Volatility aggregation intensity energy futures series on stochastic finite-range exclusion dynamics

2019 ◽  
Vol 514 ◽  
pp. 370-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linlu Jia ◽  
Jinchuan Ke ◽  
Jun Wang
2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Patterson ◽  
David Greene ◽  
Elyse Steiner ◽  
Steve Plotkin ◽  
Margaret Singh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Gonzalez-Boquera ◽  
M. Centelles ◽  
X. Viñas ◽  
L. M. Robledo
Keyword(s):  

Urban Studies ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 004209802110059
Author(s):  
Leslie Quitzow ◽  
Friederike Rohde

Current imaginaries of urban smart grid technologies are painting attractive pictures of the kinds of energy futures that are desirable and attainable in cities. Making claims about the future city, the socio-technical imaginaries related to smart grid developments unfold the power to guide urban energy policymaking and implementation practices. This paper analyses how urban smart grid futures are being imagined and co-produced in the city of Berlin, Germany. It explores these imaginaries to show how the politics of Berlin’s urban energy transition are being driven by techno-optimistic visions of the city’s digital modernisation and its ambitions to become a ‘smart city’. The analysis is based on a discourse analysis of relevant urban policy and other documents, as well as interviews with key stakeholders from Berlin’s energy, ICT and urban development sectors, including key experts from three urban laboratories for smart grid development and implementation in the city. It identifies three dominant imaginaries that depict urban smart grid technologies as (a) environmental solution, (b) economic imperative and (c) exciting experimental challenge. The paper concludes that dominant imaginaries of smart grid technologies in the city are grounded in a techno-optimistic approach to urban development that are foreclosing more subtle alternatives or perhaps more radical change towards low-carbon energy systems.


2019 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Rubner ◽  
Ashton J. Berry ◽  
Theodor Grofe ◽  
Marco Oetken

1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Baddeley ◽  
M. N. M. Van Lieshout ◽  
J. Møller

We show that a Poisson cluster point process is a nearest-neighbour Markov point process [2] if the clusters have uniformly bounded diameter. It is typically not a finite-range Markov point process in the sense of Ripley and Kelly [12]. Furthermore, when the parent Poisson process is replaced by a Markov or nearest-neighbour Markov point process, the resulting cluster process is also nearest-neighbour Markov, provided all clusters are non-empty. In particular, the nearest-neighbour Markov property is preserved when points of the process are independently randomly translated, but not when they are randomly thinned.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document