Epidemiological and Drug-Resistance Types of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Strains Isolated From Surgical and Transplantation Ward Patients During 2010 to 2011

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1414-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Szymanek-Majchrzak ◽  
A. Mlynarczyk ◽  
K. Dobrzaniecka ◽  
K. Majchrzak ◽  
E. Mierzwinska-Nastalska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

MRSA REMAINS A GREAT PRIORITY DUE TO THE TREMENDOUS MORTALITY --- A BIRD'S EYE VIEW

2021 ◽  
pp. 114-118
Author(s):  
Raghavendra Rao M. V ◽  
Mubasheer Ali ◽  
Yogendra Kumar Verma ◽  
Dilip Mathai ◽  
Tina Priscilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Chronic Infection ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Multiple Drug Resistance ◽  
Multiple Drug ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Benzyl Penicillin ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Antimicrobial Sensitivity

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is difcult to treat with methicillin, amoxicillin, penicillin, oxacillin, and other commonly used antibiotics because of its resistance. Staphylococcus organisms rapidly develop drug resistance as many as 50% of the domiciliary and 80% of the hospital strains are now penicillin resistant. Staphylococcus aureus also show multiple drug resistance. Therefore, Staphylococcal isolates should always be tested for antimicrobial sensitivity and chronic infection should be treated by more than one drug. Before 1960,when methicillin, is the rst penicillin's-resistant penicillin's, was brought into use, about 1%of the strains of the Staphylococcus aureus were "methicillin resistant" and by 1970 in Britain their proportion has risen to about 5%.These strains are tolerant of, low therapeutic concentrations of methicillin, cloxacillin, benzyl penicillin and ampicillin.They do not destroy methicillin and cloxacillin, but most of them are penicillinase-producing as well as being "methicillin resistant" and therefore inactivate benzyl penicillin and ampicillin. Its resistance is uncertain since infections may be cured with a high dose of methicillin.

scholarly journals Multi-drug resistance traits of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other Staphylococcal species from clinical and environmental sources

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 930-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adegboyega O. Oladipo ◽  
Oluwatosin G. Oladipo ◽  
Cornelius C. Bezuidenhout
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance Genes ◽  
Multi Drug Resistance ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Hospital Effluent ◽  
Resistance Traits

Abstract Multi-drug resistance traits of Staphylococcus species especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the clinical settings are well established. Of environmental concern is hospital effluents discharging into wastewaters. This article investigated the prevalence and detection of antibiotic resistance genes in Staphylococcus species from clinical and environmental sources in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Standard culture-based and molecular protocols were used. Seventy-six (27 clinical, 14 hospital effluent and 35 environmental) Staphylococcus isolates were recovered: 56.58% were coagulase-negative and 43.42% coagulase-positive (S. aureus). For the clinical isolates, 10, 6, 4, 4 and 1 were isolated from urine, skin, wounds, blood and pus, respectively. Isolates were resistant to methicillin and amoxycillin (91.7%), cloxacillin (88.0%), ciprofloxacin (84.0%), ofloxacin (83.3%), azithromycin (78.0%), ceftazidime (76.0%), gentamycin (75.0%), cefuroxime (75.0%) and erythromycin (72.0%). Nearly, all isolates (90.8%) had multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index >0.2. Overall MAR indices for Staphylococcus species isolated from the clinical, hospital effluent and environmental wastewaters were relatively similar (0.482; 0.500; 0.435). mecA, nuc and luk-pvl genes were detected in S. aureus, while mecA was detected in S. arlettae, S. sciuri, S. cohnii, S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus. This study informs on the potential contamination of environmental waters downstream from hospitals and possible impacts that this could have on human and animal health.

Community- and Health Care-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Tehran, Iran: Comparison of drug resistance and virulence determinants

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davood Yadegarynia ◽  
Shabnam Tehrani ◽  
Maryam Nasiri
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Susceptibility ◽  
Drug Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Virulence Determinants ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Exfoliative Toxin ◽  
Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can cause serious infections not only in hospitals but also in the community. The present study was aimed to characterize drug resistance and virulence determinants of community-associated (CA) MRSA isolate compared with healthcare-associated (HA) MRSA. Materials and Methods: A total of 44 patients with HA-MRSA and 11 patients with CA-MRSA infection (median age, 72 years) were included. The clinical isolates of MRSA were subjected to molecular analysis of virulence genes and drug susceptibility testing. Results: Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) exotoxin and toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST) genes were disproportionately distributed between CA- and HA-isolates. PVL genes were more likely to be found among CA-isolates (36.4%) than HAisolates (18.2). TSST genes were identified in only 2 CA-MRSA isolates tested (18.2%) compared with 9 HA-isolate (20.5%). Exfoliative toxin-b gene was negative in all isolates, however, one HA-isolate was positive for exfoliative toxin-a. mec-A gene was present in all clinical isolates. CA-isolates were more likely to be susceptible to trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole and vancomycin compared with HA-isolates. Vancomycin-intermediate resistance was found in 2 HAisolates. All clinical isolates were also resistant to clindamycin. Conclusions: CA- and HA- MRSA isolates are epidemiologically and microbiologically distinct. Thus, the strategies to prevent and treat these infections would be different. Patients with CA- and HA-MRSA infections should be treated effectively and receive follow-up evaluation to ensure resolution of their infection. Surveillance studies should be conducted to determine the extent of CA- and HA-MRSA dissemination in Iran.

scholarly journals Induction of Different Sensitization Patterns of MRSA to Antibiotics Using Electroporation

Molecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitalij Novickij ◽  
Jurgita Švedienė ◽  
Algimantas Paškevičius ◽  
Svetlana Markovskaja ◽  
Eglė Lastauskienė ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Pulsed Electric Fields ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Physical Methods

Treatment of bacteria-associated infections is complicated and antibiotic treatment alone is often inadequate to overcome biofilm infections. Physical methods allow overcoming this problem and propose solutions that are non-dependent on drug resistance. In this work, we investigated the feasibility of pulsed electric fields for sensitization of MRSA to common antibiotics. We analyzed the efficacy of inactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 5–20 kV/cm electric field separately and in combination with gentamicin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Combined treatment allowed using up to 1000-fold smaller concentrations of antibiotics to induce the same inactivation of S. aureus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document