Theta burst stimulation (TBS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) in post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Physiotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. e743-e744
Author(s):  
F. Khan
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fayaz Khan ◽  
Chaturbhuj Rathore ◽  
Mahesh Kate ◽  
Josy Joy ◽  
George Zachariah ◽  
...  

Objective: To study the long-term effectiveness of Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) or Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) combined with Physical therapy (PT) as compared to PT alone for improving arm functions in patients with acute stroke. Design: Single blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient clinics and inpatient wards at tertiary care neurology center. Subjects: Adult patients with acute middle cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke. Interventions: 60 patients were randomized into three groups of 20 each: TBS+PT; FES+PT; and PT alone. TBS group received intermittent TBS of ipsilesional hemisphere and continuous TBS of contralesional hemisphere while FES group received FES of paretic limb, both for four weeks. All groups received supervised physical therapy for four weeks followed by home physiotherapy for one year. Outcome measures: Fugl Meyer Assessment upper limb score (FMA-UL) was primary outcome measure. Patients were evaluated at baseline and subsequently at one, three and six months and one year. Results: Compared to PT group, mean FMA-UL scores were higher in TBS and FES groups at all follow-ups ( P < 0.001). From baseline to one year, mean (SD) FMA-UL scores increased from 14.9(2.1) to 55.55(2.46) in TBS group, 15.5(1.99) to 55.85(2.46) in FES group, and 14.3(2.2) to 43.3(4.22) in PT group indicating an increase of 273%, 260%, and 203% respectively. There was no difference between FES and TBS groups. Conclusion: A four-week intervention with TBS or FES combined with PT produces better long-term arm functions as compared to PT alone in patients with acute stroke.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Hsin Chen ◽  
Chia-Ling Chen ◽  
Ying-Zu Huang ◽  
Hsieh-Ching Chen ◽  
Chung-Yao Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Virtual reality and arm cycling have been reported as effective treatment to improve upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can increase ipsilesional cortical excitability, and has been increasingly used in patients with stroke. However, few studies examined the augmented effect of iTBS on neurorehabilitation program. In this study, we investigated the augmented effect of iTBS on virtual reality-based cycling training (VCT) for upper limb motor function in patients with stroke.Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 23 patients with stroke were recruited. Each patient received either 15 sessions of iTBS or sham stimulation in addition to VCT on the same day. Outcome measures were assessed before and after the intervention. Co-primary outcome measures for body function were Modified Ashworth Scale Upper Extremity (MAS-UE) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary outcome measures for activity and participation were Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Box and Block Test (BBT) and Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Paired t test was performed to evaluate the effectiveness after the intervention and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to compare the therapeutic effects between two groups.Results: At post-treatment, both groups showed significant improvement in FMA-UE and ARAT, while only the iTBS group demonstrated significant improvement in MAS-UE, BBT, NHPT, MAL and SIS. ANCOVA revealed that the iTBS group presented greater improvement than the sham group significantly in MAS-UE, NHPT and SIS. However, there were no significant differences in the changes of the FMA-UE, ARAT, BBT, and MAL between groups.Conclusions: Intermittent TBS showed augmented efficacy on VCT for reducing spasticity, improving manual dexterity, and increasing participation in daily life in stroke patients. This study provided an integrated innovative intervention, which may be a promising therapy to improve upper limb motor function recovery, especially manual dexterity, in stroke rehabilitation. However, this study has a small sample size, and thus a further larger-scale study is warranted to confirm the treatment efficacy.Trial registration: This trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov ID No. NCT03350087, retrospectively registered, on November 22, 2017.


2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. S78
Author(s):  
Daniel Blumberger ◽  
Fidel Vila-Rodriguez ◽  
Zafiris Daskalakis ◽  
Jonathan Downar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document