The potency of education programs for management of blood pressure through increasing self-efficacy of hypertensive patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaheh Foroumandi ◽  
Sorayya Kheirouri ◽  
Mohammad Alizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Hypertensive Patients

scholarly journals Comparative effects of different dietary approaches on blood pressure in hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (16) ◽  
pp. 2674-2687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Schwingshackl ◽  
Anna Chaimani ◽  
Carolina Schwedhelm ◽  
Estefania Toledo ◽  
Marina Pünsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hypertensive Patients

scholarly journals Device and non-device-guided slow breathing to reduce blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and a meta-analysis protocol (Preprint)

10.2196/33579 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamila Shelry Gonçalves ◽  
Ana Carolina Queiroz Godoy Daniel ◽  
José Luiz Tatagiba Lamas ◽  
Henrique Ceretta Oliveira ◽  
Renata Cristina De Campos Pereira Silveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reduce Blood Pressure ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Slow Breathing ◽  
Analysis Protocol

scholarly journals Nurse-Coordinated Blood Pressure Telemonitoring for Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
pp. 6892
Author(s):  
Woo-Seok Choi ◽  
Nam-Suk Kim ◽  
Ah-Young Kim ◽  
Hyung-Soo Woo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Home Blood Pressure ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Over Time

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has put hypertensive patients in densely populated cities at increased risk. Nurse-coordinated home blood pressure telemonitoring (NC-HBPT) may help address this. We screened studies published in English on three databases, from their inception to 30 November 2020. The effects of NC-HBPT were compared with in-person treatment. Outcomes included changes in blood pressure (BP) following the intervention and rate of BP target achievements before and during COVID-19. Of the 1916 articles identified, 27 comparisons were included in this review. In the intervention group, reductions of 5.731 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 4.120–7.341; p < 0.001) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 2.342 mmHg (1.482–3.202; p < 0.001) in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were identified. The rate of target BP achievement was significant in the intervention group (risk ratio, RR = 1.261, 1.154–1.378; p < 0.001). The effects of intervention over time showed an SBP reduction of 3.000 mmHg (−5.999–11.999) before 2000 and 8.755 mmHg (5.177–12.334) in 2020. DBP reduced by 2.000 mmHg (−2.724–6.724) before 2000 and by 3.529 mmHg (1.221–5.838) in 2020. Analysis of the target BP ratio before 2010 (RR = 1.101, 1.013–1.198) and in 2020 (RR = 1.906, 1.462–2.487) suggested improved BP control during the pandemic. NC-HBPT more significantly improves office blood pressure than UC among urban hypertensive patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document