Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-335.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Tsirogiannis ◽  
Daniel R. Reissmann ◽  
Guido Heydecke
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Single Unit ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complete Coverage ◽  
Marginal Fit ◽  
Ceramic Restorations

CAD/CAM or conventional ceramic restorations longevity: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. e29 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A.D. Coelho ◽  
S.B. Rodrigues ◽  
P. Franken ◽  
R.K. Celeste ◽  
V.C.B. Leitune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Ceramic Restorations

scholarly journals Reliability of Metal 3D Printing with Respect to the Marginal Fit of Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 4781
Author(s):  
Soohyun Bae ◽  
Min-Ho Hong ◽  
Hyunwoo Lee ◽  
Cheong-Hee Lee ◽  
Mihee Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Marginal Fit ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Standard Mean Difference ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Metal 3D Printing

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies have been widely used to manufacture crowns and frameworks for fixed dental prostheses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the reliability of the marginal fit of 3D-printed cobalt-chromium-based fixed dental prostheses in comparison to conventional casting methods. Articles published until 25 June 2020, reporting the marginal fit of fixed prostheses fabricated with metal 3D printing, were searched using electronic literature databases. After the screening and quality assessment, 21 eligible peer-reviewed articles were selected. Meta-analysis revealed that the marginal gap of the prostheses manufactured using 3D printing was significantly smaller compared to that manufactured using casting methods (standard mean difference (95% CI): −0.92 (−1.45, −0.38); Z = −3.37; p = 0.0008). The estimated difference between the single and multi-unit types did not differ significantly (p = 0.3573). In the subgroup analysis for the measurement methods, the tendency of marginal discrepancy between the 3D printing and casting groups was significantly different between articles that used direct observation and those that used the silicone replica technique (p < 0.001). Metal 3D printing technologies appear reliable as an alternative to casting methods in terms of the fit of the fixed dental prostheses. In order to analyze the factors influencing manufacturing and confirm the results of this review, further controlled laboratory and clinical studies are required.

Digital versus conventional workflow for the fabrication of multiunit fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vertical marginal fit in controlled in vitro studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 435-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucio Lo Russo ◽  
Giammarco Caradonna ◽  
Marco Biancardino ◽  
Alfredo De Lillo ◽  
Giuseppe Troiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Marginal Fit
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document