Directional effects of tectonic fractures on ground motion site amplification from earthquake and ambient noise data: A case study in South Iceland

2017 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Panzera ◽  
Benedikt Halldorsson ◽  
Kristín Vogfjörð
Author(s):  
J. Antonio Vidal-Villegas ◽  
Carlos I. Huerta-López ◽  
Erik E. Ramírez ◽  
Rogelio Arce-Villa ◽  
Felipe de J. Vega-Guzmán

Abstract We conducted experimental work to explain the large peak ground accelerations observed at the Cerro Prieto volcano in Mexicali Valley, Mexico. Using ambient noise and earthquake data, we compared horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios (HVSRs) computed for sites on the volcano against those calculated for locations outside it. High-HVSR values (∼11 at ∼2 Hz) were obtained on the top of the volcano at 183 m of altitude, decreasing for sites located at lower elevations. We calculated a median HVSR of ∼1 at 2 Hz from HVSRs computed for nine sites located along an N18°E transect and at an average elevation of ∼25 m. The earlier comparison suggests a relative amplification on the volcano. In addition, we calculated HVSRs from accelerograms generated by 62 earthquakes (2.6≤ML≤5.4; 4.6≤Mw≤7.2) recorded at four locations: two on the volcano (at 194 and 110 m of elevation) and two outside it. These last two sites, located up to 6 km away in a north-northwest and south-southwest direction relative to the volcano, are at an average altitude of 22 m. For the four locations, we also computed the HVSRs from ambient noise data. Although the HVSR results derived from both types of data are slightly different, we also found high HVSRs for the two sites on the volcano and low HVSRs for the two sites outside it, corroborating the relative amplification on the volcano. Using the 1D wave propagation modeling, based on the stiffness matrix method, we modeled the experimental HVSRs to analyze the local site effects. Therefore, we propose that the ground-motion amplification at the Cerro Prieto volcano may be due to a combination of its topography and shallow site effects.


Author(s):  
Roberto Paolucci ◽  
Mauro Aimar ◽  
Andrea Ciancimino ◽  
Marco Dotti ◽  
Sebastiano Foti ◽  
...  

AbstractIn this paper the site categorization criteria and the corresponding site amplification factors proposed in the 2021 draft of Part 1 of Eurocode 8 (2021-draft, CEN/TC250/SC8 Working Draft N1017) are first introduced and compared with the current version of Eurocode 8, as well as with site amplification factors from recent empirical ground motion prediction equations. Afterwards, these values are checked by two approaches. First, a wide dataset of strong motion records is built, where recording stations are classified according to 2021-draft, and the spectral amplifications are empirically estimated computing the site-to-site residuals from regional and global ground motion models for reference rock conditions. Second, a comprehensive parametric numerical study of one-dimensional (1D) site amplification is carried out, based on randomly generated shear-wave velocity profiles, classified according to the new criteria. A reasonably good agreement is found by both approaches. The most relevant discrepancies occur for the shallow soft soil conditions (soil category E) that, owing to the complex interaction of shear wave velocity, soil deposit thickness and frequency range of the excitation, show the largest scatter both in terms of records and of 1D numerical simulations. Furthermore, 1D numerical simulations for soft soil conditions tend to provide lower site amplification factors than 2021-draft, as well as lower than the corresponding site-to-site residuals from records, because of higher impact of non-linear (NL) site effects in the simulations. A site-specific study on NL effects at three KiK-net stations with a significantly large amount of high-intensity recorded ground motions gives support to the 2021-draft NL reduction factors, although the very limited number of recording stations allowing such analysis prevents deriving more general implications. In the presence of such controversial arguments, it is reasonable that a standard should adopt a prudent solution, with a limited reduction of the site amplification factors to account for NL soil response, while leaving the possibility to carry out site-specific estimations of such factors when sufficient information is available to model the ground strain dependency of local soil properties.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Loviknes ◽  
Danijel Schorlemmer ◽  
Fabrice Cotton ◽  
Sreeram Reddy Kotha

<p>Non-linear site effects are mainly expected for strong ground motions and sites with soft soils and more recent ground-motion models (GMM) have started to include such effects. Observations in this range are, however, sparse, and most non-linear site amplification models are therefore partly or fully based on numerical simulations. We develop a framework for testing of non-linear site amplification models using data from the comprehensive Kiban-Kyoshin network in Japan. The test is reproducible, following the vision of the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP), and takes advantage of new large datasets to evaluate <span>whether or not</span> non-linear site effects predicted by site-amplification models are supported by empirical data. The site amplification models are tested using residuals between the observations and predictions from a GMM based only on magnitude and distance. When the GMM is derived without any site term, the site-specific variability extracted from the residuals is expected to capture the site response of a site. The non-linear site amplification models are tested against a linear amplification model on individual well-record<span>ing</span> stations. Finally, the result is compared to building codes where non-linearity is included. The test shows that for most of the sites selected as having sufficient records, the non-linear site-amplification models do not score better than the linear amplification model. This suggests that including non-linear site amplification in GMMs and building codes may not yet be justified, at least not in the range of ground motions considered in the test (peak ground acceleration < 0.2 g).</p>


1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-369
Author(s):  
Takumi Toshinawa ◽  
J. John Taber ◽  
John B. Berrill

Abstract The areal distribution of seismic ground-motion intensity in the city of Christchurch, New Zealand, during the 1994 Arthurs Pass Earthquake (ML 6.6) was evaluated using an intensity questionnaire together with local site amplifications inferred from seismic recordings and microtremors. In order to estimate the intensity in parts of the city where no intensity data were available, intensity data were compared to relative levels of shaking determined from both weak-motion and microtremor recordings. Weak ground-motion amplification factors were determined using ratios of ground accelerations at five sediment sites with respect to a rock site. Microtremor amplification factors were determined from horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios at a 1-km spacing throughout the city. A positive correlation between weak-motion and microtremor amplification factors allowed extrapolation of microtremor amplification to estimated MM intensity (EMMI). EMMI ranged from 3 to 6 and was consistent with the questionnaire intensity and geological conditions and showed detailed information on the areal distribution of ground-motion intensity in the city.


Tectonics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 4226-4238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
Chuntao Liang ◽  
Qian Hua ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Yihai Yang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 2234-2246
Author(s):  
Hang Li ◽  
Jianqiao Xu ◽  
Xiaodong Chen ◽  
Heping Sun ◽  
Miaomiao Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Inversion of internal structure of the Earth using surface waves and free oscillations is a hot topic in seismological research nowadays. With the ambient noise data on seismically quiet days sourced from the gravity tidal observations of seven global distributed superconducting gravimeters (SGs) and the seismic observations for validation from three collocated STS-1 seismometers, long-period surface waves and background free oscillations are successfully extracted by the phase autocorrelation (PAC) method, respectively. Group-velocity dispersion curves at the frequency band of 2–7.5 mHz are extracted and compared with the theoretical values calculated with the preliminary reference Earth model. The comparison shows that the best observed values differ about ±2% from the corresponding theoretical results, and the extracted group velocities of the best SG are consistent with the result of the collocated STS-1 seismometer. The results indicate that reliable group-velocity dispersion curves can be measured with the ambient noise data from SGs. Furthermore, the fundamental frequency spherical free oscillations of 2–7 mHz are also clearly extracted using the same ambient noise data. The results in this study show that the SG, besides the seismometer, is proved to be another kind of instrument that can be used to observe long-period surface waves and free oscillations on seismically quiet days with a high degree of precision using the PAC method. It is worth mentioning that the PAC method is first and successfully introduced to analyze SG observations in our study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document