Late Pleistocene intensification technologies in Northern China

2011 ◽  
Vol 242 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Elston ◽  
Dong Guanghui ◽  
Zhang Dongju
1999 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 646-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangrong Dong ◽  
Zhizhu Su ◽  
Heling Jin

2014 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Xing ◽  
María Martinón-Torres ◽  
Jose María Bermúdez de Castro ◽  
Xiujie Wu ◽  
Wu Liu

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 102-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong He ◽  
Jie Zhou ◽  
ZhongPing Lai ◽  
LinHai Yang ◽  
JianMin Liang ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 23-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myra Shackley

This short paper summarizes current knowledge concerning the palaeolithic archaeology of the Mongolian People's Republic (‘Outer Mongolia’), although the paucity of well-documented assemblages and stratified sites makes it impossible to do more than comment on the nature of the material. A few early sites can be assigned to the Acheulean technocomplex and the Kazantsevo interglacial, but there is a more extensive group of surface middle palaeolithic assemblages in the Altai-Gobi area with close and dated typological parallels in northern China. At some of these localities, for example Arts Bogd in the southern Gobi, the first beginnings of the microblade tradition which characterizes the later Shabarakh complex of sites may be seen. These later sites, which form part of a remarkably uniform circumpolar epipalaeolithic dating to between 20–11,000 BP, are associated with the gradual Late Pleistocene desertification of the Gobi.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilian Sheng ◽  
Jiaming Hu ◽  
Haowen Tong ◽  
Bastien Llamas ◽  
Junxia Yuan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ofer Bar-Yosef ◽  
Fiona Coward ◽  
Robert Hosfield ◽  
Matt Pope ◽  
Francis Wenban-Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document