scholarly journals First systematic experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for de-novo mutations

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Rechitsky ◽  
Ekaterina Pomerantseva ◽  
Tatiana Pakhalchuk ◽  
Dana Pauling ◽  
Oleg Verlinsky ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. e149
Author(s):  
K. McWilliams ◽  
T.K. McWilliams ◽  
J. Kitchen ◽  
M. Hughes

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 3225-3229 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Altarescu ◽  
T. Eldar-Geva ◽  
I. Varshower ◽  
B. Brooks ◽  
E. Z. Haran ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 770-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carles Giménez ◽  
Jonás Sarasa ◽  
César Arjona ◽  
Ester Vilamajó ◽  
Olga Martínez-Pasarell ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Fernandez-Marmiesse ◽  
Sofia Gouveia ◽  
Maria L. Couce

Approximately 25-50 million Americans, 30 million Europeans, and 8% of the Australian population have a rare disease. Rare diseases are thus a common problem for clinicians and account for enormous healthcare costs worldwide due to the difficulty of establishing a specific diagnosis. In this article, we review the milestones achieved in our understanding of rare diseases since the emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and analyze how these advances have influenced research and diagnosis. The first half of this review describes how NGS has changed diagnostic workflows and provided an unprecedented, simple way of discovering novel disease-associated genes. We focus particularly on metabolic and neurodevelopmental disorders. NGS has enabled cheap and rapid genetic diagnosis, highlighted the relevance of mosaic and de novo mutations, brought to light the wide phenotypic spectrum of most genes, detected digenic inheritance or the presence of more than one rare disease in the same patient, and paved the way for promising new therapies. In the second part of the review, we look at the limitations and challenges of NGS, including determination of variant causality, the loss of variants in coding and non-coding regions, and the detection of somatic mosaicism variants and epigenetic mutations, and discuss how these can be overcome in the near future.


Author(s):  
Jahnavi Aluri ◽  
Megan A. Cooper

AbstractInborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders due to genetic defects in the immune response that have a broad clinical spectrum. Diagnosis of the precise genetic cause of IEI has led to improved care and treatment of patients; however, genetic diagnosis using standard approaches is only successful in ~40% of patients and is particularly challenging in “sporadic” cases without a family history. Standard genetic testing for IEI evaluates for germline changes in genes encoding proteins important for the immune response. It is now clear that IEI can also arise from de novo mutations leading to genetic variants present in germ cells and/or somatic cells. In particular, somatic mosaicism, i.e., post-zygotic genetic changes in DNA sequence, is emerging as a significant contributor to IEI. Testing for somatic mosaicism can be challenging, and both older sequencing techniques such as Sanger sequencing and newer next-generation sequencing may not be sensitive enough to detect variants depending on the platform and analysis tools used. Investigation of multiple tissue samples and specifically targeting sequence technologies to detect low frequency variants is important for detection of variants. This review examines the role and functional consequences of genetic mosaicism in IEI. We emphasize the need to refine the current exome and genome analysis pipeline to efficiently identify mosaic variants and recommend considering somatic mosaicism in disease discovery and in the first-tier of genetic analysis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Fan ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
Jihong Wu ◽  
Chao Gao ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Congenital cataract (CC) is a significant cause of lifelong visual loss. Its genetic diagnosis is challenging due to marked genetic heterogeneity. The purpose of this article is to report the genetic findings in sporadic and familial CC patients.Methods Patients (n=54) who were clinically diagnosed with CC and their parents were recruited. Blood samples were collected in our hospital. Mutations were detected by high-throughput, next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) targeting 792 genes frequently involved in common inherited eye diseases.Results We identified variants in 11/38 cases (28.95%) of sporadic CC and 14/16 cases (87.5%) of familial CC, indicating a significant difference (P=0.000). Of the 14 variants identified in sporadic cases, 9 were previously reported mutations, and 5 were novel mutations, including 2 de novo mutations (CRYBB2 c.487C>T, FYCO1c.215A>T). The most frequent variants in our cohort were in crystallins and cytoskeletal genes (7/30, 23.33%), followed by X-linked syndromic proteins (13.33%) and transcriptional factors (10.00%). Additional information on the possibility of complications with inherited ocular or systemic diseases other than CC was provided in 20/30 (66.67%) variants.Conclusions These results contribute to expanding the mutation spectrum and frequency. Targeted NGS in CC provided significant diagnostic information and enabled more accurate genetic counseling. This study reports the different distributions of mutation genes in familial and sporadic CC cases.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 560
Author(s):  
Ana Arteche-López ◽  
Maria José Gómez Rodríguez ◽  
Maria Teresa Sánchez Calvin ◽  
Juan Francisco Quesada-Espinosa ◽  
Jose Miguel Lezana Rosales ◽  
...  

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a prevalent and extremely heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) with a strong genetic component. In recent years, the clinical relevance of de novo mutations to the aetiology of ASD has been demonstrated. Current guidelines recommend chromosomal microarray (CMA) and a FMR1 testing as first-tier tests, but there is increasing evidence that support the use of NGS for the diagnosis of NDDs. Specifically in ASD, it has not been extensively evaluated and, thus, we performed and compared the clinical utility of CMA, FMR1 testing, and/or whole exome sequencing (WES) in a cohort of 343 ASD patients. We achieved a global diagnostic rate of 12.8% (44/343), the majority of them being characterised by WES (33/44; 75%) compared to CMA (9/44; 20.4%) or FMR1 testing (2/44; 4.5%). Taking into account the age at which genetic testing was carried out, we identified a causal genetic alteration in 22.5% (37/164) of patients over 5 years old, but only in 3.9% (7/179) of patients under this age. Our data evidence the higher diagnostic power of WES compared to CMA in the study of ASD and support the implementation of WES as a first-tier test for the genetic diagnosis of this disorder, when there is no suspicion of fragile X syndrome.


Author(s):  
Alejandro de Dios ◽  
◽  
Sofia Irene Trobo ◽  
Anette Marianne Prior Gjesing ◽  
Torben Hansen ◽  
...  

Introduction: people with clinical characteristics of MODY benefit with a correct genetic diagnosis and are often only studied if having family history. In this work there were studied four people selected per their clinical characteristics of genitourinary abnormalities and MODY Diabetes, using the worldwide inclusion criteria for MODY5 except for a family history of diabetes or kidney disease. Methods: gene mutation screening in four people with clinical characteristics of MODY5 in search for alterations in the HNF1B gene with Sanger or NGS sequencing, and bioinformatic tools to analyze the results of the sequences. Results: from four people studied we found three mutations in the HNF1B gene, including a missense mutation previously described and two de novo whole gene deletions. The other person did not present any alteration in that gene even having clinical characteristics. Conclusions: people with clinical characteristics of MODY and having pancreatic, renal, kidney or genital located abnormalities are candidates for genetic screening of HNF1B. Yet, genetic screening of HNF1B should not only be restricted to such people but should also be considered in people without diabetes but having those other characteristics. We suggest also, the study of people even in the absence of family history, given that the possibility of occurrence of de novo mutations is underestimated.


2011 ◽  
Vol 152 (11) ◽  
pp. 415-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noémi Polgár ◽  
Katalin Komlósi ◽  
Kinga Hadzsiev ◽  
Tamás Illés ◽  
Béla Melegh

Type 1 neurofibromatosis is an autosomal dominant hamartosis, caused by mutations of the gene neurofibromin-1. The variable clinical phenotype is characterized by café-au-lait spots, benign neurofibromas, axillary, inguinal hyperpigmentations, iris hamartomas, skeletal deformities and risk of neurofibroma-development. Pathogenic variations of neurofibromin-1 arise as de novo mutations in approx. 50% of the cases. Aims: Molecular genetic testing of neurofibromin-1 gene has been performed in our department since 2008; the following report summarizes our experiences. Methods: 40 patients, presenting symptoms of type 1 neurofibromatosis, were screened by sequencing or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Results: Pathogenic alterations were identified in 31 cases, 8 patients presented novel mutations. In 8 affected, no mutations were detected by sequencing; one of these patients had a deletion affecting the entire gene. Conclusions: Sequencing of the neurofibromin-1 gene and screening for rearrangements are useful in identifying pathogenic alterations in most of the cases. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 415–419.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document