Developing a Research-Active Clinical Environment Within the Emergency Department: A Case Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerri Holzhauser ◽  
Marie Cooke ◽  
Sarah Winch ◽  
Julie Finucane ◽  
Cathy Davis
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Environment

scholarly journals Quality improvement primer part 2: executing a quality improvement project in the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas B. Chartier ◽  
Antonia S. Stang ◽  
Samuel Vaillancourt ◽  
Amy H. Y. Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Emergency Department Setting ◽  
Pdsa Cycle ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
Final Article

ABSTRACTThe topics of quality improvement (QI) and patient safety have become important themes in health care in recent years, particularly in the emergency department setting, which is a frequent point of contact with the health care system for patients. In the first of three articles in this series meant as a QI primer for emergency medicine clinicians, we introduced the strategic planning required to develop an effective QI project using a fictional case study as an example. In this second article we continue with our example of improving time to antibiotics for patients with sepsis, and introduce the Model for Improvement. We will review what makes a good aim statement, the various categories of measures that can be tracked during a QI project, and the relative merits and challenges of potential change concepts and ideas. We will also present the Model for Improvement’s rapid-cycle change methodology, the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The final article in this series will focus on the evaluation and sustainability of QI projects.

Validating the primary provider theory in emergency medicine

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Guarisco ◽  
Stefoni A. Bavin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Pay For Performance ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Business Success ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a case study testing the Primary Provider Theory proposed by Aragon that states that: disproportionate to any other variables, patient satisfaction is distinctly and primarily linked to physician behaviors and secondarily to waiting times.Design/methodology/approachThe case study began by creating incentives motivating physicians to reflect and improve behaviors (patient interactions) and practice patterns (workflow efficiency). The Press Ganey Emergency Department Survey was then utilized to track the impact of the incentive programs and to ascertain any relationship between patient satisfaction with the provider and global patient satisfaction with emergency department visits by measuring patient satisfaction over an eight quarter period.FindingsThe findings were two‐fold: firstly, the concept of “pay for performance” as a tool for physician motivation was valid; and secondly, the impact on global patient satisfaction by increases in patient satisfaction with the primary provider was significant and highly correlated, as proposed by Aragon.Practical implicationsThese findings can encourage hospitals and physician groups to place a high value on the performance of primary providers of patient care, provide incentives for appropriate provider behaviors through “pay for performance” programs and promote physician understanding of the links between global patient satisfaction with physician behaviors and business growth, malpractice reduction, and other key measures of business success.Originality/valueThere are no other case studies prior to this project validating the Primary Provider Theory in an urban medical center; this project adds to the validity and credibility of the theory in this setting.

scholarly journals Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in an Emergency Department and Ambulatory Testing Locations

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S126-S126
Author(s):  
C Attaway ◽  
F El-Sharkawy Navarro ◽  
M Richard-Greenblatt ◽  
S Herlihy ◽  
C Gentile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Saliva Sample ◽  
Respiratory Viruses ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Emergency Department Patients ◽  
Positive Agreement

Abstract Introduction/Objective Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs have been the traditional specimen source used for testing for respiratory viruses. However, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies suggested that saliva could also be used as a specimen source for testing for SARS-CoV-2. Despite potential benefits, there was limited data on the characteristics of this specimen type and few commercial assays with FDA emergency use authorization allowed saliva as a specimen source. In order to explore the feasibility and validate using saliva as a specimen source for ambulatory and emergency department patients we designed a study to compare saliva to NP swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Methods/Case Report Specimens were collected in the emergency department and ambulatory testing sites between May 6, 2020-July 7, 2020. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected as part of routine clinical practice and patients were given written instructions to self-collect 1mL of saliva into a sterile specimen cup with or without a straw. SARS-CoV-2 testing was performed in parallel with both specimen types using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher Waltham, MA). Saliva was diluted 1:1 in saline prior to testing. Specimens were transported to the lab at 4C and frozen at -80C prior to testing. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Seventy-four patients had both an NP swab and saliva tested in this study. Thirty of the 74 patients (41%) were unable to produce the full 1mL of saliva requested, but all samples had sufficient volume for testing after dilution. There were 34 positive samples obtained with an 82% positive agreement between the NP swabs and saliva. In 6 cases, the NP swab was positive, and the paired saliva was negative. In 1 case, only the saliva was positive. The average Ct of the positive NP swabs with a paired negative saliva sample was 39.6. There was only a single invalid test for one of the saliva samples. Conclusion Saliva was a straightforward sample to collect and test for SARS-CoV-2. Challenges included obtaining sufficient sample and a less predictable matrix that required dilution to ensure proper pipeting. In this study, NP swabs were more sensitive for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Paired saliva was more often negative in patients shedding small amounts of SARS-CoV-2 based on a high Ct of the positive NP sample.

Incivility

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Intervention ◽  
Nurse Educator ◽  
Clinical Environment ◽  
Academic Setting ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Sole Purpose ◽  
Nursing Professionals ◽  
Insight Into

Nursing professionals experiencing incivility and bullying within the workplace are affected physically and emotionally. The sole purpose of the healthcare environment is to provide therapeutic intervention to the ill. Nurses should not anticipate going to work within healthcare facilities to be harassed, disrespected, and threatened. Be it a nurse working within a clinical environment or employed as a nurse educator in an academic setting, incivility and bullying can cause harm. Chapter 1 will provide an overview of the terms incivility and bullying. Uncivil conduct will be examined through a case study involving a perpetrator to provide insight into how a bully thinks and reacts with regard to their own behavior.

Relevance of using length of stay as a key indicator to monitor emergency department performance: Case study from a rural hospital in Thailand

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 646-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paibul Suriyawongpaisal ◽  
Threebhorn Kamlungkuea ◽  
Natchaya Chiawchantanakit ◽  
Norramon Charoenpipatsin ◽  
Phun Sriturawanit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Rural Hospital ◽  
Key Indicator

scholarly journals Measuring and Analyzing Waiting Time Indicators of Patients’ Admitted in Emergency Department: A Case Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Amina ◽  
Ahmad Barrati ◽  
Jamil Sadeghifar ◽  
Marzeyh Sharifi ◽  
Zahra Toulideh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Hospital Data ◽  
Governance System ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Average Waiting Time ◽  
Study Population

<p><strong>BACKGROUND</strong><strong> </strong><strong>&amp;</strong><strong> </strong><strong>AIMS:</strong> Measuring and analyzing of provided services times in Emergency Department is the way to improves quality of hospital services. The present study was conducted with aim measuring and analyzing patients waiting time indicators in Emergency Department in a general hospital in Iran.</p> <p><strong>MATERIAL</strong><strong> </strong><strong>&amp;</strong><strong> </strong><strong>METHODS:</strong> This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted during April to September 2012. The study population consisted of 72 patients admitted to the Emergency Department at Baharlo hospital. Data collection was carried out by workflow forms. Data were analyzed by t.<strong> </strong>test and ANOVA.</p> <p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> The average waiting time for patients from admission to enter the triage 5 minutes, the average time from triage to physician visit 6 minute and the average time between examinations to leave ED was estimated 180 minutes. The total waiting time in the emergency department was estimated at about 210 minutes. The significant<strong> </strong>correlation between marital status of patients (P=0.03), way of arrive to ED (P=0.02) and type of shift work (P=0.01) with studied time indicators were observed.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> According to results and comparing with similar studies, the average waiting time of patients admitted to the studied hospital is appropriate. Factors such as: Utilizing clinical governance system and attendance of resident Emergency Medicine Specialist have performed an important role in reducing of waiting times in ED.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document