scholarly journals Comment on: “Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)”

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 967-969
Author(s):  
Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Artery Disease

Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (49) ◽  
pp. 1952-1959
Author(s):  
Zsolt Piróth
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Artery Disease

Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established symptomatic therapy of stable coronary artery disease. Using a literature search with special emphasis on the newly-published FAME 2 trial data, the author wanted to explore why percutaneous coronary intervention fails to reduce mortality and myocardial infarction in stable coronary artery disease, as opposed to surgical revascularisation. In the FAME 2 trial, fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with second generation drug eluting stents showed a significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint of 2-year mortality, myocardial infarction and unplanned hospitalization with urgent revascularisation as compared to medical therapy alone. In addition, landmark analysis showed that after 8 days, mortality and myocardial infarction were significantly reduced. The author concludes that percutaneous coronary intervention involving fractional flow reserve guidance and modern stents offers symptomatic, as well as prognostic benefit. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(49), 1952–1959.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document