scholarly journals Clinical Implications of Monitoring ESR1 Mutations by Circulating Tumor DNA in Estrogen Receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuelu Li ◽  
Jiawei Lu ◽  
Lanxin Zhang ◽  
Yaoting Luo ◽  
Zuowei Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive ◽  
Esr1 Mutations ◽  
Tumor Dna

scholarly journals Circulating tumor DNA as a dynamic biomarker of response to palbociclib and fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Darrigues ◽  
Jean-Yves Pierga ◽  
Alice Bernard-Tessier ◽  
Ivan Bièche ◽  
Amanda Bartolini Silveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Radiological Evaluation ◽  
Tumor Dna

Abstract Background Following the PALOMA-3 study results, the combination of palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, with fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader, has become a standard therapy in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Palbociclib has been shown to increase the progression-free survival (PFS) overall but no predictive biomarker of palbociclib efficacy has been validated so far. We thus evaluated whether early changes of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels are associated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant efficiency. Methods ER+ HER2− MBC patients were included in a prospective observational cohort before treatment initiation. Tumor response was assessed by radiological evaluation (RECIST v1.1) every 3 months. Plasma samples were collected before treatment (baseline), at day 15 (D15), at day 30 (D30), and at disease progression. We searched for somatic mutations from archived tumor tissues by targeted deep sequencing. For patients with somatic mutations identified, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was tracked using digital droplet PCR. Ratios of ctDNA levels ([D15/baseline] and [D30/baseline]) were then correlated with prospectively registered patient characteristics and outcomes. Results Twenty-five of the 61 patients enrolled had a somatic mutation testable in plasma (NPIK3CA = 21, NTP53 = 2, NAKT1 = 2). At baseline, 84% of patients had detectable ctDNA levels but ctDNA levels had no prognostic impact on PFS (p = 0.10). Among those patients, ctDNA was still detected in 82% at D15 and 68% at D30. ctDNA clearance observed at day 30 was associated with longer PFS (HR = 7.2, 95% CI = 1.5–32.6, p = 0.004). On the contrary, a [D30/baseline] ctDNA ratio > 1 was associated with a shorter PFS (HR = 5.1, 95% CI = 1.4–18.3, p = 0.02) and all 5 patients with increased ctDNA levels at D30 showed disease progression after 3 months under palbociclib-fulvestrant. Finally, at the time of radiological tumor progression, ctDNA was detected in all patients tested. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that the efficiency of palbociclib and fulvestrant can be monitored by serial analyses of ctDNA before radiological evaluation and that early ctDNA variation is a prognostic factor of PFS.

Efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant (P+F) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and ESR1 mutations (mus) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 512-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas C. Turner ◽  
Yuqiu Jiang ◽  
Ben O'Leary ◽  
Sarah Hrebien ◽  
Massimo Cristofanilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Esr1 Mutations ◽  
Tumor Dna

scholarly journals Early, On-Treatment Levels and Dynamic Changes of Genomic Instability in Circulating Tumor DNA Predict Response to Treatment and Outcome in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331
Author(s):  
Adriana Aguilar-Mahecha ◽  
Josiane Lafleur ◽  
Susie Brousse ◽  
Olga Savichtcheva ◽  
Kimberly A. Holden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
T1 And T2 ◽  
Tumor Dna

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers high sensitivity and specificity in metastatic cancer. However, many ctDNA assays rely on specific mutations in recurrent genes or require the sequencing of tumor tissue, difficult to do in a metastatic disease. The purpose of this study was to define the predictive and prognostic values of the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of ctDNA in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: Plasma from 25 patients with MBC were taken at the baseline, prior to treatment (T0), one week (T1) and two weeks (T2) after treatment initiation and subjected to low-pass WGS. DNA copy number changes were used to calculate a Genomic Instability Number (GIN). A minimum predefined GIN value of 170 indicated detectable ctDNA. GIN values were correlated with the treatment response at three and six months by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours assessed by imaging (RECIST) criteria and with overall survival (OS). Results: GIN values were detectable (>170) in 64% of patients at the baseline and were significantly prognostic (41 vs. 18 months OS for nondetectable vs. detectable GIN). Detectable GIN values at T1 and T2 were significantly associated with poor OS. Declines in GIN at T1 and T2 of > 50% compared to the baseline were associated with three-month response and, in the case of T1, with OS. On the other hand, a rise in GIN at T2 was associated with a poor response at three months. Conclusions: Very early measurements using WGS of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from the plasma of MBC patients provided a tumor biopsy-free approach to ctDNA measurement that was both predictive of the early tumor response at three months and prognostic.

Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (25) ◽  
pp. 2961-2968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Fribbens ◽  
Ben O’Leary ◽  
Lucy Kilburn ◽  
Sarah Hrebien ◽  
Isaac Garcia-Murillas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive ◽  
Esr1 Mutations ◽  
The Impact

Purpose ESR1 mutations are selected by prior aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in advanced breast cancer. We assessed the impact of ESR1 mutations on sensitivity to standard therapies in two phase III randomized trials that represent the development of the current standard therapy for estrogen receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. Materials and Methods In a prospective-retrospective analysis, we assessed ESR1 mutations in available archived baseline plasma from the SoFEA (Study of Faslodex Versus Exemestane With or Without Arimidex) trial, which compared exemestane with fulvestrant-containing regimens in patients with prior sensitivity to nonsteroidal AI and in baseline plasma from the PALOMA3 (Palbociclib Combined With Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer After Endocrine Failure) trial, which compared fulvestrant plus placebo with fulvestrant plus palbociclib in patients with progression after receiving prior endocrine therapy. ESR1 mutations were analyzed by multiplex digital polymerase chain reaction. Results In SoFEA, ESR1 mutations were found in 39.1% of patients (63 of 161), of whom 49.1% (27 of 55) were polyclonal, with rates of mutation detection unaffected by delays in processing of archival plasma. Patients with ESR1 mutations had improved progression-free survival (PFS) after taking fulvestrant (n = 45) compared with exemestane (n = 18; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.92; P = .02), whereas patients with wild-type ESR1 had similar PFS after receiving either treatment (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.67; P = .77). In PALOMA3, ESR1 mutations were found in the plasma of 25.3% of patients (91 of 360), of whom 28.6% (26 of 91) were polyclonal, with mutations associated with acquired resistance to prior AI. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib improved PFS compared with fulvestrant plus placebo in both ESR1 mutant (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.74; P = .002) and ESR1 wild-type patients (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.70; P < .001). Conclusion ESR1 mutation analysis in plasma after progression after prior AI therapy may help direct choice of further endocrine-based therapy. Additional confirmatory studies are required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document