Displaced logarithmic profile of the velocity distribution in the boundary layer of a turbulent flow over an unbounded flat surface

2015 ◽  
Vol 379 (47-48) ◽  
pp. 3102-3107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Talpos ◽  
Marian Apostol
2021 ◽  
Vol 920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel R. Bristow ◽  
Gianluca Blois ◽  
James L. Best ◽  
Kenneth T. Christensen

Abstract


1992 ◽  
Vol 18 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 21-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.J. You ◽  
D.L. Wilkinson ◽  
P. Nielsen

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Kithcart ◽  
David E. Klett

Abstract Turbulent boundary layer flow over a flat surface with a single dimple has been investigated numerically using the FLUENT CFD software package, and compared to an experiment by Ezerskii and Shekhov [1989], which studied the same configuration. The impetus for this work developed as a result of previous studies. Kithcart and Klett [1996], and Afanas’yev and Chudnovskiy [1992], showed that dimpled surfaces enhance heat transfer comparably to surfaces with protrusion roughness elements, but with a much lower drag penalty. However, the actual physical mechanisms involved in this phenomena were only partially known prior this study. Results obtained numerically are in good agreement with the experiment, most notably the confirmation of the existence of a region of enhanced heat transfer created by interaction of the flow with the dimple. In particular, the simulation indicates that heat transfer augmentation is a consequence of the development of a stagnation flow region within the dimple geometry, and the existence of coherent vortical structures which create a periodic flow-field within and immediately downstream of the dimple. This periodicity appears to govern the magnitude of the heat transfer augmentation.


Author(s):  
R. E. Mayle ◽  
K. Dullenkopf

A theory for transition from laminar to turbulent flow as the result of unsteady, periodic passing of turbulent wakes in the free stream is developed using Emmons’ transition model. Comparisons made to flat plate boundary layer measurements and airfoil heat transfer measurements confirm the theory.


It is not possible to distinguish between the Momentum Transport and the Vorticity Transport theories of turbulent flow by measurements of the distribution of velocity in a fluid flowing under pressure through pipes or between parallel planes. Only simultaneous measurements of temperature and velocity distribution are capable of distinguishing between the two theories in these cases. On the other hand, it will be seen later that measurements of the distribution of velocity between concentric rotating cylinders are capable of distinguishing between the two theories; in fact the predictions of the two theories in this case are sharply contrasted and mutually exclusive.


Fluids ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Ming Teng ◽  
Ugo Piomelli

The development of secondary instabilities in a boundary layer over a backward-facing step is investigated numerically. Two step heights are considered, h/δo*=0.5 and 1.0 (where δo* is the displacement thickness at the step location), in addition to a reference flat-plate case. A case with a realistic freestream-velocity distribution is also examined. A controlled K-type transition is initiated using a narrow ribbon upstream of the step, which generates small and monochromatic perturbations by periodic blowing and suction. A well-resolved direct numerical simulation is performed. The step height and the imposed freestream-velocity distribution exert a significant influence on the transition process. The results for the h/δo*=1.0 case exhibit a rapid transition primarily due to the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability downstream of step; non-linear interactions already occur within the recirculation region, and the initial symmetry and periodicity of the flow are lost by the middle stage of transition. In contrast, case h/δo*=0.5 presents a transition road map in which transition occurs far downstream of the step, and the flow remains spatially symmetric and temporally periodic until the late stage of transition. A realistic freestream-velocity distribution (which induces an adverse pressure gradient) advances the onset of transition to turbulence, but does not fundamentally modify the flow features observed in the zero-pressure gradient case. Considering the budgets of the perturbation kinetic energy, both the step and the induced pressure-gradient increase, rather than modify, the energy transfer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document