Formation energies and swelling of uranium dioxide by point defects

2012 ◽  
Vol 376 (17) ◽  
pp. 1499-1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Ma ◽  
Asok K. Ray
1990 ◽  
Vol 216 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Berding ◽  
A. Sher ◽  
A.-B. Chen

ABSTRACTNative point defects play an important role in HgCdTe. Here we discuss some of the relevant mass action equations, and use recently calculated defect formation energies to discuss relative defect concentrations. In agreement with experiment, the Hg vacancy is found to be the dominant native defect to accommodate excess tellurium. Preliminary estimates find the Hg antisite and the Hg interstitial to be of comparable densities. Our calculated defect formation energies are also consistent with measured diffusion activation energies, assuming the interstitial and vacancy migration energies are small.


2009 ◽  
Vol 384 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj Nerikar ◽  
Taku Watanabe ◽  
James S. Tulenko ◽  
Simon R. Phillpot ◽  
Susan B. Sinnott

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ramprasad ◽  
H. Zhu ◽  
Patrick Rinke ◽  
Matthias Scheffler

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (06) ◽  
pp. 795-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
HATICE KÖKTEN ◽  
ŞAKIR ERKOÇ

The surface structure, surface energy, and surface vacancy formation energy for B and N vacancy of the cubic boron nitride (c-BN)(110) surface have been investigated by performing Hartree-Fock and DFT calculations. Results are compared with available literature values. The vacancy formation energies [unrelaxed [Formula: see text] and relaxed (Ef)] are reported for the first time for c-BN(110).


2020 ◽  
Vol 325 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-262
Author(s):  
Mikhail V. Ryzhkov ◽  
Maxim A. Kovalenko ◽  
Anatolii Ya Kupryazhkin ◽  
Sanjeev K. Gupta

1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-134
Author(s):  
Upendra Puntambekar ◽  
Sunder Veliah ◽  
Ravindra Pandey

The results of a study of point defects in MgS are presented. First we obtain empirical interionic potentials in the framework of a shell model and then calculate defect energies using the HADES and ICECAP simulation procedures. The calculated Schottky formation energy is 10.9 eV in comparison to the cation and anion Frenkel formation energies of 11.9 and 25.1 eV, respectively. The migration energy by the vacancy mechanism of the Mg2+ and S2− ions is predicted to be 2.5 and 3.4 eV, respectively. One-electron ICECAP calculations yield the optical absorption energy of 3.1 eV for the F+ center in MgS.


2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 2651-2657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Misako Iwasawa ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Yasunori Kaneta ◽  
Toshiharu Ohnuma ◽  
Hua-Yun Geng ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 31-32 ◽  
pp. 163-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.A. Runciman ◽  
B. Srinivasan ◽  
D.D. Richardson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document