scholarly journals Relationship between physical factors and subjective image quality of cone-beam computed tomography images according to diagnostic task

2015 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Woo Choi ◽  
Sam-Sun Lee ◽  
Soon-Chul Choi ◽  
Min-Suk Heo ◽  
Kyung-Heo Huh ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kivanç Kamburoglu ◽  
Sema Murat ◽  
Eray Kolsuz ◽  
Hakan Kurt ◽  
Selcen Yüksel ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederico Sampaio Neves ◽  
Thaís de Camargo Souza ◽  
Sérgio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz ◽  
Paulo Sérgio Flores Campos ◽  
Frab Norberto Bóscolo

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 20190336
Author(s):  
Miss Fei Wang ◽  
Xiaoyan Xie ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Zuyan Zhang

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the image quality of cone beam CT (CBCT) under different exposure parameters and the relationship between contrast-to-noise and visibility of eight anatomical structures. Methods: CBCT images for the evaluation of subjective image quality were acquired on an anthropopathic phantom containing a human skeleton embedded in soft tissue equivalent materials using 25 exposure protocols. Visibility of eight anatomical structures was evaluated by five independent observers. Using the SEDENTEXCT IQ Image Quality phantom, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated by ImageJ software. Results: A reduction on the visibility of anatomical structures was seen under lower exposure parameters. However, for 84% of the protocols, visibility of anatomical structures remained acceptable even under some lower parameter settings. As CNR increased, the visibility of anatomical structures also increased correspondingly. A change point could be found in the CNR interval 29.42–36.51 after which the visibility of anatomical structures no longer increases with the increase of CNR. Conclusions: Although CNR decrease under a lower exposure parameter, the image quality often remained acceptable at exposure levels below the manufacture’s recommended settings. It is possible to standardize subjective image quality by physical factors. Currently, it is not possible to predetermine a change point CNR value due to different CBCT machine and variation of diagnostic tasks.


2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 675-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Schegerer ◽  
Ursula Lechel ◽  
Manuel Ritter ◽  
Gerald Weisser ◽  
Christian Fink ◽  
...  

Radiography ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
C.J. Greenall ◽  
B. Thomas ◽  
N.A. Drage ◽  
J. Brown

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document