scholarly journals Surface Formation Study Using a 3-D Explicit Finite Element Model of Machining of Gray Cast Iron

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 111-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Odum ◽  
Masakazu Soshi
2013 ◽  
Vol 554-557 ◽  
pp. 484-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Petrov ◽  
James A. Sherwood ◽  
Konstantine A. Fetfatsidis ◽  
Cynthia J. Mitchell

A hybrid finite element discrete mesoscopic approach is used to model the forming of composite parts using a unidirectional glass prepreg non-crimp fabric (NCF). The tensile behavior of the fabric is represented using 1-D beam elements, and the shearing behavior is captured using 2-D shell elements into an ABAQUS/Explicit finite element model via a user-defined material subroutine. The forming of a hemisphere is simulated using a finite element model of the fabric, and the results are compared to a thermostamped part as a demonstration of the capabilities of the used methodology. Forming simulations using a double-dome geometry, which has been used in an international benchmarking program, were then performed with the validated finite element model to explore the ability of the unidirectional fabric to accommodate the presence of interlaminate cabling.


Author(s):  
Cristiana Delprete ◽  
Raffaella Sesana

The paper presents and discusses a low-cycle fatigue life prediction energy-based model. The model was applied to a commercial cast iron automotive exhaust manifold. The total expended energy until fracture proposed by the Skelton model was modified by means of two coefficients which take into account of the effects of mean stress and/or mean strain, and the presence of high temperature. The model was calibrated by means of experimental tests developed on Fe–2.4C–4.6Si–0.7Mo–1.2Cr high-temperature-resistant ductile cast iron. The thermostructural transient analysis was developed on a finite element model built to overtake confidentiality industrial restrictions. In addition to the commercial exhaust manifold, the finite element model considers the bolts, the gasket, and a cylinder head simulacrum to consider the corresponding thermal and mechanical boundary conditions. The life assessment performance of the energy-based model with respect the cast iron specimens was compared with the corresponding Basquin–Manson–Coffin and Skelton models. The model prediction fits the experimental data with a good agreement, which is comparable with both the literature models and it shows a better fitting at high temperature. The life estimations computed with respect the exhaust manifold finite element model were compared with different multiaxial literature life models and literature data to evaluate the life prediction capability of the proposed energy-based model.


2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P. Halloran ◽  
Chadd W. Clary ◽  
Lorin P. Maletsky ◽  
Mark Taylor ◽  
Anthony J. Petrella ◽  
...  

Evaluating total knee replacement kinematics and contact pressure distributions is an important element of preclinical assessment of implant designs. Although physical testing is essential in the evaluation process, validated computational models can augment these experiments and efficiently evaluate perturbations of the design or surgical variables. The objective of the present study was to perform an initial kinematic verification of a dynamic finite element model of the Kansas knee simulator by comparing predicted tibio- and patellofemoral kinematics with experimental measurements during force-controlled gait simulation. A current semiconstrained, cruciate-retaining, fixed-bearing implant mounted in aluminum fixtures was utilized. An explicit finite element model of the simulator was developed from measured physical properties of the machine, and loading conditions were created from the measured experimental feedback data. The explicit finite element model allows both rigid body and fully deformable solutions to be chosen based on the application of interest. Six degrees-of-freedom kinematics were compared for both tibio- and patellofemoral joints during gait loading, with an average root mean square (rms) translational error of 1.1 mm and rotational rms error of 1.3 deg. Model sensitivity to interface friction and damping present in the experimental joints was also evaluated and served as a secondary goal of this paper. Modifying the metal-polyethylene coefficient of friction from 0.1 to 0.01 varied the patellar flexion-extension and tibiofemoral anterior-posterior predictions by 7 deg and 2 mm, respectively, while other kinematic outputs were largely insensitive.


2020 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 106362
Author(s):  
Timo J. Hakala ◽  
Anssi Laukkanen ◽  
Tomi Suhonen ◽  
Kenneth Holmberg

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 635-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep L. Menezes ◽  
Michael R. Lovell ◽  
Ilya V. Avdeev ◽  
Jeen-Shang Lin ◽  
C. Fred Higgs

Author(s):  
Budy Notohardjono ◽  
Richard Ecker ◽  
Shawn Canfield

A mainframe computer’s structure consists of a frame or rack, drawers with central processor units, IO equipment, memory and other electronic equipment. The focus of this structural mechanical analysis and design is on the frame, earthquake stiffening brackets and tie-down methods. The primary function of the frame is to protect critical electronic equipment in two modes. The first mode is during shipping shock and vibration, which provides excitation primarily in the vertical direction. The second mode of protection is protecting the equipment during seismic events where horizontal vibration can be significant. Frame stiffening brackets and tie-downs are features added to mainframe systems that must meet earthquake resistance requirements. Designing to withstand seismic events requires significant analysis and test efforts since the functional performance of the system must be maintained during and after seismic events. The frame stiffening brackets and anchorage system must have adequate strength and stiffness to counteract earthquake-induced forces, thereby preventing human injury and potential system damage. The frame’s stiffening bracket and tie-down combination must ensure continued system operation by limiting overall displacement of the structure to acceptable levels, while not inducing undue stress to the critical electronic components. This paper discusses the process of finite element analysis and testing of a mainframe computer structure to develop a design that can withstand a severe earthquake test profile. Finite element analysis modeling tools such as ANSYS, a general-purpose finite element solver, was used to analyze the initial frame design CAD model. Both implicit and explicit finite element methods were used to analyze the mainframe subjected to uniaxial and triaxial earthquake test profiles. The seismic simulation tests involve extensive uniaxial and triaxial earthquake testing in both raised floor and non-raised floor environments at a test facility. Prior to this extensive final test, in-house tests were conducted along with modal analysis of the prototype frame hardware. These tests are used to refine the dynamic characteristics of the finite element model and to design the frame stiffening bracket and tie-down system. The purpose of the modeling and in-house testing is to have a verified finite element model of the server frame and components, which will then lead to successful, seismic system tests. During experimental verification, the dynamic responses were recorded and analyzed in both the time and frequency domains. The use of explicit finite element modeling, specifically LS-DYNA, extends the capability of implicit, linear modeling by allowing the incorporation of test data time history input and the experimentally derived damping ratio. When combined with the ability to model non-linear connections and material properties, this method provides better correlation to measured test results. In practice, the triaxial seismic time history was applied as input to the finite element model, which predicted regions of plastic strain and deformation. These results were used to iteratively simulate enhancements and successfully reduce structural failure in subsequent testing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document