scholarly journals Informed decision-making based on a leaflet in the context of prostate cancer screening

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 1483-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Dierks ◽  
Eveline A.M. Heijnsdijk ◽  
Ida J. Korfage ◽  
Monique J. Roobol ◽  
Harry J. de Koning
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making

scholarly journals African American Women’s Involvement in Promoting Informed Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Among Their Partners/Spouses

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 884-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer D. Allen ◽  
Ifedayo C. Akinyemi ◽  
Amanda Reich ◽  
Sasha Fleary ◽  
Shalini Tendulkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
African American ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
African American Men ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making ◽  
Care Providers

Routine prostate cancer screening is not recommended but African American men who are at higher risk for the disease should be offered the opportunity for shared decision-making with their health-care providers. This qualitative study sought to better understand the potential role of women in educating their male spouses/partners about prostate cancer screening. Nine focus groups were conducted ( n = 52). Women were recruited from a variety of community venues. Those eligible were African American and married to or in a partnership with an African American male age ≥ 45. Women provide numerous types of support to their male partners in an effort to facilitate participation in preventive health care. While women agreed that they would like to educate their partners about prostate cancer screening, they had little information about screening guidelines or the potential harms and limitations. The current findings suggest that women are eager information-seekers and can disseminate information to men and facilitate their efforts to make more informed decisions about prostate cancer screening. Women should be included in educational interventions for to promote informed decision-making for prostate cancer screening.

scholarly journals Prostate Cancer Screening in a Low-Literacy Population: Does Informed Decision Making Occur?

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 116-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Kripalani ◽  
Jyoti Sharma ◽  
Elizabeth Justice ◽  
Jeb Justice ◽  
Cynthia Spiker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making ◽  
Low Literacy

Measuring Informed Decision Making about Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Leader ◽  
Constantine Daskalakis ◽  
Clarence H. Braddock ◽  
Elisabeth J. S. Kunkel ◽  
James R. Cocroft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making

Evaluation of a Computer-Based Decision Aid for Promoting Informed Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions Among African American Men: iDecide

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otis L. Owens ◽  
Tisha Felder ◽  
Abbas S. Tavakoli ◽  
Asa A. Revels ◽  
Daniela B. Friedman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
African American ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Technology Use ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
African American Men ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of iDecide on prostate cancer knowledge, informed decision-making self-efficacy, technology use self-efficacy, and intention to engage in informed decision-making among African American men. Design: One-group, pretest/posttest. Setting: Community settings in South Carolina. Participants: African American men, ages 40 years +, without a prior prostate cancer diagnosis (n = 354). Intervention: iDecide, an embodied conversational agent-led, computer-based prostate cancer screening decision aid. Measures: Prostate cancer knowledge, informed decision-making self-efficacy, technology use self-efficacy, and intention to engage in informed decision-making. Analysis: Descriptive statistics, paired t tests, general linear modeling, Spearman correlations. Results: On average, participants experienced significant improvements in their prostate cancer knowledge ( P ≤ .001), informed decision-making self-efficacy ( P ≤ .001), and technology use self-efficacy ( P ≤ .001), postintervention. Additionally, 67% of participants reported an intention to engage in informed decision-making. Conclusion: Given the significant improvements across all measures, this research demonstrates that embodied conversational agent-led decision aids can be used to enhance the capacity for making informed prostate cancer screening decisions among African American men and increase their technology use self-efficacy. One critical limitation of this study is that most men had received prostate cancer screening prior to engaging in our intervention, so the implications of this intervention may be different for men who do not have a history of screening. Additionally, actual engagement in informed decision-making postintervention was not assessed.

scholarly journals A Simple Schema for Informed Decision Making About Prostate Cancer Screening

2014 ◽  
Vol 161 (6) ◽  
pp. 441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Vickers ◽  
Kelly Edwards ◽  
Matthew R. Cooperberg ◽  
Alvin I. Mushlin
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making ◽  
Simple Schema
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document