scholarly journals Left ventricular systolic dysfunction detected by speckle tracking in hypertensive patients with preserved ejection fraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Gonçalves ◽  
Nuno Cortez-Dias ◽  
Ana Nunes ◽  
Adriana Belo ◽  
Inês Zimbarra Cabrita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Speckle Tracking ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Hypertensive Patients

scholarly journals Fragmented QRS as an early predictor of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in healthy individuals: A nested case-control study in the era of speckle tracking echocardiography

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hossein Nikoo ◽  
Zahra Jamali ◽  
Iman Razeghian-Jahromi ◽  
Mehrab Sayadi ◽  
Firoozeh Abtahi
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Speckle Tracking ◽  
Speckle Tracking Echocardiography ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Fragmented Qrs

Abstract Background: The burden of cardiovascular diseases have been become a concerning health challenge throughout the world. Stopping this condition needs applying early, yet inexpensive diagnostic methods. The aim of this study is to evaluate the capacity of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on 12-lead EKG for detecting left ventricular dysfunction in healthy individuals.Methods: Out of 500 healthy participants without detected cardiovascular disorders from Shiraz Heart Study cohort, 20 subjects diagnosed with fQRS (case) and 20 peers without fQRS (control) were participated. Global longitudinal strain was measured by speckle tracking echocardiography for two groups. Comparison was made between case and control groups by using chi-square or independent sample t-test or ANOVA. P value of less than 5% considered statistical significance. Results: There was no difference between the case and the control groups in terms of age, gender, ejection fraction, left ventricular volume and dimensions. Out of 40 subjects, 14 had reduced GLS (≤20%) with 10 of them had fQRS. GLS in the case group was significantly lower than in the control group.Conclusions: Apparent healthy subjects with fQRS diagnosed with left ventricular systolic dysfunction with respect to GLS despite normal ejection fraction. It seems that EKG, as one of the simplest way toward assessing heart function, could be a prominent informative clue to detect high-risk individuals among healthy population in advance.

scholarly journals Central and obstructive apneas prevalence in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Borrelli ◽  
P Sciarrone ◽  
F Gentile ◽  
N Ghionzoli ◽  
G Mirizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
2D Echocardiography

Abstract Background Central apneas (CA) and obstructive apneas (OA) are highly prevalent in heart failure (HF) both with reduced and preserved systolic function. However, a comprehensive evaluation of apnea prevalence across HF according to ejection fraction (i.e HF with patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction- HFrEf, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively) throughout the 24 hours has never been done before. Materials and methods 700 HF patients were prospectively enrolled and then divided according to left ventricular EF (408 HFrEF, 117 HFmrEF, 175 HFpEF). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation including: 2D echocardiography; 24-h Holter-ECG monitoring; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; neuro-hormonal assessment and 24-h cardiorespiratory monitoring. Results In the whole population, prevalence of normal breathing (NB), CA and OA at daytime was 40%, 51%, and 9%, respectively, while at nighttime 15%, 55%, and 30%, respectively. When stratified according to left ventricular EF, CA prevalence decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF and HFpEF: (daytime CA: 57% vs. 43% vs. 42%, respectively, p=0.001; nighttime CA: 66% vs. 48% vs. 34%, respectively, p<0.0001), while OA prevalence increased (daytime OA: 5% vs. 8% vs. 18%, respectively, p<0.0001; nighttime OA: 20 vs. 29 vs. 53%, respectively, p<0.0001). When assessing moderte-severe apneas, defined with an apnea/hypopnea index >15 events/hour, prevalence of CA was again higher in HFrEF than HFmrEF and HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe CA: 28% vs. 19% and 23%, respectively, p<0.05) and at nighttime (nighttime moderate-severe CA: 50% vs. 39% and 28%, respectively, p<0.05). Conversely, moderate-severe OA decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF to HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe OA: 1% vs. 3% and 8%, respectively, p<0.05) and nighttime (noghttime moderate-severe OA: 10% vs. 11% and 30%, respectively, p<0.05). Conclusions Daytime and nighttime apneas, both central and obstructive in nature, are highly prevalent in HF regardless of EF. Across the whole spectrum of HF, CA prevalence increases and OA decreases as left ventricular systolic dysfunction progresses, both during daytime and nighttime. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document