scholarly journals Search of QCD phase transition points in the canonical approach of the NJL model

2019 ◽  
Vol 795 ◽  
pp. 548-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Wakayama ◽  
Atsushi Hosaka
2014 ◽  
Vol 925 ◽  
pp. 14-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Herold ◽  
Marlene Nahrgang ◽  
Igor Mishustin ◽  
Marcus Bleicher

2013 ◽  
Vol 904-905 ◽  
pp. 899c-902c ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Nahrgang ◽  
Christoph Herold ◽  
Marcus Bleicher

1996 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Iwasaki ◽  
K. Kanaya ◽  
S. Kaya ◽  
S. Sakai ◽  
T. Yoshié

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 051101
Author(s):  
Songju Lei ◽  
Dong Bai ◽  
Zhongzhou Ren ◽  
Mengjiao Lyu

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950003
Author(s):  
Yu-Qiang Cui ◽  
Zhong-Liang Pan

We investigate the finite-temperature and zero quark chemical potential QCD chiral phase transition of strongly interacting matter within the two-flavor Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model as well as the proper time regularization. We use two different regularization processes, as discussed in Refs. 36 and 37, separately, to discuss how the effective mass M varies with the temperature T. Based on the calculation, we find that the M of both regularization schemes decreases when T increases. However, for three different parameter sets, quite different behaviors will show up. The results obtained by the method in Ref. 36 are very close to each other, but those in Ref. 37 are getting farther and farther from each other. This means that although the method in Ref. 37 seems physically more reasonable, it loses the advantage in Ref. 36 of a small parameter dependence. In addition, we also, find that two regularization schemes provide similar results when T [Formula: see text] 100 MeV, while when T is larger than 100 MeV, the difference becomes obvious: the M calculated by the method in Ref. 36 decreases more rapidly than that in Ref. 37.


2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-670
Author(s):  
Meng Xiang-Fei ◽  
Chen Ying ◽  
Liu Yu-Bin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document