Long-term results after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: A single-center experience

Pancreatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Rückert ◽  
Anja Lietzmann ◽  
Torsten J. Wilhelm ◽  
Moritz Sold ◽  
Georg Kähler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Results ◽  
Pancreatic Pseudocysts ◽  
Endoscopic Drainage ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Center Experience

Long-term results after David I -operation (up to 11 years). A single center experience

2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kueri ◽  
B Nitsch ◽  
C Heilmann ◽  
J Schneider ◽  
C Schlensak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Results ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Center Experience

scholarly journals Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto Ricetto Sacomani ◽  
Stênio de Cássio Zequi ◽  
Walter Henriques da Costa ◽  
Bruno Santos Benigno ◽  
Rodrigo Sousa Madeira Campos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Results ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Artificial Sphincter ◽  
Single Center Experience

scholarly journals Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts: An Experience with 77 Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 061-067
Author(s):  
Hemanta K. Nayak ◽  
Sandeep Kumar ◽  
Uday C. Ghoshal ◽  
Samir Mohindra ◽  
Namita Mohindra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Results ◽  
Pancreatic Pseudocysts ◽  
Endoscopic Drainage ◽  
Stent Occlusion ◽  
Northern India ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Transpapillary Drainage ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

ABSTRACT Background: We evaluated short‑ and long‑term results of endoscopic drainage (a minimally invasive nonsurgical treatment) of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPCs) and factors associated with its success at a multilevel teaching hospital in Northern India, as such data are scanty from India. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of records of consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic drainage of PPC from January 2002 to June 2013 was undertaken. Results: Seventy‑seven patients (56 males), median age 36 years (range, 15–73), underwent endoscopic drainage of PPC with 98% technical success. Pseudocysts drained were symptomatic (duration 11 weeks, range, 8–68), large (volume 582 mL [range, 80–2706]), located in head (n = 32, 46%), body and tail (n = 37, 54%), and infected (n = 39, 49%). Drainage procedures included cystogastrostomy (n = 54, 78%), cystoduodenostomy (n = 9, 13%), transpapillary drainage (n = 2, 3%), and multiple route (n = 4, 6%), with additional endoscopic nasocystic drainage (ENCD) in 41 (59%). Sixty‑nine patients were followed up (median 28 months, range 2–156; other eight lost to follow‑up). Complications (n = 21, 30%) included stent occlusion and migration (13), bleeding (5), perforation (2), and death (1). Endoscopic procedure had to be repeated in 19 patients (28%; 16 for sepsis, 3 for recurrence). The reasons for additional nonendoscopic treatment (n = 8, 12%) included incomplete cyst resolution (3), recurrence (2), bleeding (1), and perforation (2). Overall success rate of endoscopic drainage was 88%. Whereas infected pseudocysts were associated with poorer outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.016; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.001–0.037), placement of ENCD led to better results (OR 11.85; 95% CI 1.03–135.95). Conclusion: Endoscopic drainage is safe and effective for PPC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document