Prognostic factors for outcome following acute lateral ankle ligament sprain: a systematic review

Physiotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. e44-e45
Author(s):  
J. Thompson ◽  
C. Byrne ◽  
M. Williams ◽  
D. Keene ◽  
M. Schlussel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Lateral Ankle ◽  
Ankle Ligament ◽  
Lateral Ankle Ligament ◽  
Ligament Sprain

scholarly journals Prognostic factors for recovery following acute lateral ankle ligament sprain: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Yewande Thompson ◽  
Christopher Byrne ◽  
Mark A. Williams ◽  
David J. Keene ◽  
Micheal Maia Schlussel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Lateral Ankle ◽  
Ankle Ligament ◽  
Lateral Ankle Ligament ◽  
Ligament Sprain

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Repair of Lateral Ankle Ligament for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0038
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Shimozono ◽  
Alexandra J Brown ◽  
Eoghan T Hurley ◽  
John G Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Ligament Repair ◽  
Lateral Ankle ◽  
Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability ◽  
Ankle Ligament ◽  
Lateral Ankle Instability ◽  
Lateral Ankle Ligament

Category: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Sports Introduction/Purpose: Open modified Broström-Gould procedure is generally accepted as the gold-standard treatment for chronic lateral ankle instability. Recently an arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair technique has become increasingly popular in an effort to reduce post-operative pain and facilitate early recovery. The purpose of the current systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence on arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair techniques and to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and open techniques for chronic lateral ankle instability with meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed during August 2017. Included studies were evaluated with regard to level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) using the Coleman Methodology Score. Variable reporting outcome data, clinical outcomes, and percentage of patients who returned to sport at previous level were also evaluated. Comparative studies were compared using RevMan version 5.3, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twelve studies for a total of 421 ankles were included; 92% of studies were LOE III or IV and the QOE in all studies was of poor or fair quality. There were three comparative studies of open and arthroscopic repair procedures, with two Level III studies and one Level I study. There was a significant difference in favor of arthroscopic repair at final follow-up for the Karlsson- Peterson score (MD; 2.59, 95%CI, -0.19 to 2.36, I2=0%, p=0.10) and the AOFAS score (MD; 1.50, 95%CI, 0.41 to 2.59, I2=0%, p=0.007) in the comparative studies. The overall complication rate was 13.4% in the included studies but in the comparative studies there was no statistically significant difference between open and arthroscopic repair (12.1% vs 11.4%, p=0.90). Conclusion: The current systematic review demonstrated that arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair may yield favorable clinical outcomes and may be superior to open procedure in the short-term, but there is no clinical evidence to support the advantages of the arthroscopic procedure over the open procedure in the mid- long-term follow-up. There was a relatively high complication rate associated with the arthroscopic procedures, with a 13.4% complication rate, although recent comparative studies demonstrated similar complication rates.

scholarly journals Early Versus Delayed Mobilization Postoperative Protocols for Lateral Ankle Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596712092525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Vopat ◽  
Armin Tarakemeh ◽  
Brandon Morris ◽  
Maaz Hassan ◽  
Pat Garvin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Ligament Repair ◽  
Lateral Ankle ◽  
Anterior Drawer ◽  
Ankle Ligament ◽  
Lateral Ankle Ligament ◽  
Talar Tilt ◽  
Primary Lateral

Background: The majority of patients with an acute lateral ankle ligamentous injury are successfully treated nonoperatively with functional rehabilitation; however, a small proportion of these patients experience persistent chronic instability and may require surgical intervention. Delayed primary repair of the ruptured ligaments is most commonly indicated for these patients. Optimal rehabilitation after lateral ankle ligament repair remains unknown, as surgeons vary in how they balance protection of the surgical repair site with immobilization against the need for ankle joint mobilization to restore optimal postoperative ankle range of motion. Purpose: To compare early and delayed mobilization (EM and DM, respectively) postoperative protocols in patients undergoing primary lateral ankle ligament repair to determine optimal evidence-based rehabilitation recommendations. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a meta-analysis using the PubMed/Ovid MEDLINE database was performed (October 11, 1947 to October 16, 2017), searching for articles involving lateral ankle ligament repair. Postoperative protocols were reviewed and divided into 2 categories: EM (within 3 weeks of surgery) and DM (more than 3 weeks post surgery). Return to sport (RTS), outcome scores (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [AOFAS] ankle-hindfoot scale and Karlsson score), radiographic outcomes (talar tilt and anterior drawer), and complications of both populations were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 28 of 1574 studies met the criteria for the final analysis, comprising 1457 patients undergoing primary lateral ankle ligament repair. The postoperative AOFAS score was significantly greater in the EM versus DM group (98.8 vs 91.9, respectively; P < .001), as was the postoperative Karlsson score (92.2 vs 90.0, respectively; P < .001). However, the EM group had significantly greater postoperative laxity on both the anterior drawer test (6.3 vs 3.9 mm, respectively; P < .001) and talar tilt test (5.1° vs 4.5°, respectively; P < .001). Also, the DM group had significantly lower rates of overall complications (3.1% vs 11.4%, respectively; P < .001) and skin wound complications (1.3% vs 3.8%, respectively; P = .005). RTS was not significantly different between groups ( P = .100). Conclusion: Patients with EM postoperative protocols demonstrated improved functional outcomes; however, the EM group had increased objective laxity and a higher complication rate. Additional randomized studies are needed to definitively evaluate early versus delayed rehabilitation protocol timetables to optimize functional outcomes without compromising long-term stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document