scholarly journals Does treatment by a specialist physiotherapist change pain and function in young adults with symptoms from femoroacetabular impingement? A pilot project for a randomised controlled trial

Physiotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Smeatham ◽  
Roy Powell ◽  
Sarah Moore ◽  
Rohan Chauhan ◽  
Matthew Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
And Function

Capsular closure versus unrepaired interportal capsulotomy after hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement, results of a patient-blinded randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110057
Author(s):  
Niels H Bech ◽  
Inger N Sierevelt ◽  
Sheryl de Waard ◽  
Boudijn S H Joling ◽  
Gino M M J Kerkhoffs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Hip capsular management after hip arthroscopy remains a topic of debate. Most available current literature is of poor quality and are retrospective or cohort studies. As of today, no clear consensus exists on capsular management after hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of routine capsular closure versus unrepaired capsulotomy after interportal capsulotomy measured with NRS pain and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). Materials and methods: All eligible patients with femoroacetabular impingement who opt for hip arthroscopy ( n = 116) were randomly assigned to one of both treatment groups and were operated by a single surgeon. Postoperative pain was measured with the NRS score weekly the first 12 weeks after surgery. The HAGOS questionnaire was measured at 12 and 52 weeks postoperatively. Results: Baseline characteristics and operation details were comparable between treatment groups. Regarding the NRS pain no significant difference was found between groups at any point the first 12 weeks after surgery ( p = 0.67). Both groups significantly improved after surgery ( p < 0.001). After 3 months follow-up there were no differences between groups for the HAGOS questionnaire except for the domain sport ( p = 0.02) in favour of the control group. After 12 months follow-up there were no differences between both treatment groups on all HAGOS domains ( p  > 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this randomised controlled trial show highest possible evidence that there is no reason for routinely capsular closure after interportal capsulotomy at the end of hip arthroscopy. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at the CCMO Dutch Trial Register: NL55669.048.15.

scholarly journals Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial investigating two different refeeding formulations to improve safety and efficacy of hospital management of adolescent and young adults admitted with anorexia nervosa

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e038242
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Parker ◽  
Victoria Flood ◽  
Mark Halaki ◽  
Christine Wearne ◽  
Gail Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Enteral Feeding ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Adolescent And Young Adults ◽  
Enteral Formula ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionProviding effective nutritional rehabilitation to patients hospitalised with anorexia nervosa (AN) is challenging, partly due to conservative recommendations that advocate feeding patients at low energy intakes. An ‘underfeeding syndrome’ can develop when patients are not provided with adequate nutrition during treatment, whereby malnourished patients fail to restore weight in a timely matter, and even lose weight. Of particular concern, the reintroduction of carbohydrate in a starved patient can increase the risk of developing electrolyte, metabolic and organ dysfunction. The proposed trial assesses the efficacy and safety of a lower carbohydrate enteral formula (28% carbohydrate) against a standard enteral formula (54% carbohydrate), in adolescent and young adult patients (aged 15–25 years), hospitalised with AN.Methods and analysisThe study employs a double-blind randomised controlled trial design. At admission to hospital, malnourished adolescent and young adults with AN will be randomly allocated to commence feeding on a standard enteral feeding formula (1.5 kcal/mL, 54% carbohydrate) or a lower carbohydrate isocaloric enteral feeding formula (1.5 kcal/mL, 28% carbohydrate). Assessments of nutritional intake, weight and biochemistry (phosphate, magnesium, potassium) will be conducted at baseline and during the first 3 weeks of hospital admission. The primary outcome measure will be incidence of hypophosphatemia. Secondary outcomes include weight gain, oedema, other electrolyte distortion, length of hospital admission, admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and number of days to reach medical stability, using defined parameters.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee and institutional research governance approvals were granted. Written informed consent will be sought prior to study enrolment. Study findings will be widely disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000342314); Pre-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document