scholarly journals Percutaneous Transthoracic Lung Biopsy: Comparison Between C-Arm Cone-Beam CT and Conventional CT Guidance

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Chung Cheng ◽  
Sheng-Heng Tsai ◽  
Yuchi Cheng ◽  
Jeon-Hor Chen ◽  
Jyh-Wen Chai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Ct Guidance ◽  
Conventional Ct

Pediatric Percutaneous Osteoid Osteoma Ablation: Cone-Beam CT with Fluoroscopic Overlay Versus Conventional CT Guidance

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1593-1599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon C. Perry ◽  
Eric J. Monroe ◽  
Tyler McKay ◽  
Kalpana M. Kanal ◽  
Giridhar Shivaram
Keyword(s):  
Osteoid Osteoma ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Ct Guidance ◽  
Conventional Ct

Pulmonary Masses: Initial Results of Cone-beam CT Guidance with Needle Planning Software for Percutaneous Lung Biopsy

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1414-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sicco J. Braak ◽  
Gerarda J. M. Herder ◽  
Johannes P. M. van Heesewijk ◽  
Marco J. L. van Strijen
Keyword(s):  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Ct Guidance ◽  
Planning Software ◽  
Percutaneous Lung Biopsy ◽  
Initial Results ◽  
Pulmonary Masses

scholarly journals C-Arm Cone-Beam CT Virtual Navigation Versus Conventional CT Guidance in the Transthoracic Lung Biopsy: A Case-Control Study

Diagnostics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Lian Yang ◽  
Yue Wang ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Dehan Liu ◽  
Xin Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Ct Guidance ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Virtual Navigation ◽  
Ct Guided ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lung Biopsies ◽  
Conventional Ct

C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) virtual navigation-guided lung biopsy has been developed in the last decade as an alternative to conventional CT-guided lung biopsy. This study aims to compare the biopsy accuracy and safety between these two techniques and explores the risk factors of biopsy-related complications. A total of 217 consecutive patients undergoing conventional CT- or C-arm CBCT virtual navigation-guided lung biopsy from 1 June 2018 to 31 December 2019 in this single-center were retrospectively reviewed. Multiple factors (e.g., prior emphysema, lesion size, etc.) were compared between two biopsy techniques. The risk factors of complications were explored by using logistic regression. The patients’ median age and male-to-female ratio were 63 years and 2.1:1, respectively. Eighty-two (82) patients (37.8%) underwent conventional CT-guided biopsies, and the other 135 patients (62.2%) C-arm CBCT virtual navigation-guided biopsies. Compared with patients undergoing C-arm CBCT virtual navigation-guided lung biopsies, patients undergoing conventional CT-guided lung biopsies showed higher needle repositioning rate, longer operation time, and higher effective dose of X-ray (52.4% vs. 6.7%, 25 min vs. 15 min, and 13.4 mSv vs. 7.6 mSv, respectively; p < 0.001, each). In total, the accurate biopsy was achieved in 215 of 217 patients (99.1%), without a significant difference between the two biopsy techniques (p = 1.000). The overall complication rates, including pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage/hemoptysis, are 26.3% (57/217), with most minor complications (56/57, 98.2%). The needle repositioning was the only independent risk factor of complications with an odds ratio of 6.169 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the C-arm CBCT virtual navigation is better in percutaneous lung biopsy than conventional CT guidance, facilitating needle positioning and reducing radiation exposure. Needle repositioning should be avoided because it brings about more biopsy-related complications.

Effective Dose during Needle Interventions: Cone-beam CT Guidance Compared with Conventional CT Guidance

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sicco J. Braak ◽  
Marco J.L. van Strijen ◽  
Hendrik W. van Es ◽  
Rutger A.J. Nievelstein ◽  
Johannes P.M. van Heesewijk
Keyword(s):  
Effective Dose ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Ct Guidance ◽  
Conventional Ct ◽  
Needle Interventions

Cone-Beam CT with Fluoroscopic Overlay Versus Conventional CT Guidance for Percutaneous Abdominopelvic Abscess Drain Placement

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler McKay ◽  
Christopher R. Ingraham ◽  
Guy E. Johnson ◽  
Matthew J. Kogut ◽  
Sandeep Vaidya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Ct Guidance ◽  
Drain Placement ◽  
Conventional Ct

scholarly journals Prospective Randomized Trial for Image-Guided Biopsy Using Cone-Beam CT Navigation Compared with Conventional CT

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1342-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh ◽  
Teresa Fisher ◽  
John Jacobus ◽  
Marlene Skopec ◽  
Alessandro Radaelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Guided Biopsy ◽  
Conventional Ct

scholarly journals Percutaneous Osteoplasty under Fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT guidance for Painful Sternal Metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun-wei Liu ◽  
Zhi-guo Wang ◽  
Jin Peng ◽  
Gang Sun
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Ct Guidance ◽  
Numerical Rating ◽  
Cement Distribution ◽  
Painful Bone Metastases

Abstract Background: Although percutaneous osteoplasty (POP) has been widely accepted and is now being performed for the treatment of painful bone metastases outside the spine, there are only scarced reports regarding osteoplasty in painful sternal metastases.Case presentation: The paper reported four patients with painful sternal metastasis who underwent POP under fluoroscopic and cone-beam CT guidance. The patients were three men and one woman (mean age, 66.25 years). Primary tumor location in lung is 3 cases, in thyroid is 1 case. In these cases, Pain was measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS), with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The scores on the NRS in the four patients before POP were 9, 8, 8, and 9. After POP, the NRS scores decreased to 2, 3, 2, and 2, respectively, in follow-up at 6 months. Conclusions: POP is a safe and effective treatment for pain caused by metastatic bone tumors in the sternum. However, care and at tention should be paid to the insertion of a needle and cement distribution for better treatment effect

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document