scholarly journals Uniform Hölder exponent of a stationary increments Gaussian process: Estimation starting from average values

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 1326-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qidi Peng
2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (02) ◽  
pp. 393-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Sly

Multifractional Brownian motion is a Gaussian process which has changing scaling properties generated by varying the local Hölder exponent. We show that multifractional Brownian motion is very sensitive to changes in the selected Hölder exponent and has extreme changes in magnitude. We suggest an alternative stochastic process, called integrated fractional white noise, which retains the important local properties but avoids the undesirable oscillations in magnitude. We also show how the Hölder exponent can be estimated locally from discrete data in this model.


1985 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 454-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simeon M. Berman

Let X(t), t≧0, be a Gaussian process with mean 0 and stationary increments. If the incremental variance function σ 2(t) is convex and σ 2(t) = o(t) for t → 0, then P(max[o,t] X(s) > u) ~ P(X(t) > u) for u → ∞ and each t > 0.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 67-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuliya Mishura ◽  
Kostiantyn Ralchenko ◽  
Sergiy Shklyar

The paper deals with the regression model X_t = \theta t + B_t , t\in[0, T ],where B=\{B_t, t\geq 0\} is a centered Gaussian process with stationary increments.We study the estimation of the unknown parameter $\theta$ and establish the formula for the likelihood function in terms of a solution to an integral equation.Then we find the maximum likelihood estimator and prove its strong consistency. The results obtained generalize the known results for fractional and mixed fractional Brownian motion.


1972 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 63-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simeon M. Berman

Let X(t), t≥0, be a real Gaussian process with mean 0, stationary increments, and a2(t) = E|X(t) - X(0)|2. Here dH(λ), for some bounded monotone H. We summarize the main results.


1985 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 454-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simeon M. Berman

Let X(t), t≧0, be a Gaussian process with mean 0 and stationary increments. If the incremental variance function σ2(t) is convex and σ2(t) = o(t) for t → 0, then P(max[o,t]X(s) > u) ~ P(X(t) > u) for u → ∞ and each t > 0.


2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (02) ◽  
pp. 393-408
Author(s):  
Allan Sly

Multifractional Brownian motion is a Gaussian process which has changing scaling properties generated by varying the local Hölder exponent. We show that multifractional Brownian motion is very sensitive to changes in the selected Hölder exponent and has extreme changes in magnitude. We suggest an alternative stochastic process, called integrated fractional white noise, which retains the important local properties but avoids the undesirable oscillations in magnitude. We also show how the Hölder exponent can be estimated locally from discrete data in this model.


2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Sly

Multifractional Brownian motion is a Gaussian process which has changing scaling properties generated by varying the local Hölder exponent. We show that multifractional Brownian motion is very sensitive to changes in the selected Hölder exponent and has extreme changes in magnitude. We suggest an alternative stochastic process, called integrated fractional white noise, which retains the important local properties but avoids the undesirable oscillations in magnitude. We also show how the Hölder exponent can be estimated locally from discrete data in this model.


1987 ◽  
Vol 26 (03) ◽  
pp. 117-123
Author(s):  
P. Tautu ◽  
G. Wagner

SummaryA continuous parameter, stationary Gaussian process is introduced as a first approach to the probabilistic representation of the phenotype inheritance process. With some specific assumptions about the components of the covariance function, it may describe the temporal behaviour of the “cancer-proneness phenotype” (CPF) as a quantitative continuous trait. Upcrossing a fixed level (“threshold”) u and reaching level zero are the extremes of the Gaussian process considered; it is assumed that they might be interpreted as the transformation of CPF into a “neoplastic disease phenotype” or as the non-proneness to cancer, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document