Transplant Coordinators' Opinions Regarding the Decreasing Indicator of Organ Donation From Deceased Donors in Poland

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1962-1966
Author(s):  
J. Czerwiński ◽  
A. Pszenny ◽  
A. Woderska ◽  
R. Trześniewski ◽  
M. Trujnara ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1007-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Kumar ◽  
Ravinder Ahlawat ◽  
Anil K. Gupta ◽  
Rakesh K. Sharma ◽  
Mukut Minz ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judd B. Kessler ◽  
Alvin E. Roth

Organs for transplantation are a scarce resource. Paying to increase the supply of organs is illegal in much of the world. We review efforts to increase transplantation by increasing the supply of available organs from living and deceased donors. Progress has been made in increasing the availability of living donor kidneys through kidney exchange. Recent legislation in Israel aims at encouraging deceased donation by awarding priority for receiving organs to registered donors. We also explore the manner in which organ donation is solicited and present evidence to suggest that some recent movement towards 'mandated choice' may be counterproductive.


2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (10S) ◽  
pp. 498
Author(s):  
W. Rowinski ◽  
A. Jakubowska-Winecka ◽  
M. Kosieradzki ◽  
B. Wejda ◽  
P. Osinska ◽  
...  

Diametros ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Justyna Magdalena Czekajewska ◽  
Aleksandra Jaworowicz-Zimny

According to the International Register of Organ Donation and Transplantation, Japan is one of the countries with the lowest number of registered deceased donors. In 2019, Japan was ranked 61st out of 70 countries. The authors of this article have decided to explore the reasons for this phenomenon. In the first part of the work, religious influences (Shinto and Buddhism), the tradition of gotai manzoku, the importance of altruism and the family in the perception of death and organ transplantation by the Japanese are considered. The second part of the article presents the arguments of Alan Shewmon, who believes that brain death is not death in the biological sense. Undermining the brain’s death criterion raises doubts concerning death of patients in irreversible coma, what in result discourages transplantology in Japan. In the third part, the authors compare the results of JOTN, IRODaT and the Fact Book of Organ Transplantation 2018 in Japan from 2010 to 2018. The aim of the article is to explain the cultural determinants of transplantology in Japan, taking into account the influence of philosophical and bioethical aspects of human death.


2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1390-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Lewandowska ◽  
J. Czerwiński ◽  
M. Hermanowicz ◽  
J. Przygoda ◽  
I. Podobińska ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 273 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Kumar ◽  
R. Ahlawat ◽  
R. Sharma ◽  
A. Gupta ◽  
M. Minz ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Bowers ◽  
Marbelly Davila ◽  
Jacentha Buggs

Introduction: A fundamental gap in correlation appears to exist between bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and preservation of the gift of life for people who die each day awaiting organ transplantation. As a result, the incidence of bystander CPR as a bridge to organ donation has not been articulated. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that kidneys recovered with bystander CPR demonstrate equivalent survival rates with first responder CPR and or no CPR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our transplant database from 2008-2013. We also evaluated the nationwide, population-based database from the United Network for Organ Sharing. Results: A total of 643 deceased donors were utilized to sustain life in a sample size of 882 kidney transplant recipients at our center. There were 77 bystander CPR - mean age 49.8 (SEM 1.75), 192 first responder CPR - mean age 52.45 (SEM 1.05), and 613 no CPR - mean age 52.58 (SEM 0.63). The mean length of stay days were 9.42 (SEM 0.64) bystander CPR, 9.03 (SEM 0.51) first responder CPR, and 10.73 (SEM 0.49) no CPR. The mean one year graft survival rate was 97.4% (SEM 0.01, CI 94.85-99.94) bystander CPR, 93.8% (SEM 0.02, CI 90.46-97.03) first responder CPR and 94.1% (SEM 0.01, CI 92.33-95.86). The mean death-censored graft survival days were 2230 (SEM 67.98) bystander CPR, 2351.22 (SEM 38.02) first responder CPR, and 2292.41 (SEM 26.32) no CPR; with a Log rank p-value=0.338. The United States’ data demonstrated 133,369 deceased donors with 44,469 receiving CPR (33.34%). The mean graft survival rate at one year was 92.62% (CI 92.18-93.06) with CPR and 91.54 % (CI 91.21-91.88) no CPR. No distinctions were made regarding the type of CPR in the national database. Conclusions: Bystander CPR saves lives both with the primary return to baseline function and the secondary gain of the gift of life. Intentional effort should be devoted to tracking the results of bystander CPR and the parallel consequence of organ donation.


Author(s):  
Martyna Łaszewska-Hellriegel

The issue of organ donation from deceased donors remains unsatisfactorily resolved in Germany. The number of donors has remained very low in recent years. Consequently, the German Bundestag was holding a debate on two MP bills aimed at amending the organ transplantation law. Two main bills were presented by different groups of MPs. The more controversial of them, supported by the Minister of Health, tried to introduce the opt-out model into Germany’s organ transplantation system. The second one aimed to improve the existing opt-in model. During the final voting, the Bundestag decided against the opt-out model and in favour of the improved opt-in one. In some experts’ eyes, an opt-out model imposes an obligation on the citizens to donate an organ after brain death. Can such a duty to the society be justified by public interest or other principles? The goal of this article is to offer an answer to this question by analysing the provisions of the German constitution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document