Implementing a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) system to increase colorectal cancer screening: A process evaluation

2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Jo White ◽  
Jennifer R. Stark ◽  
Roger Luckmann ◽  
Milagros C. Rosal ◽  
Lynn Clemow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Telephone Interview ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview

Implementation and Process Evaluation of a Workplace Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Eastern Washington

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy A. Hannon ◽  
Thuy Vu ◽  
Sara Ogdon ◽  
Emily M. Fleury ◽  
Emily Yette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Cancer Screening Program ◽  
Eastern Washington

scholarly journals Intelligent recognition of colorectal cancer combining application of computer-assisted diagnosis with deep learning approaches

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 738
Author(s):  
Akella S. Narasimha Raju ◽  
Kayalvizhi Jayavel ◽  
Tulasi Rajalakshmi
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Premalignant Lesions ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Computer Assisted Diagnosis ◽  
Assisted Diagnosis

<span>The malignancy of the colorectal testing methods has been exposed triumph to decrease the occurrence and death rate; this cancer is the relatively sluggish rising and has an extremely peculiar to develop the premalignant lesions. Now, many patients are not going to colorectal cancer screening, and people who do, are able to diagnose existing tests and screening methods. The most important concept of this motivation for this research idea is to evaluate the recognized data from the immediately available colorectal cancer screening methods. The data provided to laboratory technologists is important in the formulation of appropriate recommendations that will reduce colorectal cancer. With all standard colon cancer tests can be recognized agitatedly, the treatment of colorectal cancer is more efficient. The intelligent computer assisted diagnosis (CAD) is the most powerful technique for recognition of colorectal cancer in recent advances. It is a lot to reduce the level of interference nature has contributed considerably to the advancement of the quality of cancer treatment. To enhance diagnostic accuracy intelligent CAD has a research always active, ongoing with the deep learning and machine learning approaches with the associated convolutional neural network (CNN) scheme.</span>

Process Evaluation in an Intervention Designed to Improve Rates of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a VA Medical Center

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian L. Fitzgibbon ◽  
M. Rosario Ferreira ◽  
Nancy C. Dolan ◽  
Terry C. Davis ◽  
Alfred W. Rademaker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Medical Center

Process Evaluation of a Mailed Interactive Educational DVD in a Comparative Effectiveness Trial to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening

2021 ◽  
pp. 152483992110278
Author(s):  
Mira L. Katz ◽  
Brent Emerson ◽  
Victoria L. Champion ◽  
Peter H. Schwartz ◽  
Thomas F. Imperiale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Effectiveness Trial ◽  
Amount Of Information ◽  
New Information

A process evaluation was conducted as part of a comparative effectiveness trial of a mailed interactive educational DVD intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among average-risk patients who did not attend a scheduled colonoscopy. Participants (n = 371) for the trial were randomized to (1) mailed DVD, (2) mailed DVD plus patient navigation, or (3) usual care. Participants (n = 243) randomized to the two DVD intervention arms were called 2 weeks after mailing materials to complete a process evaluation interview about the DVD (September 2017–February 2020). Forty-nine (20%) participants were not reached, and 194 (80%) participants watched the DVD and completed the interview. The process evaluation assessed whether (1) the DVD content was helpful, (2) any new information was learned by participants, (3) the appropriate amount of information was included in the DVD, (4) participants were engaged when watching the DVD, (5) the DVD content was relevant, (6) participants were satisfied with the DVD (7) participants would recommend the DVD to others, and (8) their opinion about colorectal cancer screening was changed by watching the DVD. Among participants who watched the DVD, 99% reported the screening information was very or somewhat helpful, 47% learned new information, 75% said the DVD included the right amount of information, they were engaged (M = 3.35 out of 4, SD = 0.49), 87% reported all or most information applied to them, they were satisfied (M = 3.42 out of 4, SD = 0.39) with DVD content, 99% would recommend the DVD to others, and 45% reported changing their opinion about screening. To understand the effects of interventions being tested in trials and to plan the dissemination of evidence-based interventions, process evaluation is critical to assess the dose received and acceptability of behavioral interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document