Communicative and critical health literacy, and self-management behaviors in end-stage renal disease patients with diabetes on hemodialysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alden Yuanhong Lai ◽  
Hirono Ishikawa ◽  
Takahiro Kiuchi ◽  
Nandakumar Mooppil ◽  
Konstadina Griva
Keyword(s):  
Health Literacy ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Critical Health Literacy ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Management Behaviors

A preliminary investigation of the Partners in Health scale measurement properties in patients with end stage renal disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Baxter ◽  
Andrea Morello ◽  
David Smith ◽  
Lynda Norton ◽  
David Bentley
Keyword(s):  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Capacity ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Esrd Patients

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is becoming more prevalent in Australia. As a result, strategies to improve quality of life when living with ESRD are becoming increasingly important. The Flinders Program has been developed to help support and increase the self-management capacity of people living with chronic disease. The Partners in Health (PIH) scale is a self-management capacity assessment tool, which is an integral element of the Flinders Program. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the preliminary measurement properties of the PIH scale within the ESRD population. Forty participants took part in the study, which involved survey assessments at baseline and follow up and a semi-structured interview. Results indicated that the PIH scale had good internal reliability (α=0.85), moderate test-retest reliability (r=0.33) and face validity in ESRD patients. Areas for improving the instrument or data collection process were identified through qualitative interviews, and implications are discussed specific to ESRD patients.

scholarly journals 'It's hard to ask': Examining the factors influencing decision-making amongst end-stage renal disease patients considering asking friends and family for a kidney

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Merryn Anne Jones
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Kidney Donation ◽  
Health Board ◽  
Living Kidney Donation ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

<p>Background: Organ donation is an important facet of healthcare delivery in New Zealand, with donation often leading to an increased quality of life for recipients, and a reduction in healthcare costs for the community. People who require new organs have limited options in regards to organ access: they can receive organs from deceased donors, or if a kidney is not volunteered, they might ask someone to donate. For those that choose to ask someone to donate an organ, one barrier that is sometimes voiced is that it is hard to ask family and friends to donate. This project sought to explore the issues surrounding asking for an organ by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, in order to gain a better understanding of the decision-making process and motivations of patients as they choose or decline to approach others for a kidney.  Methods: Participants were recruited from patients with ESRD through the Hawke’s Bay District Health Board. Potential participants were identified as being on the deceased donor list (DDL), or had family or friends being worked up for living kidney donation (LKD). Participants were interviewed and asked about the challenges of asking for a kidney, including such questions as: Who did they ask, and why? Who did they exclude, and why? How did they approach the request, and what were their reasons for asking in this way? Could they identify additional strategies which might have been useful to them, but were either not considered or unavailable? A qualitative descriptive approach was utilised to analyse interview data.  Results: Fifteen participants were interviewed, with most stating that it was hard to ask for a kidney and almost half having never approached anyone for a kidney. For many patients, being expected to recruit donors for LKD was a barrier in itself. Commonly identified themes indicate that recipients may be concerned for the health and wellbeing of their loved ones, or have limited recruitment opportunities, or poor health literacy or self-efficacy. Many Maori recipients stated they favoured a whanau approach to discussing transplant, and most recipients desired more support in order to facilitate approaching donors.  Conclusions: Findings suggest it would be useful to develop a screening tool assessing willingness and motivation to accept a living kidney donation along with self-efficacy, communication and health literacy levels prior to recipients initiating conversations with potential donors, in order to provide tailored support to the recipient with their initial approach. Additionally, psycho-social support could be offered to all recipients to help identify unmet needs or further barriers such as reciprocity or relationship concerns. Finally, closer communication between health professionals who provide care for the recipient, as well as positive media stories and campaigns that raise awareness of the need to transplant may create opportunities for LKD to be discussed within the recipient’s social network.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document