scholarly journals A “general boundary” formulation for quantum mechanics and quantum gravity

2003 ◽  
Vol 575 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Oeckl
2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 1200-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELENA MAGLIARO ◽  
CLAUDIO PERINI

We illustrate the conceptual scenario of the general boundary formulation for field theories and present a brief description of the calculus of graviton propagator in the context of LQG. Then we analyze the possibility of comparing this result with the graviton propagator in perturbative quantum gravity. For this purpose we demonstrate the compatibility of harmonic and radial gauge; it allows to simultaneously impose both gauges and to obtain an expression for the propagator comparable with the one provided by LQG.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Colosi ◽  
Luis Arturo Ureña-López ◽  
Hugo Aurelio Morales-Técotl ◽  
Román Linares-Romero ◽  
Elí Santos-Rodríguez ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1031-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhay Ashtekar ◽  
Stephen Fairhurst ◽  
Joshua L Willis

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1850169
Author(s):  
M. Mardaani ◽  
K. Nozari

Polymer quantum mechanics, as a non-standard representation of quantum mechanics, is based on a symmetric sector of loop quantum gravity known as loop quantum cosmology. In this work, by analyzing the Hamiltonian and Friedmann equations in the standard Hilbert space and polymer Hilbert space, we show that polymer quantization is a successful formalism for a non-Abelian gauge field driving the cosmological inflation, the so-called gauge-flation, in order to remove initial singularity and also keeping the inflationary trajectories in this model as attractors of dynamics after the bounce.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (21) ◽  
pp. 2050114
Author(s):  
M. Bauer ◽  
C. A. Aguillón ◽  
G. E. García

The problem of time in the quantization of gravity arises from the fact that time in Schrödinger’s equation is a parameter. This sets time apart from the spatial coordinates, represented by operators in quantum mechanics (QM). Thus “time” in QM and “time” in general relativity (GR) are seen as mutually incompatible notions. The introduction of a dynamical time operator in relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM), that follows from the canonical quantization of special relativity and that in the Heisenberg picture is also a function of the parameter [Formula: see text] (identified as the laboratory time), prompts to examine whether it can help to solve the disfunction referred to above. In particular, its application to the conditional interpretation of time in the canonical quantization approach to quantum gravity is developed.


KronoScope ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Martinetti

Abstract We discuss the emergence of time in quantum gravity and ask whether time is always “something that flows.” We first recall that this is indeed the case in both relativity and quantum mechanics, although in very different manners: time flows geometrically in relativity (i.e., as a flow of proper time in the four dimensional space-time), time flows abstractly in quantum mechanics (i.e., as a flow in the space of observables of the system). We then ask the same question in quantum gravity in the light of the thermal time hypothesis of Connes and Rovelli. The latter proposes to answer the question of time in quantum gravity (or at least one of its many aspects) by postulating that time is a state-dependent notion. This means that one is able to make a notion of time as an abstract flow—that we call the thermal time—emerge from the knowledge of both: the algebra of observables of the physical system under investigation; a state of thermal equilibrium of this system. Formally, the thermal time is similar to the abstract flow of time in quantum mechanics, but we show in various examples that it may have a concrete implementation either as a geometrical flow or as a geometrical flow combined with a non-geometric action. This indicates that in quantum gravity, time may well still be “something that flows” at some abstract algebraic level, but this does not necessarily imply that time is always and only “something that flows” at the geometric level.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (21) ◽  
pp. 3679-3696
Author(s):  
YU-LEI FENG ◽  
LI-XIN XU ◽  
YU-TING WANG

In this paper, we try to give an alternative interpretation of the holography principle. We argue that the space or time may be regarded as emerging from quantum mechanics as an evolutive parameter. The lower D-dimensional theory is related to a corresponding (D+1)-theory by a mysterious quantum system. Then from the higher-dimensional theory, under a new dimension reduction mechanism we obtain the corresponding results. We also try to incorporate the gauge field into the reduction, roughly identifying Aμ with Nμ which is the shift vector in the ADM-like decomposition of space–time metric. In the end, we extend to the gravitational field, and obtain a relation [Formula: see text] with a cutoff factor κ, from a different view.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 1319-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
GIOVANNI AMELINO-CAMELIA

Quantum mechanics is revisited as the appropriate theoretical framework for the description of the outcome of experiments that rely on the use of classical devices. In particular, it is emphasized that the limitations on the measurability of (pairs of conjugate) observables encoded in the formalism of quantum mechanics reproduce faithfully the "classical-device limit" of the corresponding limitations encountered in (real or gedanken) experimental setups. It is then argued that devices cannot behave classically in quantum gravity, and that this might raise serious problems for the search of a class of experiments described by theories obtained by "applying quantum mechanics to gravity." It is also observed that using heuristic/intuitive arguments based on the absence of classical devices one is led to consider some candidate quantum gravity phenomena involving dimensionful deformations of the Poincaré symmetries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document