Arterial anastomosis disrupton in two kidney recipients of contaminated grafts from a donor with Gorham's syndrome

2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1392-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.F Saidi ◽  
C Fasola ◽  
M El-Ghoroury ◽  
H Oh
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Recipients ◽  
Arterial Anastomosis ◽  
Gorham’S Syndrome

scholarly journals Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Opportunistic Infections after Kidney Allograft Transplantation in the Era of Modern Immunosuppression: A Monocentric Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Attias ◽  
Giovanna Melica ◽  
David Boutboul ◽  
Nathalie De Castro ◽  
Vincent Audard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Kidney Allograft ◽  
Extended Criteria Donor ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Recipients ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Kidney Transplantations

Epidemiology of opportunistic infections (OI) after kidney allograft transplantation in the modern era of immunosuppression and the use of OI prevention strategies are poorly described. We retrospectively analyzed a single-center cohort on kidney allograft adult recipients transplanted between January 2008 and December 2013. The control group included all kidney recipients transplanted in the same period, but with no OI. We analyzed 538 kidney transplantations (538 patients). The proportion of OI was 15% (80 and 72 patients). OI occurred 12.8 (6.0–31.2) months after transplantation. Viruses were the leading cause (n = 54, (10%)), followed by fungal (n = 15 (3%)), parasitic (n = 6 (1%)), and bacterial (n = 5 (0.9%)) infections. Independent risk factors for OI were extended criteria donor (2.53 (1.48–4.31), p = 0.0007) and BK viremia (6.38 (3.62–11.23), p < 0.0001). High blood lymphocyte count at the time of transplantation was an independent protective factor (0.60 (0.38–0.94), p = 0.026). OI was an independent risk factor for allograft loss (2.53 (1.29–4.95), p = 0.007) but not for patient survival. Post-kidney transplantation OIs were mostly viral and occurred beyond one year after transplantation. Pre-transplantation lymphopenia and extended criteria donor are independent risk factors for OI, unlike induction therapy, hence the need to adjust immunosuppressive regimens to such transplant candidates.

scholarly journals Use of Anti-Cytokine Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1551
Author(s):  
Marta Bodro ◽  
Frederic Cofan ◽  
Jose Ríos ◽  
Sabina Herrera ◽  
Laura Linares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Recipients ◽  
Secondary Infections ◽  
Statistical Effect ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive

In the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we aimed to evaluate the impact of anti-cytokine therapies (AT) in kidney transplant recipients requiring hospitalization due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This is an observational retrospective study, which included patients from March to May 2020. An inverse probability of treatment weighting from a propensity score to receive AT was used in all statistical analyses, and we applied a bootstrap procedure in order to calculate an estimation of the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of odds ratio (OR). outcomes were measured using an ordinal scale determination (OSD). A total of 33 kidney recipients required hospitalization and 54% of them received at least one AT, mainly tocilizumab (42%), followed by anakinra (12%). There was no statistical effect in terms of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respiratory secondary infections (35% vs. 7%) or mortality (16% vs. 13%) comparing patients that received AT with those who did not. Nevertheless, patients who received AT presented better outcomes during hospitalization in terms of OSD ≥5 ((OR 0.31; 2.5th, 97.5th percentiles (0.10; 0.72)). These analyses indicate, as a plausible hypothesis, that the use of AT in kidney transplant recipients presenting with COVID-19 could be beneficial, even though multicenter randomized control trials using these therapies in transplanted patients are needed.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Recipients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Analysis of the 2000–2019 UNOS/OPTN Database

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3063
Author(s):  
Napat Leeaphorn ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Pradeep Vaitla ◽  
Panupong Hansrivijit ◽  
Caroline C. Jadlowiec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Allograft Survival ◽  
End Stage Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Recipients ◽  
End Stage

Background: Lower patient survival has been observed in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients who go on to receive a kidney transplant. This study aimed to assess the post-transplant outcomes of SCD kidney transplant recipients in the contemporary era. Methods: We used the OPTN/UNOS database to identify first-time kidney transplant recipients from 2010 through 2019. We compared patient and allograft survival between recipients with SCD (n = 105) vs. all other diagnoses (non-SCD, n = 146,325) as the reported cause of end-stage kidney disease. We examined whether post-transplant outcomes improved among SCD in the recent era (2010–2019), compared to the early era (2000–2009). Results: After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, SCD was significantly associated with lower patient survival (HR 2.87; 95% CI 1.75–4.68) and death-censored graft survival (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.30–3.01), compared to non-SCD recipients. The lower patient survival and death-censored graft survival in SCD recipients were consistently observed in comparison to outcomes of recipients with diabetes, glomerular disease, and hypertension as the cause of end-stage kidney disease. There was no significant difference in death censored graft survival (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.51–1.73, p = 0.98) and patient survival (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.50–1.74, p = 0.82) of SCD recipients in the recent versus early era. Conclusions: Patient and allograft survival in SCD kidney recipients were worse than recipients with other diagnoses. Overall SCD patient and allograft outcomes in the recent era did not improve from the early era. The findings of our study should not discourage kidney transplantation for ESKD patients with SCD due to a known survival benefit of transplantation compared with remaining on dialysis. Urgent future studies are needed to identify strategies to improve patient and allograft survival in SCD kidney recipients. In addition, it may be reasonable to assign risk adjustment for SCD patients.

scholarly journals Improved Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Kidney Recipients 1 Year After Transplantation

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjersti Lønning ◽  
Kristian Heldal ◽  
Tomm Bernklev ◽  
Cathrine Brunborg ◽  
Marit Helen Andersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Kidney Recipients ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Sialylation of antibodies in kidney recipients with de novo donor specific antibody, with or without antibody mediated rejection

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 1076-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Malard-Castagnet ◽  
Emilie Dugast ◽  
Nicolas Degauque ◽  
Annaïck Pallier ◽  
Jean Paul Soulillou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Specific Antibody ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Antibody Mediated Rejection ◽  
Kidney Recipients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document