Fostering product innovation: Differences between new ventures and established firms

Technovation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 41-42 ◽  
pp. 25-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Antolín-López ◽  
José Céspedes-Lorente ◽  
Nieves García-de-Frutos ◽  
Javier Martínez-del-Río ◽  
Miguel Pérez-Valls
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 810-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Cohen ◽  
Christopher B. Bingham ◽  
Benjamin L. Hallen

Using a nested multiple-case study of participating ventures, directors, and mentors of eight of the original U.S. accelerators, we explore how accelerators’ program designs influence new ventures’ ability to access, interpret, and process the external information needed to survive and grow. Through our inductive process, we illuminate the bounded-rationality challenges that may plague all ventures and entrepreneurs—not just those in accelerators—and identify the particular organizational designs that accelerators use to help address these challenges, which left unabated can result in suboptimal performance or even venture failure. Our analysis revealed three key design choices made by accelerators—(1) whether to space out or concentrate consultations with mentors and customers, (2) whether to foster privacy or transparency between peer ventures participating in the same program, and (3) whether to tailor or standardize the program for each venture—and suggests a particular set of choices is associated with improved venture development. Collectively, our findings provide evidence that bounded rationality challenges new ventures differently than it does established firms. We find that entrepreneurs appear to systematically satisfice prematurely across many decisions and thus broadly benefit from increasing the amount of external information searched, often by reigniting search for problems that they already view as solved. Our study also contributes to research on organizational sponsors by revealing practices that help or hinder new venture development and to emerging research on the lean start-up methodology by suggesting that startups benefit from engaging in deep consultative learning prior to experimentation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiyuan Mai ◽  
Wenge Zhang ◽  
Lihua Wang

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to apply the social cognitive theory and social learning theory to examine the different mechanisms through which entrepreneurs’ moral awareness and ethical behavior affect the product innovation of new ventures. Design/methodology/approach The authors collected survey data from 150 founders and 389 founding team members of new ventures in China in 2015. The final sample contained 113 questionnaires from entrepreneurs and 246 questionnaires from their founding team members. Regression analyses were used to test direct effects, and Preacher and Hayes’ (2004) formal mediation test approach with bootstrapping method was used to evaluate the mediation effects. Findings The findings indicate that the ethical levels of entrepreneurs can affect the product innovation of a new venture through two paths: entrepreneurs with low levels of moral awareness tend to be more individually creative, which facilitates product innovation, and entrepreneurs with high levels of ethical behavior can make founding teams more creative, which also promotes product innovation. Practical implications The findings of this study suggest that entrepreneurs are not negatively affected by their low moral awareness as long as they exhibit high ethical behavior with founding team members. But such low moral awareness has to be genuine. The best way to promote product innovation in the long run is to create an organizational culture of ethical behavior rather than to ignore moral issues in decision-making. Originality/value This study challenges the assumption that moral awareness and ethical behavior are always consistent. It takes an initial step to resolve the contradiction in the current literature regarding the relationship between the ethical levels of entrepreneurs and product innovation in the context of founders and founding teams in new ventures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj C. Patel ◽  
John A. Pearce ◽  
Maria J. Guedes

We investigate the association between service intensity and the survival odds of new manufacturing ventures. Although previous research extensively addresses the value of servitization in established firms, this is the first empirical study that asks whether service intensity, defined as the percentage of sales from services, is beneficial or detrimental to new ventures. Drawing on resource-advantage theory, we further ask whether, under increasing service intensity, new ventures with a higher industry-adjusted ratio of tangible to total assets, labor productivity, or current ratio improve survival odds. Based on a comprehensive data on 6,683 new Portuguese manufacturing ventures founded between 2006 and 2010 and followed until 2015 (33,272 venture-year observations), the results show that higher service intensity lowers the odds of survival. For entrepreneurs, we caution against higher service intensity but demonstrate that survival odds can improve under increasing service intensity when the company can achieve a higher industry median–adjusted ratio of tangible to total assets, improved labor productivity, or a stronger current ratio position. The findings are robust after controlling for endogeneity and self-selection into services.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 840-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Wu ◽  
Linqian Zhang ◽  
Zelong Wei ◽  
Mingjun Hou

Purpose This paper aims to explore the effects of holistic cognition frame on novelty-centered business model design and efficiency-centered business model design. Moreover, the authors consider how these effects differ in new ventures vs established firms. Design/methodology/approach The authors use survey data to testify the hypotheses based on a database of 204 firms in China. Then, regression analysis is used to examine the relationship between holistic cognition frame and business model design. They also explore the contingency effects of new ventures and established firms on the relationships. Findings The authors find that the holistic cognition frame has a positive effect on efficiency-centered business model design, whereas it has an inverse U-shaped effect on novelty-centered business model design. Furthermore, they find that the effects of holistic cognition frame on efficiency-centered business model design and novelty-centered business model design are different in established firms and new ventures. Originality/value This work offers new insights into the effects of holistic cognition frame on business model design and provides useful suggestions for firms to promote business model design.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 13204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Yang Song ◽  
Jianxi Luo ◽  
Katja Hölttä-Otto ◽  
Kevin Otto

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 11307
Author(s):  
Raquel Antolin-Lopez ◽  
Javier Martínez-del-Río ◽  
Jose Cespedes-Lorente ◽  
Miguel Perez-Valls

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 1240001 ◽  
Author(s):  
GERRIT A. DE WAAL ◽  
PAUL KNOTT

Despite the attention it gives to innovation tools, the product innovation literature does not address the behavioural motivation behind practitioners' adoption of particular tools, or relate this to new venture development. This paper focuses on technology-based new ventures executing their first projects and presents insights into how their innovation tool adoption evolves over time. The paper synthesises case study findings into a hierarchy of tool adoption states encapsulating how new venture teams started with an exclusive focus on effectiveness, and over time progressively attended to problem solving, efficiency, and finally resource management. They often progressed to the next state only in response to costly mistakes and delays, whereas the experienced team in our comparison well-established firm operated within all four states from project initiation. Knowledge of this hierarchy of tool adoption states could help new venture teams to optimise the time they invest in product innovation tools.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 743-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linlin Jin ◽  
Kristen Madison ◽  
Nils D. Kraiczy ◽  
Franz W. Kellermanns ◽  
T. Russell Crook ◽  
...  

Upper echelon theory highlights the importance of top management teams in large and established firms; however, effects are not always clear outside of this context. Due to the unique nature of new ventures, the composition of entrepreneurial teams and its effects on performance is worthy of investigation. Accordingly, we meta–analyze the effect of three characteristics of entrepreneurial team composition (i.e., aggregated, heterogeneity, team size) on new venture performance. Our meta–analysis, which includes 55 empirical samples and 8,892 observations, finds significant and unique effects of entrepreneurial team characteristics on new ventures. Based on our findings, we derive avenues for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document