Clinical evaluation of interfractional variations for whole breast radiotherapy using 3-dimensional surface imaging

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amish P. Shah ◽  
Tomas Dvorak ◽  
Michael S. Curry ◽  
Daniel J. Buchholz ◽  
Sanford L. Meeks
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Surface Imaging ◽  
Breast Radiotherapy ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Whole Breast Radiotherapy ◽  
Dimensional Surface

scholarly journals A comparison of volume and anthropometric breast measurements using the Crisalix and VECTRA XT 3-dimensional surface imaging systems in women who have undergone breast-conserving surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid MBChB ◽  
Rachel Connell ◽  
Stephanie Dean ◽  
Rosa Micco ◽  
Naser Alotaibi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
Surface Imaging ◽  
Breast Volume ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Sternal Notch ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dimensional Surface

Introduction Three-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) of the breasts enables the measurement of anthropometric distances and breast volume. These measurements may be used in surgical planning and to facilitate clear communication with patients. The aim of this study was to compare measurements using a portable 3D-SI system, Crisalix, with a more established non-mobile camera, the VECTRA XT. Methods Participants were imaged three times using the Crisalix and the VECTRA XT system. Breast volume, sternal notch to nipple distance, nipple to nipple distance and breast width were measured. Intra-observer agreement was measured using the co-efficient of variation (CV). Agreement between the two methods was represented with Bland Altman agreement plots. Results Intra-method variation was low for both methods (maximum CV 3.3% for Crisalix and 3.2% for VECTRA XT), with only nipple-to-nipple distance being statistically significant, marginally in favour of VECTRA. The mean inter-method differences were small but the limits of agreement (LoA) were wide for all parameters: best for sternal notch to nipple distance, mean difference (MD) -0.03cm and LoA 1.8 to -1.8cm; the widest LoA were for breast volume: MD 31.1cm3 and LoA 286.7 to -244.6cm3. Conclusion This is the first comparison of anthropometric distances and breast volume measured using the two most widely used 3D-SI systems, Crisalix and VECTRA XT. Intra-method variation is low but currently it would not be appropriate to use the two systems interchangeably due to the wide limits of agreement for all four parameters assessed.

scholarly journals DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Using 3-dimensional Surface Imaging and a Printed Mold

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Tomita ◽  
Kenji Yano ◽  
Yuki Hata ◽  
Akimitsu Nishibayashi ◽  
Ko Hosokawa
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Surface Imaging ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Surface

Prediction of Breast Resection Weight in Reduction Mammaplasty Based on 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Eder ◽  
Ariane Grabhorn ◽  
Fee v. Waldenfels ◽  
Tibor Schuster ◽  
Nikolaos A. Papadopulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reduction Mammaplasty ◽  
Surface Imaging ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Surface

Assessing the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging System in Breast Volume Estimation

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. S311-S317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Kwong ◽  
Jonathan David Tijerina ◽  
Sara Choi ◽  
Anna Luan ◽  
Carol L. Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Imaging System ◽  
Volume Estimation ◽  
Surface Imaging ◽  
Breast Volume ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Surface

scholarly journals Reliability of 3‐dimensional surface imaging of the face using a whole‐body surface scanner

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya Xu ◽  
Konstantin Frank ◽  
Lukas Kohler ◽  
Denis Ehrl ◽  
Michael Alfertshofer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Surface ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Surface Imaging ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
The Face ◽  
Dimensional Surface
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document