A Survey Study of Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Eye Care Physicians Compared with Family Medicine Physicians

Ophthalmology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna S. Kitzmann ◽  
Nathan B. Fethke ◽  
Keith H. Baratz ◽  
M. Bridget Zimmerman ◽  
David J. Hackbarth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Eye Care

Acupuncture Use in Rural Japanese Family Medicine Populations: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55
Author(s):  
Gregory Shumer ◽  
Sara L. Warber ◽  
Melissa Plegue ◽  
Masaki Amenomori ◽  
Machiko Inoue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Japanese Family ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Comparison of patients’ satisfaction with eye care and family medicine services at a primary health centre in Ogun State, Nigeria

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 5687
Author(s):  
Anthony O. Betiku ◽  
Akinsola B. Folashade ◽  
Olufisayo T. Aribaba ◽  
Omodele O. Jagun ◽  
Omobola O. Oduyoye
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Primary Health Centre ◽  
Eye Care ◽  
Medicine Clinic ◽  
Ogun State ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
The Family ◽  
Eye Clinic

Background: Patient satisfaction need to be assessed to enable the health care provider assess the quality of care from the patients’ perspective. This study aimed to assess and compare the level of patient satisfaction with the two main health services (primary eye care and family medicine services) at primary health centre (PHC), Pakoto, Ifo local government area of Ogun State, Nigeria.Methods:  This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. A total of 280 adult patients attending the eye clinic and family medicine clinic at the PHC, Pakoto were recruited. A structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire-the patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ-III) was used. Data analysis was done using Epi Info 7.0.9.7 version.Results: The average overall mean score was higher in the eye clinic (3.7±0.4) than the family medicine clinic (3.5±0.3) and mean difference was statistically significant (p=0.004, t=-2.876). Most listed areas of dissatisfaction by respondents in the eye clinic were waiting period (17.2%) and number and visiting days of doctors (19%). However, at the family medicine clinic the most listed areas of dissatisfaction were all aspects of medical care (17.7%), electricity (17.7%) and toilet facilities (14.7%). There was significant association between income and general satisfaction (p=0.001)Conclusions: Most patients were generally satisfied with medical care at both clinics studied at the PHC, Pakoto. However, areas of dissatisfaction included waiting period, number of doctors and visiting days and provision of basic amenities. The study recommends that doctors should be encouraged to reside at the PHC, Pakoto and there should be provision of good basic amenities. 

scholarly journals A physician-physiotherapist collaborative model in a family medicine teaching clinic

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e120-122
Author(s):  
Simon Deslauriers ◽  
Marie-Eve Toutant ◽  
Caroline Laberge ◽  
Annie St-Pierre ◽  
François Desmeules ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Medical Residents ◽  
Prise En Charge ◽  
Collaborative Model ◽  
Teaching Clinic ◽  
Musculoskeletal Education ◽  
Collaborative Activities ◽  
Teaching Clinics

Persons with musculoskeletal disorders frequently seek care in family medicine clinics. However, musculoskeletal education provided in medical schools is often considered insufficient. The implementation of a collaborative model that integrates physiotherapists into teaching clinics may benefit the musculoskeletal training of medical residents. This paper describes a model developed in a family medicine teaching clinic by examining the interprofessional educational and collaborative activities implemented in this model. The model allowed to provide physiotherapy services, involve the physiotherapist in the training of family medicine residents and enhance interprofessional collaboration, particularly for the management of persons with musculoskeletal disorders._____Les personnes ayant des troubles musculosquelettiques consultent fréquemment en cliniques de médecine de famille. Cependant, l’enseignement musculosquelettique dispensé dans les programmes de médecine est souvent considéré comme insuffisant. L’implantation d’un modèle de collaboration qui intègre les physiothérapeutes aux cliniques d’enseignement pourrait améliorer la formation des médecins résidents. Cet article décrit un modèle développé dans une clinique d’enseignement en médecine familiale en examinant les activités interprofessionnelles d’éducation et de collaboration implantées dans ce modèle. Le modèle a permis d’offrir des services de physiothérapie, d’impliquer le physiothérapeute dans la formation des médecins résidents et d’améliorer la collaboration interprofessionnelle, particulièrement pour la prise en charge des personnes ayant des troubles musculosquelettiques.

scholarly journals Risk factors for mental health symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in ophthalmic personnel and students in USA (& Canada): a cross-sectional survey study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Pang ◽  
Meng Li ◽  
Connor Robbs ◽  
Jingyun Wang ◽  
Samiksha F. Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Eye Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mental Health Issues

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic poses mental health challenges to frontline healthcare workers. Eye care professionals may be especially susceptible to mental health problems due to high-risk exposures to patients. Yet, no prior research has studied mental health issues among eye care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic among eye care professionals. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey study among eye care professionals and students in the United States and Canada from June 23 to July 8, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 8505 eye care professionals and students received email invitations to the survey and 2134 participated. We measured mental health outcomes including symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress using validated scales, as well as potential risk factors including demographic characteristics, state-level COVID-19 case counts, participants’ patient interactions, childcare responsibilities, and pre-pandemic stress levels. Linear multiple regression and logistic regression analyses were used to determine relationships between risk factors and mental health outcomes. Results We found that 38.4% of eyecare professional participants in the survey met screening threshold as probable cases of anxiety, depression, or both during the COVID-19 pandemic. Controlling for self-reported pre-pandemic stress level and state COVID-19 case daily cases, significant risk factors for depression, anxiety, and psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic included: being female, younger age, and being Black or Asian. Interestingly, we found two somewhat surprising protective factors against depression symptoms: more frequent interactions with patients and having a greater proportion of childcare responsibilities at home. Conclusions This study showed a high prevalence of mental health problems and revealed disparities in mental health among eye care personnel and students: Female, younger, Black, and Asian populations are particularly vulnerable to mental health issues. These results indicate that it is critical to identify mental health issues more effectively and develop interventions among this population to address this significant and growing public health issue. The strategies and policies should be reflective of the demographic disparities in this vulnerable population.

scholarly journals Assimilation of Medical Appointment Scheduling Systems and Their Impact on the Accessibility of Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study

10.2196/30485 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e30485
Author(s):  
Guy Paré ◽  
Louis Raymond ◽  
Alexandre Castonguay ◽  
Antoine Grenier Ouimet ◽  
Marie-Claude Trudel
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Appointment Scheduling ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Medical Appointment

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the adoption of digital health technologies to maximize the accessibility of medical care in primary care settings. Medical appointment scheduling (MAS) systems are among the most essential technologies. Prior studies on MAS systems have taken either a user-oriented perspective, focusing on perceived outcomes such as patient satisfaction, or a technical perspective, focusing on optimizing medical scheduling algorithms. Less attention has been given to the extent to which family medicine practices have assimilated these systems into their daily operations and achieved impacts. Objective This study aimed to fill this gap and provide answers to the following questions: (1) to what extent have primary care practices assimilated MAS systems into their daily operations? (2) what are the impacts of assimilating MAS systems on the accessibility and availability of primary care? and (3) what are the organizational and managerial factors associated with greater assimilation of MAS systems in family medicine clinics? Methods A survey study targeting all family medicine clinics in Quebec, Canada, was conducted. The questionnaire was addressed to the individual responsible for managing medical schedules and appointments at these clinics. Following basic descriptive statistics, component-based structural equation modeling was used to empirically explore the causal paths implied in the conceptual framework. A cluster analysis was also performed to complement the causal analysis. As a final step, 6 experts in MAS systems were interviewed. Qualitative data were then coded and extracted using standard content analysis methods. Results A total of 70 valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed. A large majority of the surveyed clinics had implemented MAS systems, with an average use of 1 or 2 functionalities, mainly “automated appointment confirmation and reminders” and “online appointment confirmation, modification, or cancellation by the patient.” More extensive use of MAS systems appears to contribute to improved availability of medical care in these clinics, notwithstanding the effect of their application of advanced access principles. Also, greater integration of MAS systems into the clinic’s electronic medical record system led to more extensive use. Our study further indicated that smaller clinics were less likely to undertake such integration and therefore showed less availability of medical care for their patients. Finally, our findings indicated that those clinics that showed a greater adoption rate and that used the provincial MAS system tended to be the highest-performing ones in terms of accessibility and availability of care. Conclusions The main contribution of this study lies in the empirical demonstration that greater integration and assimilation of MAS systems in family medicine clinics lead to greater accessibility and availability of care for their patients and the general population. Valuable insight has also been provided on how to identify the clinics that would benefit most from such digital health solutions.

scholarly journals Assimilation of Medical Appointment Scheduling Systems and Their Impact on the Accessibility of Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Paré ◽  
Louis Raymond ◽  
Alexandre Castonguay ◽  
Antoine Grenier Ouimet ◽  
Marie-Claude Trudel
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Appointment Scheduling ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Medical Appointment

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the adoption of digital health technologies to maximize the accessibility of medical care in primary care settings. Medical appointment scheduling (MAS) systems are among the most essential technologies. Prior studies on MAS systems have taken either a user-oriented perspective, focusing on perceived outcomes such as patient satisfaction, or a technical perspective, focusing on optimizing medical scheduling algorithms. Less attention has been given to the extent to which family medicine practices have assimilated these systems into their daily operations and achieved impacts. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to fill this gap and provide answers to the following questions: (1) to what extent have primary care practices assimilated MAS systems into their daily operations? (2) what are the impacts of assimilating MAS systems on the accessibility and availability of primary care? and (3) what are the organizational and managerial factors associated with greater assimilation of MAS systems in family medicine clinics? METHODS A survey study targeting all family medicine clinics in Quebec, Canada, was conducted. The questionnaire was addressed to the individual responsible for managing medical schedules and appointments at these clinics. Following basic descriptive statistics, component-based structural equation modeling was used to empirically explore the causal paths implied in the conceptual framework. A cluster analysis was also performed to complement the causal analysis. As a final step, 6 experts in MAS systems were interviewed. Qualitative data were then coded and extracted using standard content analysis methods. RESULTS A total of 70 valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed. A large majority of the surveyed clinics had implemented MAS systems, with an average use of 1 or 2 functionalities, mainly “automated appointment confirmation and reminders” and “online appointment confirmation, modification, or cancellation by the patient.” More extensive use of MAS systems appears to contribute to improved availability of medical care in these clinics, notwithstanding the effect of their application of advanced access principles. Also, greater integration of MAS systems into the clinic’s electronic medical record system led to more extensive use. Our study further indicated that smaller clinics were less likely to undertake such integration and therefore showed less availability of medical care for their patients. Finally, our findings indicated that those clinics that showed a greater adoption rate and that used the provincial MAS system tended to be the highest-performing ones in terms of accessibility and availability of care. CONCLUSIONS The main contribution of this study lies in the empirical demonstration that greater integration and assimilation of MAS systems in family medicine clinics lead to greater accessibility and availability of care for their patients and the general population. Valuable insight has also been provided on how to identify the clinics that would benefit most from such digital health solutions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document