Delayed knee flexion is a safe and effective pathway for Total Knee Replacement

Physiotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Cathy Jenkins ◽  
William Jackson ◽  
Nicholas Bottomley ◽  
Andrew Price ◽  
David Murray ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Ashworth ◽  
Christian N. Warner ◽  
Saurabh P Mehta ◽  
Franklin D. Shuler ◽  
Ali Oliashirazi

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus A. Wimmer ◽  
William Nechtow ◽  
Thorsten Schwenke ◽  
Kirsten C. Moisio

Walking is only one of many daily activities performed by patients following total knee replacement (TKR). The purpose of this study was to examine the hypotheses (a) that subject activity characteristics are correlated with knee flexion range of motion (ROM) and (b) that there is a significant difference between the subject’s flexion/extension excursion throughout the day and the ISO specified input for knee wear testing. In order to characterize activity, the number of walking and stair stepping cycles, the time spent with dynamic and stationary activities, the number of activity sequences, and the knee flexion/extension excursion of 32 TKR subjects were collected during daily activity. Flexion/extension profiles were compared with the ISO 14243 simulator input profile using a level crossing classification algorithm. Subjects took an average of 3102 (range: 343–5857) walking cycles including 65 (range: 0–319) stair stepping cycles. Active and passive ROMs were positively correlated with stair walking time, stair step counts, and stair walking sequences. Simulated knee motion according to ISO showed significantly fewer level crossings at the flexion angles 20–40° and beyond 50° than those measured with the monitor. This suggests that implant wear testing protocols should contain more cycles and a variety of activities requiring higher knee flexion angles with incorporated resting/transition periods to account for the many activity sequences.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1112-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Onodera ◽  
Tokifumi Majima ◽  
Osamu Nishiike ◽  
Yasuhiko Kasahara ◽  
Daisuke Takahashi

2014 ◽  
Vol 96-B (2) ◽  
pp. 201-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Napier ◽  
D. Bennett ◽  
J. McConway ◽  
R. Wilson ◽  
A. M. Sykes ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S170-S171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marietta van der Linden ◽  
Philip Rowe ◽  
Paul Gaston ◽  
Fraser Wade ◽  
Richard Nutton

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Hast ◽  
Stephen J. Piazza

Model-based estimation of in vivo contact forces arising between components of a total knee replacement is challenging because such forces depend upon accurate modeling of muscles, tendons, ligaments, contact, and multibody dynamics. Here we describe an approach to solving this problem with results that are tested by comparison to knee loads measured in vivo for a single subject and made available through the Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in vivo Tibiofemoral Loads. The approach makes use of a “dual-joint” paradigm in which the knee joint is alternately represented by (1) a ball-joint knee for inverse dynamic computation of required muscle controls and (2) a 12 degree-of-freedom (DOF) knee with elastic foundation contact at the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral articulations for forward dynamic integration. Measured external forces and kinematics were applied as a feedback controller and static optimization attempted to track measured knee flexion angles and electromyographic (EMG) activity. The resulting simulations showed excellent tracking of knee flexion (average RMS error of 2.53 deg) and EMG (muscle activations within ±10% envelopes of normalized measured EMG signals). Simulated tibiofemoral contact forces agreed qualitatively with measured contact forces, but their RMS errors were approximately 25% of the peak measured values. These results demonstrate the potential of a dual-joint modeling approach to predict joint contact forces from kinesiological data measured in the motion laboratory. It is anticipated that errors in the estimation of contact force will be reduced as more accurate subject-specific models of muscles and other soft tissues are developed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patti Kastanias ◽  
Sue Gowans ◽  
Paul S Tumber ◽  
Kianda Snaith ◽  
Sandra Robinson

PURPOSE: To investigate whether patient-controlled oral analgesia (PCOA) used by individuals receiving a total knee replacement could reduce pain, increase patient satisfaction, reduce opioid use and/or reduce opioid side effects when compared with traditional nurse (RN)-administered oral analgesia.METHODS: Patients who underwent an elective total knee replacement at a quaternary care centre (Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario) were randomly assigned to either PCOA or RN-administered short-acting oral opioids on postoperative day 2. Subjects in the RN group called the RN to receive their prescribed short-acting opioid. Subjects in the PCOA group kept a single dose of their prescribed oral opioid at their bedside and took this dose when they felt they needed it, to a maximum of one dose every 2 h. Study outcomes, collected on postoperative day 2, included pain (measured by the Brief Pain Inventory – Short Form), patient satisfaction (measured by the Pain Outcome Questionnaire Satisfaction sub-scale – component II), opioid use (oral morphine equivalents), opioid side effects (nausea, pruritis and/or constipation) and knee measures (maximum passive knee flexion and pain at maximum passive knee flexion, performed on the operative knee).RESULTS: Study outcomes were analyzed twice. First, for a subset of 73 subjects who remained in their randomly assigned group (PCOA group, n=36; RN group, n=37), randomized analyses were performed. Second, for the larger sample of 88 subjects who were categorized by their actual method of receiving oral opioids (PCOA group, n=41; RN group, n=47), as-treated analyses were performed. There were no differences in study outcomes between the PCOA and RN groups in either analysis.CONCLUSION: PCOA was not superior to RN administration on study outcomes. However, PCOA did not increase opioid use or pain. PCOA remains an important element in the patient-centred care facility.


Physiotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. e58-e59
Author(s):  
C. Jenkins ◽  
W. Jackson ◽  
N. Bottomley ◽  
A. Price ◽  
D. Murray ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document