Caffeine dependence in rats: Effects of exposure duration and concentration

2008 ◽  
Vol 95 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 252-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel N. Dingle ◽  
Sarah E. Dreumont-Boudreau ◽  
Vincent M. LoLordo
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Pratarelli ◽  
Brita Radzymski ◽  
Eric Ayers ◽  
Erica Tryon ◽  
Aaron Randall
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1498-1502
Author(s):  
Yongwoog Andy Jeon ◽  
◽  
Yuhosua Ryoo ◽  
Kacy Kim ◽  
Sukki Yoon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah E. Aichelman ◽  
Colleen B. Bove ◽  
Karl D. Castillo ◽  
Jessica M. Boulton ◽  
Alyssa C. Knowlton ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B Merriman ◽  
Justin S Mora ◽  
Brent W Beaumont ◽  
Mervyn J Merrilees

1972 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Phillip Kleespies ◽  
Morton Wiener

This study explored (1) for evidence of visual input at so-called “subliminal” exposure durations, and (2) whether the response, if any, was a function of the thematic content of the stimulus. Thematic content (threatening versus non-threatening) and stimulus structure (angular versus curved) were varied independently under “subliminal,” “part-cue,” and “identification” exposure conditions. With Ss' reports and the frequency and latency of first eye movements (“orienting reflex”) as input indicators, there was no evidence of input differences which are a function of thematic content at any exposure duration, and the “report” data were consistent with the eye-movement data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document