Pre-harvest gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) treatments play an important role on bioactive compounds and fruit quality of sweet cherry cultivars

2016 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 358-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yakup Ozkan ◽  
Mutlu Ucar ◽  
Kenan Yildiz ◽  
Burhan Ozturk
2008 ◽  
pp. 841-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. San Martino ◽  
F.A. Manavella ◽  
D.A. García ◽  
G. Salato

2010 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celia M. Cantín ◽  
Jorge Pinochet ◽  
Yolanda Gogorcena ◽  
María Ángeles Moreno

2017 ◽  
pp. 213-220
Author(s):  
Mi. Grandi ◽  
S. Lugli ◽  
L. Piccinini ◽  
R. Correale ◽  
G. Costa ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih A. Canli ◽  
Hikmet Orhan

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of gibberellic acid (GA3) applications on fruit quality of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry (Prunus avium), a low cropping and a large-fruited variety. ‘0900 Ziraat’ trees were sprayed with 0, 15, 20, and 25 ppm GA3, when the fruit were at their straw-yellow color stage. Fruit quality was evaluated at harvest in terms of size, firmness, pedicel length, and soluble solids content (SSC) to determine the optimum application. Fruit treated with GA3 were significantly larger and firmer than the controls. There were no differences in fruit firmness within the different levels of GA3 treatment; however, fruit treated with 20 and 25 ppm GA3 were significantly larger than the fruit treated with 15 ppm GA3. Trees treated with the optimum concentration of GA3 (25 ppm) in two different locations yielded fruit with 13.4% and 14.1% greater weight and 38% and 25% higher firmness. GA3 treatments did not affect pedicel length. The effect of GA3 application on SSC was complex; there was a significant interaction between GA3 and location. Being firmer than the controls, the GA3-treated fruit could be harvested at a later date than the controls.


Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Alberto Carrión-Antolí ◽  
José Manuel Lorente-Mento ◽  
Juan Miguel Valverde ◽  
Salvador Castillo ◽  
Daniel Valero ◽  
...  

The effects of preharvest melatonin treatment, applied as foliar spray at 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 mM concentration at three key points of fruit development (pit hardening, initial colour changes and 3 days before harvesting), on crop yield and fruit quality properties at harvest was evaluated in three sweet cherry cultivars, ‘Prime Giant’, ‘Lapins’ and ‘Sweet Heart’, and two years, 2019 and 2020. The results showed that melatonin treatment had no effect on crop yield, except for the ‘Lapins’ cultivar, in which increases were found. However, decayed and cracked fruit percentage was decreased in all cultivars in 2020 when adverse weather conditions occurred and commercial crop yield was increased, especially for 0.3 mM dose. Fruit quality traits at harvest, such as fruit weight, colour, firmness, total soluble solids and titratable acidity, were enhanced by melatonin treatments in all sweet cherry cultivars and in both years. Moreover, bioactive compounds, such as total phenolics and total and individual anthocyanins, were also found at higher levels in fruit from melatonin-treated trees with respect to controls. Thus, taking into account all these effects, 0.3 mM melatonin foliar spray, at three key points of fruit developmental stages, could be a useful tool to improve crop yield and quality traits of sweet cherries, especially their content on bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties and health beneficial effects.


2005 ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Sándor Thurzó ◽  
Zoltán Szabó ◽  
Imre Holb ◽  
János Nagy ◽  
Ervin Farkas ◽  
...  

The fruit quality of 15 sweet cherry cultivars (’Canada Giant’, ’Celeste’, ’Chelan’, ’Ferrovia’, ’Germersdorfi Rigle’, ’Katalin’, ’Karina’, ’Kordia’, ’Linda’, ’Regina’, ’Sam’, ’Sandra Rose’, ’Sunburst’, ’Sylvia’ and ’Techlovan’) was studied under super-intensive growing conditions at Nagykutas. We measured the fruit diameter, fruit width, fruit height, stem length and stem weight, fruit and pit weight and the total dry matter content. There were large differences among the cultivars. These differences are due to the genetic characteristics of fruits because all other conditions were the same. For 11 cultivars, we collected fruit samples several times /2-4/. We examined on this cultivars all the above listed fruit quality parameters. When examining these samples, we have gained information how earlier or later than optimal harvest time influences fruit quality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document