scholarly journals Forward Modeling of the One-Way Acoustic Wave Equation by the Hartley Method

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1116-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Qiqiang
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Acoustic Wave ◽  
Forward Modeling ◽  
Acoustic Wave Equation ◽  
The One

A two‐way nonreflecting wave equation

Geophysics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edip Baysal ◽  
Dan D. Kosloff ◽  
J. W. C. Sherwood
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Acoustic Wave ◽  
Forward Modeling ◽  
Conventional Approach ◽  
Reflection Coefficients ◽  
Constant Density ◽  
Acoustic Wave Equation ◽  
Seismic Modeling ◽  
Homogeneous Regions ◽  
Dominant Direction

In seismic modeling and in migration it is often desirable to use a wave equation (with varying velocity but constant density) which does not produce interlayer reverberations. The conventional approach has been to use a one‐way wave equation which allows energy to propagate in one dominant direction only, typically this direction being either upward or downward (Claerbout, 1972). We introduce a two‐way wave equation which gives highly reduced reflection coefficients for transmission across material boundaries. For homogeneous regions of space, however, this wave equation becomes identical to the full acoustic wave equation. Possible applications of this wave equation for forward modeling and for migration are illustrated with simple models.

Modified imaging principle: An alternative to preserved-amplitude least-squares wave-equation migration

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. S221-S230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Kiyashchenko ◽  
René-Edouard Plessix ◽  
Boris Kashtan
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Finite Difference ◽  
Acoustic Wave ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Forward Modeling ◽  
Acoustic Wave Equation ◽  
Impedance Contrast ◽  
Least Squares Migration

Impedance contrast images can result from a least-squares migration or from a modified imaging principle. Theoretically, the two approaches should give similar results, but in practice they lead to different estimates of the impedance contrasts because of limited acquisition geometry, difficulty in computing exact weights for least-squares migration, and small contrast approximation. To analyze those differences, we compare the two approaches based on 2D synthetics. Forward modeling is either a finite-difference solver of the full acoustic wave equation or a one-way wave-equation solver that correctly models the amplitudes. The modified imaging principle provides better amplitude estimates of the impedance contrasts and does not suffer from the artifacts at-tributable to diving waves, which can be seen in two-way, least-squares migrated sections. However, because of the shot-based formulation, artifacts appear in the modified imaging principle results in shadow zones where energy is defocused. Those artifacts do not exist with the least-squares migration algorithm because all shots are processed simultane-ously.

A brief comparison of some Kirchhoff integral formulas for migration and inversion

Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1164-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Docherty
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Acoustic Wave ◽  
Reflection Coefficients ◽  
Acoustic Wave Equation ◽  
Inversion Formulas ◽  
Kirchhoff Migration ◽  
Integral Formulas ◽  
The One ◽  
And Inversion ◽  
Kirchhoff Integral

Kirchhoff migration has traditionally been viewed as an imaging procedure. Usually, few claims are made regarding the amplitudes in the imaged section. In recent years, a number of inversion formulas, similar in form to those of Kirchhoff migration, have been proposed. A Kirchhoff‐type inversion produces not only an image but also an estimate of velocity variations, or perhaps reflection coefficients. The estimate is obtained from the peak amplitudes in the image. In this paper prestack Kirchhoff migration and inversion formulas for the one‐parameter acoustic wave equation are compared. Following a heuristic approach based on the imaging principle, a migration formula is derived which turns out to be identical to one proposed by Bleistein for inversion. Prestack Kirchhoff migration and inversion are, thus, seen to be the same—both in terms of the image produced and the peak amplitudes of the output.

Obtaining three‐dimensional velocity information directly from reflection seismic data: An inverse scattering formalism

Geophysics ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1116-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. Weglein ◽  
W. E. Boyse ◽  
J. E. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Acoustic Wave ◽  
Inverse Scattering ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Quantum Scattering ◽  
Acoustic Wave Equation ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
The One

We present a formalism for obtaining the subsurface velocity configuration directly from reflection seismic data. Our approach is to apply the results obtained for inverse problems in quantum scattering theory to the reflection seismic problem. In particular, we extend the results of Moses (1956) for inverse quantum scattering and Razavy (1975) for the one‐dimensional (1-D) identification of the acoustic wave equation to the problem of identifying the velocity in the three‐dimensional (3-D) acoustic wave equation from boundary value measurements. No a priori knowledge of the subsurface velocity is assumed and all refraction, diffraction, and multiple reflection phenomena are taken into account. In addition, we explain how the idea of slant stack in processing seismic data is an important part of the proposed 3-D inverse scattering formalism.

Computing Where Perturbations Affect the Acoustic Impulse Response in the Ocean

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850004
Author(s):  
John L. Spiesberger ◽  
Dmitry Yu Mikhin
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Acoustic Wave ◽  
Impulse Response ◽  
Sound Speed ◽  
Acoustic Signals ◽  
Technological Advance ◽  
Propagation Model ◽  
Acoustic Wave Equation ◽  
Finite Frequency ◽  
The One

We compute accurate maps of oceanic perturbations affecting transient acoustic signals propagating from source to receiver. The technological advance involves coupling the one-way wave equation (OWWE) propagation model with the theory for the Differential Measure of Influence (DMI) yielding the map. The DMI requires two finite-frequency solutions of the acoustic wave equation obeying reciprocity: from source to receiver and vice versa. OWWE satisfies reciprocity at basin-scales with sound speed varying horizontally and vertically. At infinite frequency, maps of the DMI collapse into rays. Mapping the DMI is useful for understanding measurements of acoustic perturbations at finite frequencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document