals PD22-03 RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH A PAIRED NON TRANSPLANTED GROUP

2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. e460
Author(s):  
Affonso Piovesan* ◽  
Rogério Sayâo ◽  
Matheus Siqueira ◽  
Felipe Bernardes ◽  
Willian Nahas
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients

Urology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grégoire Robert ◽  
Hicham Elkentaoui ◽  
Gilles Pasticier ◽  
Lionel Couzi ◽  
Pierre Merville ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients

scholarly journals Radical prostatectomy outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective case series of Thai patients

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Sirisopana ◽  
Pocharapong Jenjitranant ◽  
Premsant Sangkum ◽  
Kittinut Kijvikai ◽  
Suthep Pacharatakul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The incidence of prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients (RTR) is similar to the general population. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard of care in the management of clinically localized cancer, but is considered complicated due to the presence of adhesions, and the location of transplanted ureter/kidney. To date, a few case series or studies on RP in RTR have been published, especially in Asian patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety and report the experience with RP on RTR. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data of 1270 patients who underwent RP from January 2008 to March 2020, of which 5 patients were RTR. All available baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data (operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, length of hospital stay, complication), pathological stage, Gleason score, surgical margin status, and pre/postoperative creatinine were reviewed. Results Of the 5 RTR who underwent RPs (1 open radical prostatectomy (ORP), 1 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), 2 robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALRP), and 1 Retzius-sparing RALRP (RS-RALRP)) prostatectomy, the mean age (± SD) was 70 (± 5.62) years. In LRP and RALRP cases, the standard ports were moved slightly medially to prevent graft injury. The mean operative time ranged from 190 to 365 min. The longest operative time and highest EBL (630 ml) was the ORP case due to severe adhesion in Retzius space. For LRP and RALRP cases, the operative times seemed comparable and had EBL of ≤ 300 ml. All RPs were successful without any major intra-operative complication. There was no significant change in graft function. The restorations of urinary continence were within 1 month in RS-RALRP, approximately 6 months in RALRP, and about 1 year in ORP and LRP. Three patients with positive surgical margins had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence at the first follow-up and 1 had later PSA recurrence. Two patients with negative margins were free from biochemical recurrence at 47 and 3 months after their RP. Conclusions Our series suggested that all RP techniques are safe and feasible mode of treatment for localized prostate cancer in RTR.

scholarly journals SUN-072 Emotional Disorders in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: A Comparative Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. S232
Author(s):  
M. REZAGHOLIZAMENJANY ◽  
P. Yousefichaijan ◽  
R. Mohammad ◽  
A. Eghbali ◽  
H. Taherahmadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Emotional Disorders ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Pediatric Renal Transplant ◽  
Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients

A Comparative Study of 3-Week and 6-Week Duration of Double-J Stent Placement in Renal Transplant Recipients

2012 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liting Huang ◽  
Xiaoxia Wang ◽  
Yujie Ma ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
Xiaoqin Tao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Double J Stent
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document