scholarly journals Augmentation of clozapine with electroconvulsive therapy in treatment resistant schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 171 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 215-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Lally ◽  
John Tully ◽  
Dene Robertson ◽  
Brendon Stubbs ◽  
Fiona Gaughran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Resistant

scholarly journals Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: systematic review & meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyune June Lee ◽  
Sung Min Kim ◽  
Ji Yean Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Peripartum Depression

Abstract Background Peripartum depression is a common disorder with very high potential hazards for both the patients and their babies. The typical treatment options include antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy. However, these treatments do not ensure the safety of the fetus. Recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has emerged as a promising treatment for neuropathies as well as depression. Nevertheless, many studies excluded pregnant women. This systematic review was conducted to confirm whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was a suitable treatment option for peripartum depression. Methods We performed a systematic review that followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched for studies in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases published until the end of September 2020. Eleven studies were selected for the systematic review, and five studies were selected for quantitative synthesis. Data analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3 software. The effect size was analyzed using the standardized mean difference, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined by the generic inverse variance estimation method. Results The therapeutic effect size of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for peripartum depression was 1.394 (95% CI: 0.944–1.843), and the sensitivity analysis effect size was 1.074 (95% CI: 0.689–1.459), indicating a significant effect. The side effect size of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for peripartum depression was 0.346 (95% CI: 0.214–0.506), a meaningful result. There were no severe side effects to the mothers or fetuses. Conclusions From various perspectives, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can be considered an alternative treatment to treat peripartum depression to avoid exposure of fetuses to drugs and the severe side effects of electroconvulsive therapy. Further research is required to increase confidence in the results.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Treatment Resistant Hypertension – Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. A757-A758 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. McBride ◽  
H. Krum ◽  
M. Schlaich ◽  
R. Whitbourn ◽  
T. Walton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resistant Hypertension ◽  
Renal Denervation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Resistant

scholarly journals Augmentation therapies for treatment-resistant depression: systematic review and meta-analysis – CORRIGENDUM

2018 ◽  
Vol 214 (5) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
Rebecca Strawbridge ◽  
Ben Carter ◽  
Lindsey Marwood ◽  
Borwin Bandelow ◽  
Dimosthenis Tsapekos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Resistant Depression

scholarly journals Placebo response in treatment resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple treatment modalities

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S261-S262
Author(s):  
Brett D M Jones ◽  
Cory R. Weissman ◽  
Jewel Karbi ◽  
Tya Vine ◽  
Louise S. Mulsant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Placebo Effect ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Placebo Response ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Resistant Depression

AimsThe placebo response in depression clinical trials is a major contributing factor for failure to establish the efficacy of novel and repurposed treatments. However, it is not clear as to what the placebo response in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) patients is or whether it differs across treatment modalities. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the magnitude of the placebo response in TRD patients across different treatment modalities and its possible moderators.MethodSearches were conducted on MEDLINE and PsychInfo from inception to January 24, 2020. Only studies that recruited TRD patients and randomization to a placebo (or sham) arm in a pharmacotherapy, brain stimulation, or psychotherapy study were included (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020190465). The primary outcome was the Hedges’ g for the reported depression scale using a random-effects model. Secondary outcomes included moderators assessed via meta-regression and response and remission rate. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Egger's Test and a funnel plot. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to estimate risks.Result46 studies met our inclusion criteria involving a total of 3083 participants (mean (SD) age: 45.7 (6.2); female: 52.4%). The pooled placebo effect for all modalities was large (N = 3083, g = 1.08 ,95% CI [0.95-1.20)I 2 = 0.1). The placebo effect in studies of specific treatment modalities did not significantly differ: oral medications g = 1.14 (95%CI:0.99-1.29); parenteral medications g = 1.32 (95%CI:0.59-2.04); ayahuasca g = 0.47 (95%CI:-0.28-1.17); rTMS g = 0.93 (95%CI:0.63-1.23); tDCS g = 1.32 (95%CI:0.52-2.11); invasive brain stimulation g = 1.06 (95%CI:0.64-1.47). There were no psychotherapy trials that met our eligibility criteria. Similarly, response and remission rates were comparable across modalities. Heterogeneity was large. Two variables predicted a lager placebo effect: open-label prospective design (B:0.32, 95%CI: 0.05-0.58; p:0.02) and sponsoring by a pharmaceutical or medical device company (B:0.39, 95%CI:0.13-0.65, p:0.004)). No risk of publication bias was found.ConclusionThe overall placebo effect in TRD studies was large (g = 1.08) and did not differ among treatment modalities. A better understanding of the placebo response in TRD will require: standardizing the definition of TRD, head-to-head comparisons of treatment modalities, an assessment of patient expectations and experiences, and standardized reporting of outcomes.

762. The Mortality Rate of Electroconvulsive Therapy: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. S309-S310
Author(s):  
Nina Torring ◽  
Sohag N Sanghani ◽  
Georgios Petrides ◽  
Charles H Kellner ◽  
Soren Dinesen Ostergaard
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Effect of electroconvulsive therapy on hippocampal and amygdala volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Takamiya ◽  
Jun Ku Chung ◽  
Kuo-ching Liang ◽  
Ariel Graff-Guerrero ◽  
Masaru Mimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Brain Volume ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Brain Structures ◽  
Volume Increase ◽  
Left Hippocampus ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

BackgroundElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective treatments for depression, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Animal studies have shown that electroconvulsive shock induced neuroplastic changes in the hippocampus.AimsTo summarise volumetric magnetic resonance imaging studies investigating the effects of ECT on limbic brain structures.MethodA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess volumetric changes of each side of the hippocampus and amygdala before and after ECT. Standardised mean difference (SMD) was calculated.ResultsA total of 8 studies (n = 193) were selected for our analyses. Both right and left hippocampal and amygdala volumes increased after ECT. Meta-regression analyses revealed that age, percentage of those responding and percentage of those in remission were negatively associated with volume increases in the left hippocampus.ConclusionsECT increased brain volume in the limbic structures. The clinical relevance of volume increase needs further investigation.Declaration of interestNone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document