Do therapist effects determine outcome in patients with shoulder pain in a primary care physiotherapy setting?

Physiotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 111-117
Author(s):  
Margit K. Kooijman ◽  
Elisah M. Buining ◽  
Ilse C.S. Swinkels ◽  
Bart W. Koes ◽  
Cindy Veenhof
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Therapist Effects

Physiotherapy for patients with shoulder pain in primary care: a descriptive study of diagnostic- and therapeutic management

Physiotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.H.J.M. Karel ◽  
G.G.M. Scholten-Peeters ◽  
M. Thoomes-de Graaf ◽  
E. Duijn ◽  
J.B. van Broekhoven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Therapeutic Management

scholarly journals Corticosteroid injection for shoulder pain: single-blind randomized pilot trial in primary care

Trials ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim A Holt ◽  
David Mant ◽  
Andrew Carr ◽  
Stephen Gwilym ◽  
David Beard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Single Blind

scholarly journals Consensus for a primary care clinical decision-making tool for assessing, diagnosing, and managing shoulder pain in Alberta, Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Breda H. F. Eubank ◽  
Sebastian W. Lackey ◽  
Mel Slomp ◽  
Jason R. Werle ◽  
Colleen Kuntze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Joint Health ◽  
Decision Making Tool

Abstract Background Shoulder pain is a highly prevalent condition and a significant cause of morbidity and functional disability. Current data suggests that many patients presenting with shoulder pain at the primary care level are not receiving high quality care. Primary care decision-making is complex and has the potential to influence the quality of care provided and patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical decision-making tool that standardizes care and minimizes uncertainty in assessment, diagnosis, and management. Methods First a rapid review was conducted to identify existing tools and evidence that could support a comprehensive clinical decision-making tool for shoulder pain. Secondly, provincial consensus was established for the assessment, diagnosis, and management of patients presenting to primary care with shoulder pain in Alberta, Canada using a three-step modified Delphi approach. This project was a highly collaborative effort between Alberta Health Services’ Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network (BJH SCN) and the Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI). Results A clinical decision-making tool for shoulder pain was developed and reached consensus by a province-wide expert panel representing various health disciplines and geographical regions. This tool consists of a clinical examination algorithm for assessing, diagnosis, and managing shoulder pain; recommendations for history-taking and identification of red flags or additional concerns; recommendations for physical examination and neurological screening; recommendations for the differential diagnosis; and care pathways for managing patients presenting with rotator cuff disease, biceps pathology, superior labral tear, adhesive capsulitis, osteoarthritis, and instability. Conclusions This clinical decision-making tool will help to standardize care, provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of shoulder pain, and assist in clinical decision-making for primary care providers in both public and private sectors.

scholarly journals Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: the PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e052758
Author(s):  
Gwenllian Wynne-Jones ◽  
Helen Myers ◽  
Alison Hall ◽  
Chris Littlewood ◽  
S Hennings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Clinical Cohort ◽  
Costs Of Care

IntroductionPeople presenting with shoulder pain considered to be of musculoskeletal origin is common in primary care but diagnosing the cause of the pain is contentious, leading to uncertainty in management. To inform optimal primary care for patients with shoulder pain, the study aims to (1) to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes (overall prognosis) of shoulder pain, (2) estimate costs of care, (3) develop a prognostic model for predicting individuals’ level and risk of pain and disability at 6 months and (4) investigate experiences and opinions of patients and healthcare professionals regarding diagnosis, prognosis and management of shoulder pain.Methods and analysisThe Prognostic And Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder (PANDA-S) study is a longitudinal clinical cohort with linked qualitative study. At least 400 people presenting to general practice and physiotherapy services in the UK will be recruited. Participants will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Short-term data will be collected weekly between baseline and 12 weeks via Short Message Serevice (SMS) text or software application. Participants will be offered clinical (physiotherapist) and ultrasound (sonographer) assessments at baseline. Qualitative interviews with ≈15 dyads of patients and their healthcare professional (general practitioner or physiotherapist).Short-term and long-term trajectories of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (using SPADI) will be described, using latent class growth analysis. Health economic analysis will estimate direct costs of care and indirect costs related to work absence and productivity losses. Multivariable regression analysis will be used to develop a prognostic model predicting future levels of pain and disability at 6 months using penalisation methods to adjust for overfitting. The added predictive value of prespecified physical examination tests and ultrasound findings will be examined. For the qualitative interviews an inductive, exploratory framework will be adopted using thematic analysis to investigate decision making, perspectives of patients and clinicians on the importance of diagnostic and prognostic information when negotiating treatment and referral options.Ethics and disseminationThe PANDA-S study has ethical approval from Yorkshire and The Humber-Sheffield Research Ethics Committee, UK (18/YH/0346, IRAS Number: 242750). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, social and mainstream media, professional conferences, and the patient and public involvement and engagement group supporting this study, and through newsletters, leaflets and posters in participating sites.Trial registration numberISRCTN46948079.

scholarly journals P144 Validation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) in patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary care

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian C Scott ◽  
Gareth McCray ◽  
Gillian Lancaster ◽  
Nadine E Foster ◽  
Jonathan C Hill
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Global Change ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Health Questionnaire ◽  
Musculoskeletal Health ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Pain Site ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) is a recently developed generic patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), evaluating impacts of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions on patients’ health. Its scores range 0-56; higher scores indicate better health. Its performance (a) in patients with MSK-pain in primary care, and (b) compared to MSK pain-site reference PROMs, is uncertain. We addressed these uncertainties through secondary analysis of a previous primary-care based study, enrolling 524 patients with shoulder, neck, lower back, knee, or multi-site MSK pain managed by GPs, from 8 West Midlands practices. Methods The study captured the following self-report questionnaire data at 0 and 6 months: MSK-HQ, EQ-5D-5L, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (back pain), Neck Disability Index (neck pain), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (shoulder pain), Knee Injury and Outcome Score (knee pain), Short-Form-12 (multisite pain). At 6 months, patients self-rated their global change in MSK pain, from -5 (“very much worse”) to + 5 (“completely recovered”). Receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated the ability of 6-month changes in each PROM to discriminate between patients improving/not improving on global change scores. Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) were calculated (cut-off optimising discriminatory sensitivity/specificity). Results Most (60%) reported pain improvements, with mean baseline MSK-HQ scores rising from 29.4 to 37.4 over 6-months. The MSK-HQ had a moderate ability to discriminate between patients improving vs. no change/worsening in MSK pain (area under the curve [AUC] 0.81; 95% CI 0.78-0.85). Its discriminative ability was better than the EQ-5D-3L (AUC 0.68; 95% CI 0.62-0.73) and at least as good as site-specific PROMs (Table). MCID for the 6-month change in MSK-HQ was 5.5 across all patients. Minor variation (<2.0 units) was observed in MSK-HQ MCID across 4/5 pain sites. The MSK-HQ had strong correlations with all PROMs except SF-12 physical/mental component summary scores. Conclusion In patients consulting in primary care with MSK pain, the MSK-HQ appears at least as good as existing pain-site specific PROMs at identifying patients self-reporting pain improvements, and superior to the EQ-5D-5L. Our results support the use of the MSK-HQ in this setting. Disclosures I.C. Scott None. G. McCray None. G. Lancaster None. N.E. Foster None. J.C. Hill None.

Management of patients with shoulder pain in primary care

10.33540/362 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Margit Kirsten Kooijman
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Shoulder Pain

scholarly journals Costs of shoulder pain in primary care consulters: a prospective cohort study in The Netherlands

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ton Kuijpers ◽  
Maurits W van Tulder ◽  
Geert JMG van der Heijden ◽  
Lex M Bouter ◽  
Daniëlle AWM van der Windt
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document