International Doctoral Education Partnership: The First Full-Time Doctoral Program for Nurses in China

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 354-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie T. Nolan ◽  
Huaping Liu ◽  
Zheng Li ◽  
Chongmei Lu ◽  
Martha N. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Full Time

scholarly journals Doctoral Preparation Influence on New Faculty's Perception of Role Transition

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianne F. Kilbourne ◽  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Thomas G. Bowman
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Phenomenological Study ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Faculty Role ◽  
Faculty Position ◽  
Doctoral Preparation ◽  
National Athletic Trainers Association

Context: Teaching, scholarship, and service are required of all faculty in order to earn tenure. Faculty members hired directly from doctoral programs may not be adequately prepared to face the responsibilities of a full-time position in the professoriate. Objective: To explore what mechanisms as part of doctoral education influenced the perceptions of junior faculty development while transitioning postgraduation. Design: Qualitative phenomenological study. Setting: Fourteen higher education institutions. Patients or Other Participants: Sixteen junior faculty (7 male, 9 female, age = 32 ± 3.5 years) representing 7 National Athletic Trainers' Association districts participated. At the time of the interview, participants were within their first 3 years of a full-time faculty position. All participants earned doctorates from residential programs and had an assistantship position. Main Outcome Measure(s): All participants completed a semistructured telephone interview. The interview guide was focused on the experiences of junior faculty within their first 3 years in a tenure-track position. Questions were grounded within the literature and purpose of the study. We analyzed the interviews through a psychosocial developmental lens using a general inductive approach. Results: Two themes of doctoral preparation emerged that influenced the perceptions of junior faculty transitioning into a faculty role: breadth and depth of the doctoral assistantship and doctoral coursework related to academia. Doctoral assistantships with breadth and depth helped participants develop competence, while doctoral coursework related to academia provided content expertise. Conclusions: Doctoral education is the platform for transition into academia. Our findings suggest that doctoral program assistantships that provided both breadth and depth of experience facilitated transition. Coursework related to academia influenced perceptions of transition into the faculty role by exposing participants to pedagogy and higher education infrastructure.

scholarly journals Researching the Research: Applying Machine Learning Techniques to Dissertation Classification

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanna Schmeelk
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Manual Classification ◽  
Machine Learning Tool

This research examines industry-based dissertation research in a doctoral computing program through the lens of machine learning algorithms to understand topics explored by senior and experienced full-time working professionals (EFWPs).  Our research categorizes dissertation by both their abstracts and by their full-text using the Graplab Create library from Apple’s Turi. We also compare the dissertation categorizations using IBM’s Watson Discovery deep machine learning tool.  Our research provides perspectives on the practicality of the manual classification of technical documents; and, it provides insights into the: (1) categories of academic work created by EFWPs in a Computing doctoral program, (2) viability of automated categorization versus human abstraction, and (3) differences in categorization algorithms.

Seton Hall University Doctor of Science Degree Program

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15
Author(s):  
Janet Koehnke ◽  
Joan Besing ◽  
Kelly Shea-Miller ◽  
Brett Martin
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Science Degree ◽  
Course Work ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Clinical Practica ◽  
The University

This article provides an overview of the clinical doctoral program in audiology at Seton Hall University. It is a full-time, 4-year program that includes academic course work, clinical practica, and research experience. In concert with the university mission, the program is designed to enable students to develop the skills they need to be leaders in the field of audiology, providing assessment and intervention to individuals with hearing problems and enhancing the knowledge base of the profession. As part of the School of Graduate Medical Education, students in the program have access to a wealth of resources in related health professions. The close proximity to New York City provides many opportunities for outstanding clinical education with a diverse population.

A New Partnership in Doctoral Education in Business Administration

2018 ◽  
pp. 1450-1468
Author(s):  
Florence Richman ◽  
Brian W. Sloboda
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Doctoral Degree ◽  
Business Administration ◽  
Business Training ◽  
Dissemination Of Research ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Support Students

The existence of doctoral programs in business since the 1960s has advanced the knowledge of business both academically and practically that enabled a wide dissemination of research in management, finance, accounting, marketing, and leadership. However, pursuing a doctoral degree in business should support students pursuing a range of professional paths that includes positions in academia and outside of academia. That is, training in doctoral business training should encourage doctoral business students to develop new career paths that bridges business and the academy. Despite the selection of the traditional or the professional doctoral degree, the expectations of the graduates differ, and these expectations affect the administration of the doctoral program. The focus of this chapter is to examine the need for an evolution of doctoral education models in business administration to make the doctoral education more accessible while providing high quality teaching and research to business schools and making societal contributions.

A New Partnership in Doctoral Education in Business Administration

2017 ◽  
pp. 198-216
Author(s):  
Florence Richman ◽  
Brian W. Sloboda
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Doctoral Degree ◽  
Business Administration ◽  
Business Training ◽  
Dissemination Of Research ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Support Students

The existence of doctoral programs in business since the 1960s has advanced the knowledge of business both academically and practically that enabled a wide dissemination of research in management, finance, accounting, marketing, and leadership. However, pursuing a doctoral degree in business should support students pursuing a range of professional paths that includes positions in academia and outside of academia. That is, training in doctoral business training should encourage doctoral business students to develop new career paths that bridges business and the academy. Despite the selection of the traditional or the professional doctoral degree, the expectations of the graduates differ, and these expectations affect the administration of the doctoral program. The focus of this chapter is to examine the need for an evolution of doctoral education models in business administration to make the doctoral education more accessible while providing high quality teaching and research to business schools and making societal contributions.

A Doctoral Program for the Working Psychologist

1989 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-210
Author(s):  
Robert W. Motta ◽  
Julia R. Vane
Keyword(s):  
Training Program ◽  
Community Psychology ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
School Community ◽  
Controversial Issue ◽  
Doctoral Training ◽  
Master's Level ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Tier System ◽  
Full Time Employment

The doctoral program in School-Community Psychology at Hofstra University was designed to permit master's-level psychologists to enter a doctoral training program without giving up their full-time employment. Classes within the program take place on Saturdays, evenings and during the summer. This program helps to address the problem of the two-tier system of MAs and Ph.D. psychologists which is viewed as a highly controversial issue for the profession of psychology. The program has been enthusiastically supported by graduates who feel that they have benefited a great deal by obtaining their doctorates.

Social work doctoral education: Are doctoral students being prepared to teach?

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandy R Maynard ◽  
Elizabeth M Labuzienski ◽  
Kristina S Lind ◽  
Andrew H Berglund ◽  
David L Albright
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
The United States ◽  
Social Work Practice ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Course Content ◽  
Social Work Practitioners

Summary Longstanding tensions exist around the purpose of social work doctoral programs, particularly around the extent to which doctoral program should prepare their students to teach. Indeed, social work programs in the United States have been criticized for failing to prepare graduates for teaching; however, it has been a number of years since doctoral curricula have been reviewed. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which US social work doctoral programs are training their students to teach by assessing the extent to which pedagogical training is explicitly integrated into doctoral curricula and examining the scope and content of required doctoral courses on teaching. Content analysis of social work doctoral program curricula ( n = 72) and teaching and learning related course syllabi ( n = 24) was conducted by two coders. Syllabi were coded and analyzed to produce a profile of course objectives, readings, teaching strategies, assessment methods, and course content. Findings Of the 72 PhD programs, 90% included a goal related to the preparation of their students for teaching; however, only 37 (51%) required a course on teaching. Course content, teaching, and assessment methods were found to vary across courses. Applications Training the next generation of social work practitioners to engage in effective social work practice is critical to the profession; however, the preparation of doctoral students to provide quality education to future social work practitioners seems to be largely neglected. Implications for doctoral education are discussed.

Mentor support systems in a doctoral mentoring program

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-327
Author(s):  
Rachel Louise Geesa ◽  
Kat R. McConnell ◽  
Nicholas Patrick Elam ◽  
Ellie Clark
Keyword(s):  
Support Systems ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Mentoring Programs ◽  
Mentoring Program ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Group Mentoring ◽  
Mentor Support ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Academic Year

Purpose Education doctoral (EdD) students (mentees) typically hold full-time leadership positions in education-related fields while completing their degree. The types of support these scholar-practitioners need is unique because of their focus on balancing full-time work, academic, and personal needs. This study aims to explore mentor support systems for mentees in their first and second year of the EdD program through a group mentoring program, which is designed to provide resources and access to mentors to promote successful degree completion in five years or less. Design/methodology/approach Mentors participated in monthly presentations and discussions with mentees throughout the 2018–2019 academic year, which were video recorded. At the end of the academic year, mentors partook in an interview or focus group meeting. Findings Themes emerged related to mentors’ focus on the dissertation process; emphasis on outreach for support; discussions and work/life balance; selection of presentation topics; perceptions of networking opportunities with mentees; desire to build stronger connections with mentees; and concerns/opinions about the mentoring format. Research limitations/implications The design of a mentoring program for EdD mentees varies throughout the doctorate degree pathway. Mentors support mentees in their doctoral journey through presentations and discussions about relevant topics during their first two years in the doctoral program. Additional studies are needed regarding EdD mentoring programs for students in the third year to the completion of the degree. Originality/value Few studies exist related to mentoring programs for scholar-practitioners in EdD programs. Results from this research provide EdD faculty and advisors insights to group mentoring and discussion topics for first and second year EdD students, based on the mentors’ perspectives.

scholarly journals Key Aspects of Modernizing Public Health Doctoral Program at The University of Georgia

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Lobjanidze ◽  
G Kamkamidze ◽  
K Antia
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Focus Group Discussion ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Consultation Model ◽  
The University ◽  
Phd Program

Abstract Structured Doctoral Program of Public Health has been modernized from “consultation” to combined “Multi-methods” teaching module at the University of Full PhD program consists of 180 ECTS, 3 years for the full-time, and maximum of 7 years for the part-time. The programme consists of 60 teaching and 120 ECTS Research component. Doctoral student, together with a supervisor, starts working on his/her dissertation from the 1st academic year/semester of enrollment Transition from “consultation” model to the “combined multi-methods” model advances the learning outcomes, straight research skills, internationalization, modern professional communication. PH PhD Program aims to prepare a public health researcher who will be able to identify and solve public health issue/problem, produce the best evidence possible and make an evidence-based decisions, create a novelty, and expand the knowledge borders of public health. Self-administrated semi-structured questionnaire were used: How much “consultation” model is effective? What kind of skills are is necessary for scientific carrier?Focus-group discussion was conducted with PhD program graduates. Questions discussed: How you applied acquired skills and knowledge to your work/practice?In focus group discussion employers were asked to discuss what skills and knowledge they are requiring from the employees, if they are considering involvement of local and International experts in teaching process. 98 % of questionnaire students underline the Combined multy- methods with intensive theoretical and practical teaching with international activities. The deep knowledge of scientific methods and project writing skills are very important. Results of researches must be presented at the international scientific conferences and published. Research methods course was improved (amounts of credits was increased 2 times).The frame of teaching is Combined multy-methods with internationalization involvement and with intensive timeline. Key messages The learning process consist of Combined multy-method, with deep research methods and internationalization activities. The elements of Research component starts from the 1st semester. Result Internationalization.

Preparing for dissertation writing: doctoral education students’ perceptions

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katia Ciampa ◽  
Zora Wolfe
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Academic Writing ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Pedagogical Practices ◽  
Self Directed Learning ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Dissertation Writing ◽  
Directed Learning

Purpose This paper aims to investigate doctoral students’ perceptions of and satisfaction with their doctor of education program, specifically related to dissertation writing preparation. The results offer a complex picture that has implications for the design of doctoral education programs that aim to help students prepare for culminating academic writing products such as dissertations. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative data, by means of an anonymous online survey with open-ended questions, were used to ascertain 115 doctoral students’ writing experiences in a doctoral program at one university in the USA. Findings The findings of this study suggest the importance of intrapersonal factors, specifically the ability to engage in self-directed learning; interpersonal factors, such as peer and faculty support; and institutional factors, namely, faculty’s writing-based pedagogical practices, in supporting doctoral students’ academic writing. Practical implications This study suggests in addition to selecting and nurturing students’ ability to engage in self-directed learning, there are a number of specific strategies and practices doctoral faculty can engage in and use to prepare students for successful dissertation writing. Originality/value This study provides the perspective of former and existing doctoral students to illuminate the needs they perceive as they engage in dissertation writing. The study provides practical strategies based on common themes in student responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document